[1]
H. Yin, G. Wen, S. Hou, K. Chen, Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of honeycomb-filled single and bitubular polygonal tubes, Mater. Design 32 (2011) 4449-4460.
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.060
Google Scholar
[2]
Z. Zhang, S. Liu, Z. Tang, Comparisons of honeycomb sandwich and foam-filled cylindrical columns under axial crushing loads, Thin Wall. Struct. 49 (2011) 1071-1079.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.03.017
Google Scholar
[3]
S. Santosa, T. Wierzbicki, Crash behaviour of box columns filled with aluminium honeycomb or foam, Comput. Sturct. 68 (1998) 343-367.
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(98)00067-4
Google Scholar
[4]
M.Z. Mahmoudabadi, M. Sadighi, A theoretical and experimental study on metal hexagonal honeycomb crushing under quasi-static and low velocity impact loading, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 4958-4966.
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.009
Google Scholar
[5]
M.Z. Mohamoudabadi, M. Sadighi, A study on the static and dynamic loading of the foam filled metal hexagonal honeycomb – theoretical and experimental, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 530 (2011) 333-343.
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.093
Google Scholar
[6]
S. Xu, J.H. Beynon, D. Ruan, G. Lu, Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs, Compos. Struct. 94 (2012) 2326-2336.
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024
Google Scholar
[7]
H.R. Zarei, M. Kröger, Crashworthiness optimization of empty and filled aluminium crash box, Int. J. Crashworthiness 12 (2007) 255-264.
DOI: 10.1080/13588260701441159
Google Scholar
[8]
H. Zarei, M. Kröger, Optimum honeycomb filled crash absorber design, Mater. Design 29 (2008) 193-204.
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.013
Google Scholar
[9]
L. Aktay, C. Çakıroglu, M. Güden, Quasi-static axial crushing behaviour of honeycomb-filled thin –walled aluminium tubes, Open Mater. Sci. J. 5 (2011) 184-193.
DOI: 10.2174/1874088x01105010184
Google Scholar
[10]
M.R. Said, C. Fai Tan, Aluminium honeycomb under quasi-static compressive loading: an experimental investigation, Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. 16 (2008) 1-8.
Google Scholar
[11]
H. Yin, G. Wen, Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications under axial loading, Int. J. Mech. Mater. 7 (2011) 253-263.
DOI: 10.1007/s10999-011-9163-5
Google Scholar
[12]
X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Energy absorption limit of plates in thin-walled structures under compression, Int. J. Impact Eng. 57 (2013) 81-98.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.02.001
Google Scholar
[13]
X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Energy absorption of multi-cell stub columns under axial compression, Thin Wall. Struct. 68 (2013) 156-163.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.014
Google Scholar
[14]
X. Zhang, G. Cheng, A comparative study of energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled and multi-cell square columns, Int. J. Impact Eng. 34 (2007) 1739-1752.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.10.007
Google Scholar
[15]
X. Zhang, G. Cheng, H. Zhang, Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of multi-cell square thin-walled structures, Thin Wall. Struct. 44 (2006) 1185-1191.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2006.09.002
Google Scholar
[16]
M.H. Kashani, H.S. Alavijeh, H. Akbarshahi, M. Shakeri, Bitubular square tubes with different arrangements under quasi-static axial compression loading, Mater. Design 51 (2013) 1095-1103.
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.084
Google Scholar
[17]
Y. Liu, Crashworthiness design of multi-corner thin-walled columns, Thin Wall. Struct. 46 (2008) 1329-1337.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.04.003
Google Scholar