Which Rust Deposition Model Should Be Used in Predicting Concrete Cover Cracking due to Reinforcement Corrosion?

Article Preview

Abstract:

The critical amount of corroded steel that causes concrete cover cracking can be readily calculated based on thick-walled cylinder theory. However, the results may vary significantly depending on how the rust deposition is considered. There are several rust deposition hypothesis proposed in the literature for modelling concrete cover cracking of RC structures due to reinforcement corrosion. Among them, three are considered representative ones and have been widely cited in the literature. They are: (i) assumes a certain amount of rust product carried away from the rust layer and deposited within the open cracks proposed by Pantazopoulou and Papoulia; (ii) assumes all of the rust products build up around the bar and all of them are responsible for the expansive pressure proposed by Bazant; (iii) assumes certain amount of rust products deposited into a porous zone around the bar/concrete interface proposed by Liu and Weyers. In this paper, all three rust deposition hypotheses were examined for the critical amount of corrosion to induce cover cracking. When compared to the test data available from the literature, it showed that the porous zone model proposed by Liu and Weyers gives the best predictions. Thus it may be concluded that assuming a porous zone around the steel/concrete interface would be reasonable and may be adopted in developing concrete cover cracking predictive model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 468-471)

Pages:

1000-1004

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] Tuutti K., Performance of concrete in marine environment, ACI SP-65, Detroit, Michigan, 1980, p.223.

Google Scholar

[2] Mart´ın-P´erez B., PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, 1999.

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Y. and Weyers R, ACI Materials Journal, V. 95, No. 6. 1998, p.675.

Google Scholar

[4] Al-Sulaimani G. J., Kaleemullah M., Basunbul I. A., Rasheeduzzafar, ACI Structural Journal, V. 87, No. 2. 1990, p.220.

Google Scholar

[5] Timoshenko S. and Goodier J., Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

Google Scholar

[6] Reinhard H.W. and Van Der Veer C., In Applications of Fracture Mechanics to Reinforced Concrete, Elsevier Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992, p.333.

Google Scholar

[7] Nielsen C.V. and Bicanic N., Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 54, No. 3. 2002, p.215.

Google Scholar

[8] Pantazopoulou S.J. and Papoulia K.D., Journal of Engineering Mechanics, V. 127, No. 4. 2001, p.342.

Google Scholar

[9] Bazant Z.P., ASCE J Struct Div, V. 105, No. 6. 1979, p.1155.

Google Scholar

[10] Oluokun F.A., ACI Materials Journal, V. 88, No. 3. 1991, p.302.

Google Scholar

[11] AS 3600-2009, "Concrete Structures," Standard Australia, 2009.

Google Scholar

[12] Zhao Y., Ren H., Dai H., Jin W., Corrosion Science, V. 53, No. 5. 2011, p.1646.

Google Scholar