Discussion on Properties and Microstructure of Geopolymer Concrete Containing Fly Ash and Recycled Aggregate

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction materials dominate the main responsibility to maintain the environmental sustainable development in human’s activities. Geopolymer concrete containing fly ash and recycled aggregate is a new concrete which can reuse the by-product of power station and waste concrete, as well as reduce the production of cement which contribute a lot of carbon dioxide emission in the manufacturing process. In this paper, experiments were carried out to investigate the mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer concrete with different recycled aggregate contents. Six mixtures were designed including alkali-activated fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete and corresponding ordinary concrete as the comparison. The compressive strength of the concrete with 0%, 50% and 100% recycled aggregates was tested. The microstructure of these concrete were investigated by petrographic microscope under transmit light. According to experimental results, the strength development and failure mechanism are discussed. Furthermore, the application of such geopolymer concrete is discussed and suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 450-451)

Pages:

1577-1583

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] C. Meyer, Cement & Concrete Composites, 31 (2009) 601-605.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Duxson, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, and J. S. J. Van Deventer, Cement and Concrete Research, 37 (2007) 1590-1597.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018

Google Scholar

[3] J. Davidovits, Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37 (1991) 1633-1656.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Steveson and K. Sagoe-Crentsil, Journal of Materials Science, 40 (2005) 4247-4259.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Komljenovic, Z. Bascarevic, and V. Bradic, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181 (2010) 35-42.

Google Scholar

[6] W. K. W. Lee and J. S. J. Van Deventer, Cement and Concrete Research, 32 (2002) 577-584.

Google Scholar

[7] R. E. Lyon, P. N. Balaguru, A. Foden, U. Sorathia, J. Davidovits, and M. Davidovics, Fire Materials, 21 (1997) 67-73.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(199703)21:2<67::aid-fam596>3.0.co;2-n

Google Scholar

[8] J. M. Miranda, A. Fernandez-Jimenez, J. A. Gonzalez, and A. Palomo, Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (2005) 1210-1217.

Google Scholar

[9] J. G. S. van Jaarsveld, J. S. J. Van Deventer, and G. C. Lukey, Chemical Engineering Journal, 4001 (2002) 1-11.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Xu and J. S. J. van Deventer, The gopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals, in International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2000, pp.247-256.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(99)00074-5

Google Scholar

[11] D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah, D. M. J. Sumajouw, and B. V. Rangan, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 6 (2005) 77-86.

DOI: 10.1080/13287982.2005.11464946

Google Scholar

[12] D. Hardjito and B. V. Rangan, Development and Properties of Low Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia2005.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Hewayde, M. Nehdi, E. Allouche, and G. Nakhla, Magazine of Concrete Research, 58 (2006) 321-331.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2006.58.5.321

Google Scholar

[14] T. Bakharev, Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (2005) 1224-1232.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Palomo, M. W. Grutzeck, and M. T. Blanco, Cement and Concrete Research, 29 (1999) 1323-1329

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00243-9

Google Scholar