doiSerbia

Hip function and health-related quality of life in intramedullary and extramedullary internal fixation of trochanteric fractures

Mitković Milan M. (Clinical Center Niš, Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology, Niš, Serbia + University of Niš, Medical Faculty, Niš, Serbia)
Milenković Saša S. (Clinical Center Niš, Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology, Niš, Serbia + University of Niš, Medical Faculty, Niš, Serbia)
Micić Ivan D. (Clinical Center Niš, Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology, Niš, Serbia + University of Niš, Medical Faculty, Niš, Serbia)
Kostić Igor M. (Clinical Center Niš, Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology, Niš, Serbia)
Stojiljković Predrag M. (Clinical Center Niš, Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology, Niš, Serbia + University of Niš, Medical Faculty, Niš, Serbia)
Mitković Milorad B. (University of Niš, Medical Faculty, Niš, Serbia)

Introduction/Objective. There are extramedullary and intramedullary methods of trochanteric fractures’ internal fixation with implants having a lag screw. The objective of this study was to examine the difference in impact of these fixation types on final hip function and health-related quality of life. Method. There were 75 patients treated for a trochanteric fracture, using self-dynamisable internal fixator (SIF group), as an extramedullary method, or gamma nail (GN group), as an intramedullary method. These patients were called for the evaluation of Harris Hip Score (HHS) and SF-12 questionnaire at least two years after surgery. The SF-12 questionnaire has dual expression – physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Results. There were no significant differences between the SIF group and the GN group regarding HHS, PCS, and MCS. Positive correlation was confirmed between HHS, PCS, and MCS, with the strongest relation between HHS and PCS. Negative correlation was confirmed between age and HHS. Conclusion. There was no difference in final hip function and health-related quality of life between SIF and GN methods in trochanteric fractures treatment (p > 0.05). These parameters of outcome were confirmed to have positive interrelation (p < 0.05). Both submuscular presence of extramedullary implant with dimensions of SIF and the need for bone reaming in cephalomedullary fixation were considered not to have significant impact in HHS and SF-12 scores after trochanteric fractures treatment by internal fixation.

Keywords: self-dynamisable internal fixator, gamma nail, hip function, health-related quality of life

Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III41017: Virtual human osteoarticular system and its application in preclinical and clinical practice