doiSerbia

Management of major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy - single center experience

Tošković Borislav (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia + University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia)
Bilanović Dragoljub (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia)
Resanović Aleksandar (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia )
Todorović Slobodan (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia )
Mrda Davor (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia )
Crnokrak Bogdan (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia )
Nađ Igor (Bežanijska Kosa Clinical-Hospital Center, Belgrade, Serbia )

Introduction/Objective. Bile duct injuries represent a devastating and potentially life-threatening consequence of cholecystectomy. Although most cholecystectomies are currently performed laparoscopically, some complex cases require an open approach. The aim of this report is to present and analyze a single center experience regarding the management of these injuries. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary referral institution. During a 13-year period, we identified a total of 64 patients. Only patients requiring surgical reconstruction to repair bile duct injuries were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to the type of surgical approach, i.e. laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy. Results. Out of 64 patients with bile duct injuries, 38 (59.4%) incurred the injuries during open and 26 (40.6%) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No differences between the groups were observed concerning the time of bile duct injury diagnosis, type of injury, incidence of concomitant vascular and bile duct injuries, type of reconstruction procedure or complication rates after the primary intervention. The latency of bile duct injury management was found to differ between the study groups. In the open cholecystectomy group, bile duct injuries were managed significantly later than in the laparoscopic one. Conclusion. The results suggest that bile duct injuries occur with equal frequency after laparoscopic as well as open cholecystectomy. However, injuries are managed later after open than after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Tertiary centers have satisfactory outcomes of major bile duct injury reconstruction, with low rates of both morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: bile duct injuries, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, biliary reconstruction