About the journal

Cobiss

Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 2016 Volume 144, Issue 11-12, Pages: 621-625
https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH1612621M
Full text ( 178 KB)
Cited by


Negative-pressure wound therapy for deep groin vascular infections

Matić Predrag (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)
Tanasković Slobodan ORCID iD icon (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)
Živić Rastko (School of Medicine, Belgrade + Clinical Center „Dr Dragiša Mišović“, Belgrade)
Jocić Dario (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade)
Gajin Predrag (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)
Babić Srđan (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)
Soldatović Ivan ORCID iD icon (School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Belgrade)
Vučurević Goran (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade)
Nenezić Dragoslav (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)
Radak Đorđe (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade + School of Medicine, Belgrade)

Introduction. Infection of synthetic graft in the groin is a rare but devastating complication. When it occurs, several possibilities of treatment are available. Extra-anatomic reconstruction and in-situ implantation of new, infection resistant grafts are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Therefore, more conservative approach is needed in some cases. Negative-pressure wound therapy is one of the options in treating such patients. Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome for deep groin vascular graft infection treated with negative-pressure wound therapy. Methods. Seventeen patients (19 wounds), treated for Szilagyi grade III groin infections between October 2011 and June 2014, were enrolled into this observational study. Results. Majority of the wounds (11/19) were healed by secondary intention, and the rest of the wounds (8/19) were healed by primary intention after initial negative-pressure wound therapy and graft substitution with silver-coated prostheses or autologous artery/vein implantation. No early mortality was observed. Minor bleeding was observed in one patient. Reinfection was noted in three wounds. Only one graft occlusion was noted. Late mortality was observed in three patients. Conclusion. Negative-pressure wound therapy seems to be safe for groin vascular graft infections and comfortable for both patient and surgeon. However, the rate of persistent infection is high. This technique, in our opinion, can be used as a “bridge” from initial wound debridement to definitive wound management, when good local conditions are achieved for graft substitution, either with new synthetic graft with antimicrobial properties or autologous artery/vein. In selected cases of deep groin infections it can be used as the only therapeutic approach in wound treatment.

Keywords: groin infection, synthetic graft infection, negative-pressure wound therapy