Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 2008 Volume 136, Issue Suppl. 2, Pages: 109-115
https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH08S2109V
Full text ( 630 KB)
Cited by
Cesarean delivery - Vejnovic modification
Vejnović Tihomir R. (Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Novi Sad)
INTRODUCTION. Cesarean delivery is the most common obstetric surgery today.
Improvement of operative techniques, anaesthesia, care and transfusion has
contributed to the safety of the procedure and expansion of indications. The
operative technique usually consists of opening the abdominal wall by
inferior transverse incision, isthmococervical transverse incision, and
closing the uterus by continuous suture after delivering the neonate.
Peritonisation is not obligatory. The last is the repair of the abdominal
wall. The main characteristic of Vejnović modification is shortening uterus
suture so the subsequent scar is smaller. The fascia is opened by sharp
dissection, the uterus is opened with scissors at the 20-30 degrees angle,
the neonate is spontaneously expulsed (not taken out), the placenta is
delivered by cord traction with simultaneously massage of the fundus ,
peritonisation is not performed and the skin is sutured with a continuous
intradermal suture. OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study is to point out
the advantages of Vejnović modification vs. commonly used operative
techniques. METHOD. A retrospective and prospective random study was
designed, which comprised 1886 subjects delivered by C-section, a
modification developed at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Novi Sad,
from 2000-2006. A control group comprised 100 patients delivered from 1991 to
2006 by "common" operative technique (s.c. Doerfler, abdominal opening by
Pfannenstielu, transversal incision o of the lower uterine segment,
peritonisation using continuous sutures to repair the abdomen). We used
Student’s t-test for statistical analysis. RESULTS. The modified technique
showed to be twice shorter that the usually used technique, the used suture
material was twice lower, hospital stay was shorter, with blood loss lower
for 30.9%, and there were less complications, which was all of statistical
significance (p<0.01). CONCLUSION. The modified technique proved to have both
medical and economic advantages. In the future, we plan to conduct a
prospective study with more subjects (both in control and experimental
groups) in order to evaluate the number and size of adhesions after
laparatomy by Pfannenstiel (s.c. Doerfler elaparotomies and modified repeated
laparotomies.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery, modification, benefits