Volume 6, 2022

Radiation Effects

ASSESSMENT OF PIGMENT CONTENT ON WILD GROWING PLANTS IN MOUSSALA PEAK

Tsveta Angelova, Nikolai Tyutyundzhiev, Christo Angelov, Svetla Gateva, Gabriele Jovtchev

Pages: 1-7

DOI: 10.21175/RadProc.2022.01

The highest peak on Rila Mountain is Moussala (2925 m a. s. l.). Its climate conditions depend on the geographic location, peculiarities of relief, and atmospheric circulation, and a specific microclimate is formed. In alpine regions, conditions become extremely variable with the increase in altitude. Plants that are growing in alpine conditions are exposed to the combined impact of environmental factors such as altitude, prolonged UV irradiation, low temperature, etc. This study aims to compare and assess whether the pigment content of wild-growing species at Moussala peak changes in the two following years. As plant material was used following species: Saxifraga cymosa Waldst & Kit (Saxifragaceae), Anthemis carpatica Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. (Asteraceae), Geum repens (Rosaceae), Doronicum columnae Ten.(Asteraceae), Achillea clusiana L. (Asteraceae), Allium sibiricum L. (Liliaceae) and Festuca valida (R.Uechtr.) Pénzes (Poaceae). Plants were collected from Moussala Peak in July-August, in two successive growing seasons of 2020 and 2021. Data for the average daily value of “Erythemal UV irradiance” response (UVE) for the experimental site at Rila Mountain (2925 m a. s. l.) were measured with a UV sensor. Average daily values for July and August are calculated. Photosynthetic pigment content was applied as an endpoint. It was obtained that genotype response varies depending on the environmental conditions of the studied year. Data for UV irradiation at Moussala peak for a period of two following years 2020-2021 show insignificant change. Radiation conditions at Moussala peak show that both years differed in UVE response, but this small change of UV irradiation for one year is probably insignificant. The levels of total chlorophylls, chl. a, chl. b and total carotenoids for most of the studied alpine plants measured for 2021 were insignificantly higher in comparison with those measured for 2020. Only for S. cymosa were evaluated significantly higher pigment levels in 2021 than those in 2020. The chlorophyll a/b ratio was stable for all studied wild species growing at this altitude. The chlorophyll a/b ratio also varies depending on the studied genotype and different radiation conditions of the years studied. Our preliminary data indicate a change in pigment content depending on the different environmental conditions in the respective years and alpine plants examined. Data for radiation conditions at Moussala peak show that both years differed in UVE response, but this small change of UV irradiation for one year is probably insignificant. Changes in pigment content in some of the studied alpine genotypes propose different adaptive strategies to overcome the environmental stress at this altitude. Because alpine conditions at Moussala peak are related to the various impacts of extreme environmental factors on the pigment content of plants, further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of interaction of factors and plant response in the long-term aspect of time.
  1. C. Angelov et al., “BEO Moussala: Complex for Environmental Studies”, in Sustainable Development in Mountain Regions – Southeastern Europe, G. Zhelezov, Ed., Switzerland: Springer, Cham., 2016, ch. 24, pp. 349–365.
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20110-8_24
  2. N. Tyutyundzhiev et al., “Comparative measurements of solar UV irradiation at the high-mountain stations of BEO-Moussala (BG) and NAORozhen (BG)”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1492, article no. 012044, 2020.
    DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1492/1/012044
  3. P. Nojarov, T. Arsov, I. Kalapov, H. Angelov, “Aerosol direct effects on global solar shortwave irradiance at high mountainous station Musala, Bulgaria”, Atmospheric Environment, vol. 244, article no. 117944, 2021.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117944
  4. C. Angelov et al., “Aerosol and gamma background measurements at Basic Environmental Observatory Moussala”, Acta Scientifica Naturalis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34-39, 2016.
    DOI: 10.1515/asn-2016-0005
  5. P. Nojarov, I. Kalapov, “Air temperature regime changes at peak Moussala for the period 1933-2008”, Bul. J. Meteo & Hydro, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2010.
    Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317168458_Air_temperature_regime_changes_at_peak_Moussala_for_the_period_1933-2008
    Retrieved on: July 10, 2022
  6. Rila National Park Management Plan 2001–2010, Rila National Park Directorate, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 2001.
    Retrieved from: https://rilanationalpark.bg/assets/userfiles/Rila%20NP-en.pdf
    Retrieved on: May 15, 2021
  7. F. Talebzadeh, C. Valeo, “Evaluating the Effects of Environmental Stress on Leaf Chlorophyll Content as an Index for Tree Health”, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1006, article no. 012007, 2022.
    DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1006/1/012007
  8. D. I. Arnon, “Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris”, Plant Phys., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1949.
    DOI: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  9. S. P. Gateva et al., “Effect of UV radiation and other abiotic stress factors on DNA of different wild plant species grown in three successive seasons in alpine and subalpine regions”, Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 293–313, 2022.
    DOI: 10.32604/phyton.2022.016397
  10. Ts. V. Angelova, C. V. Angelov, N. Tyutyundzhiev, S. P. Gateva, G. Jovtchev, “Does altitude have an effect on pigment content of wild growing plants in Rila mountain?”, in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Radiation in Various Fields of Research (RAD 2021) , Herceg Novi, Montenegro, 2021, pp. 15–20.
    DOI: 10.21175/RadProc.2021.03
  11. P. Ghosh et al., “Extraction and quantification of pigments from Indian traditional medicinal plants: A comparative study between tree, shrub and herb”, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. & Res., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 3052–3059, 2018.
    DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(7).3052-59
  12. W. Zielewicz, B. Wróbel, G. Niedbała, “Quantification of chlorophyll and carotene pigments content in Mountain Melick (Melica nutans L.) in relation to edaphic variables”, Forests, vol. 11, no. 11, article no. 1197, 2020.
    DOI: 10.3390/f11111197
  13. D. Peev, S. Ivanceva, G. Angelov, M. Kourteva, M. Delcheva, “Phytomonitoring in Rila mountain - 1995 II. Flavonoids, izoenzymes and pigments of the control populations”, in Proc. Observatoire de Montagne de Moussala, OM2, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1996, pp. 153–163.
  14. D. Peev, S. Ivanceva, G. Angelov, M. Kurteva, M. Delcheva, “Phytomonitoring in Rila mountain - 1996 II. Flavonoids, izoenzymes and pigments of the control populations”, in Proc. Observatoire de Montagne de Moussala, OM2, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1997, pp. 106–114.
  15. M. Kurteva, M. Delcheva, D. Peev, “Changes of the Pigmental Content in the Phytomonitors from Control Populations in Rila Mountain”, in Proc. Observatoire de Montagne de Moussala, OM2, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1998, pp. 181–188.
  16. K. Rajalakshmi, N. Banu, “Extraction and Estimation of Chlorophyll from Medicinal Plants”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 4, no. 11, Paper ID: NOV151021, pp. 209–212, 2015.
    Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286927770_Extraction_and_estimation_of_chlorophyll_from_medicinal_plants
    Retrieved on: December 11, 2022
  17. C. Singh, N. Chauhan, S. Gupta, A. Rani, S. Tomar, “Analysis of chlorophyll content in Adiantum Cappillus-veneris L. growing in different habitats in doon valley and nearby areas”, Asian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 8497–8501, 2018.
    Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330282022_analysis_of_cholophyll_content_in_adiantum_capillus-veneris_l_growing_in_different_habitats_in_doon_valley_and_nearby_areas
    Retrieved on: July 11, 2022
Tsveta Angelova, Nikolai Tyutyundzhiev, Christo Angelov, Svetla Gateva, Gabriele Jovtchev, "Assessment of pigment content on wild growing plants in moussala peak", RAD Conf. Proc, vol. 6, 2022, pp. 1-7, http://doi.org/10.21175/RadProc.2022.01