Abstract
Aim:
Fetal skull molding is important for the adaptation of the head to the birth canal during vaginal delivery. Importantly, the fetal head must rotate around the maternal symphysis pubis. The goals of this analysis were to observe a human birth in real-time using an open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and describe the fetal head configuration during expulsion.
Methods:
Real-time cinematic MRI series (TSE single-shot sequence, TR 1600 ms, TE 150 ms) were acquired from the midsagittal plane of the maternal pelvis during the active second stage of labor at 37 weeks of gestation. Frame-by-frame analyses were performed to measure the frontooccipital diameter (FOD) and distance from the vertex to the base of the fetal skull.
Results:
During vaginal delivery in an occiput anterior position, the initial FOD was 10.3 cm. When expulsion began, the fetal skull was deformed and elongated, with the FOD increasing to 10.8 cm and 11.2 cm at crowning. In contrast, the distance from the vertex to the base of the skull was reduced from 6.4 cm to 5.6 cm at expulsion.
Conclusions:
Fetal head molding is the change in the fetal head due to the forces of labor. The biomechanics of this process are poorly understood. Our visualization of the normal mechanism of late second-stage labor shows that MRI technology can for the first time help define the changes in the diameters of the fetal head during active labor.
Funding: The project was supported by a public grant (TSB Technologiestiftung Berlin-Zukunftsfonds Berlin). The funding source had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing support, and the decision to submit the article for publication.
References
[1] Lindgren L. The influence of pressure upon the fetal head during labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:303–9.10.3109/00016347709154983Search in Google Scholar
[2] Baxter J. Moulding of the foetal head; a compensatory mechanism. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1946;53:212–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1946.tb03903.xSearch in Google Scholar
[3] Graham JM Jr, Kumar A. Diagnosis and management of extensive vertex birth molding. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006;45:672–8.10.1177/0009922806291023Search in Google Scholar
[4] Kriewall TJ, Stys SJ, McPherson GK. Neonatal head shape after delivery: an index of molding. J Perinat Med. 1977;5:260–7.10.1515/jpme.1977.5.6.260Search in Google Scholar
[5] Lindgren L. The causes of foetal head moulding in labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1960;39:46–62.10.3109/00016346009157836Search in Google Scholar
[6] McPherson GK, Kriewall TJ. Fetal head molding: an investigation utilizing a finite element model of the fetal parietal bone. J Biomech. 1980;13:17–26.10.1016/0021-9290(80)90004-4Search in Google Scholar
[7] Lapeer RJ, Prager RW. Fetal head moulding: finite element analysis of a fetal skull subjected to uterine pressures during the first stage of labour. J Biomech. 2001;34:1125–33.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00070-7Search in Google Scholar
[8] Pu F, Xu L, Li D, Li S, Sun L, Wang L, et al. Effect of different labor forces on fetal skull molding. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:620–5.10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.12.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Yan X, Kruger JA, Nielsen PM, Nash MP. Effects of fetal head shape variation on the second stage of labour. J Biomech. 2015;48:1593–9.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.062Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation, Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:333–40.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318180a505Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Kawabata I, Takahashi Y, Iwagaki S, Tamaya T. MRI during pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2003;31:449–58.10.1515/JPM.2003.070Search in Google Scholar
[12] Hailey D. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006;1–4.Search in Google Scholar
[13] McPherson GK, Kriewall TJ. The elastic modulus of fetal cranial bone: a first step towards an understanding of the biomechanics of fetal head molding. J Biomech. 1980;13:9–16.10.1016/0021-9290(80)90003-2Search in Google Scholar
[14] Rosenberg K, Trevathan W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution, Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:1199–206.10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.00010.xSearch in Google Scholar
[15] Sorbe B, Dahlgren S. Some important factors in the molding of the fetal head during vaginal delivery–a photographic study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983;21:205–12.10.1016/0020-7292(83)90081-4Search in Google Scholar
[16] Bamberg C, Rademacher G, Guttler F, Teichgraber U, Cremer M, Buhrer C, et al. Human birth observed in real-time open magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:505. e501–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Silva ME, Oliveira DA, Roza TH, Brandao S, Parente MP, Mascarenhas T, et al. Study on the influence of the fetus head molding on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor muscles, during vaginal delivery. J Biomech. 2015;48:1600–5.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
