Figures
Abstract
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important legume with high nutritional value. In Nicaragua, certified healthy seeds of local bean varieties are not available, and seedborne fungi have gained little attention. Here, were surveyed seedborne pathogenic fungi in an important local bean cultivar, ‘INTA Rojo’. Beans grown in the four main production areas in Nicaragua (Boaco, Carazo, Estelí, Matagalpa) for future use as seed stock were sampled from four seed storehouses and six seed lots. A total of 133 fungal strains were isolated from surface-sterilized beans and inoculated to healthy lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus) under controlled conditions. Eighty-seven isolates caused symptoms of varying severity in the seedlings, including discoloration, necrotic lesions, cankers, rot, and lethal necrosis. Pathogenic isolates were divided into eight phenotypically distinguishable groups based on morphology and growth characteristics on artificial growth medium, and further identified by analysis of the internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS1 and ITS2) of the ribosomal RNA genes. The pathogenic isolates belonged to eight genera. Fusarium spp. (F. chlamydosporum, F. equiseti, F. incarnatum), Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Penicillium citrinum were the most damaging and common fungi found in the seed lots. Furthermore, Corynespora cassiicola, Colletotrichum capsisi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe sp. (Phomopsis) were seedborne in cultivar ‘INTA Rojo’ and found to be pathogenic to bean seedlings. This study reveals, for the first time, many seedborne pathogenic fungi in beans in Nicaragua; furthermore, prior to this study, little information was available concerning F. equiseti, F. incarnatum, L. theobromae, C. cassiicola, and Diaporthe spp. as seedborne pathogens of common bean. Our results lay the basis for developing diagnostic tools for seed health inspection and for further study of the epidemiology, ecology, and control of the pathogenic fungi of common beans in the field.
Citation: Marcenaro D, Valkonen JPT (2016) Seedborne Pathogenic Fungi in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. INTA Rojo) in Nicaragua. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0168662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168662
Editor: Beom Seok Kim, Korea University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Received: August 18, 2016; Accepted: December 5, 2016; Published: December 20, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Marcenaro, Valkonen. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All fungal ITS sequence files are available from the NCBI database (accession numbers HQ625606-HQ625642; KX641190-KX641193).
Funding: This work was supported financially by Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (grants 36419901 and 36421515 to JPTV) having no role in data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, and Nicaraguan Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) supported financially collection of research material but had no role in decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important grain legume that is widely grown, especially in Latin America and Africa [1]. It has high nutritional value owing to its notable content of protein, vitamins, zinc, iron, and fiber [2,3]. In Nicaragua, common bean and maize (Zea mays L.) represent the main crops for income generation and food security [1,4], and there is an emphasis on breeding bean cultivars that are better adapted to local growth conditions. Advanced locally selected cultivars such as ‘INTA Rojo’ and ‘INTA Cardenas’ are prioritized by the Nicaraguan government for large-scale production in the cropping systems used by small-scale farmers. ‘INTA Rojo’ was bred in Zamorano School, Honduras, by crossing the cultivar (cv.) ‘INTA Canela’ with cv. ‘DICTA 105’. It is one of the most important bean cultivars in Nicaragua owing to its high yield, drought tolerance, adaptability to different environmental conditions, red skin (preferred by local consumers), good flavor, and short cooking time [5,6].
In Nicaragua, common bean is mainly produced carried out on small farms with limited access to advanced agrotechnology and fertilizers. A severe shortcoming is the lack of healthy seeds because the greatest yield losses owing to pathogens occur when seeds used for planting are infected. Seedborne pathogenic fungi can prevent germination, kill seedlings, or reduce plant growth by damaging the roots and vascular system, which prevents the transport of water and nutrients [7,8]. Seedborne pathogenic fungi that cause losses of yield and quality of common bean worldwide include, but are not limited to, Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid., Fusarium oxysporum (Schltdl.) Fr., F. solani (Mart.) Sacc., and Rhizoctonia solani Kühn [9,10].
Production of healthy, certified seed beans for local use is an important goal in Nicaragua. Although information exists concerning pathogenic fungi in many crops in Nicaragua, little knowledge is available concerning those of common bean [11]. Hence, knowledge of the locally prevailing seedborne pathogenic fungi in bean needs to be improved so pertinent seed inspection procedures may be carried out. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify fungi transmitted in the beans (‘INTA Rojo’) and to test their pathogenicity on seedlings.
Materials and Methods
Analysis of emergence and symptoms of seedlings
Beans inspected for seedborne fungi were harvested from Boaco, Carazo, Estelí, and Matagalpa, representing the four main bean growing areas in Nicaragua. The crops were grown during the “primera” season (May–August, 2008) of the year. Samples from six storehouses were taken in August–October. The storehouses were owned by cooperatives established by small holders. Each storehouse contained 8–15 t of beans harvested from 10–20 farms. Guidelines of the International Seed Testing Association [12] were followed in taking six subsamples from stored beans of a storehouse, combining them (final sample size 1.5–2.0 kg/storehouse), and blending to homogeneity.
For testing emergence, eight subsamples (50 beans each) were taken from each of the six samples. Each subsample was planted in a separate tray (38 x 24 cm, depth 19 cm) filled with sterilized growth medium (autoclaved at 121°C for 2 h) consisting of washed sand and peat. The trays were organized according to a completely randomized design in a growth room (20–22°C) in dim light (photoperiod 11 h). Emergence of seedlings was observed for 15 days, after which all plants were gently removed from soil, rinsed with water, and observed for disease-like symptoms in the stem base and roots. One-way analysis of variance and comparison of means based on the Tukey test (α = 0.05) were done to determine whether the seed lots differed with respect to emergence and incidence of disease-like symptoms.
The experiments was organised according to Completely Random Design (CRD) using the six seed lots and eight repetitions of each. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparison of means based on the Tukey test (α = 0.05) were done to find out whether the seed lots tested differed statistically significantly for each of the evaluated variables. The most important result from ANOVA are summarized in Table 1.
Six bean storehouses belonging to different small farmers’ cooperatives were sampled in four regions in Nicaragua. Eight subsamples (50 seeds each) were taken from each store and planted under controlled conditions. Least significant difference of means for emergence = 10.4 (p = 0.00006; Tukey, α = 0.05).
Isolation of fungi
Eight samples (8 beans each) were taken from each seedlot and surface-sterilized by submerging first into 3% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min and then 70% ethanol for 3 min, followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water for 5 min and letting dry for a short while on sterile filter paper in a laminar flow cabinet. Two growth media were used for fungal isolation: potato dextrose agar (PDA) and nutrient agar (Merck Millipore) complemented with streptomycin (Sigma) at 50 mg/l [13]. Surface-sterilized beans were placed on growth medium in Petri dishes (Ø 10 cm), 8 beans per dish. Lids of Petri dishes were closed and sealed with Parafilm (Bemis), and the dishes were incubated at room temperature (25–30°C) in the dark for 4–7 days. As soon as fungal growth was observed on beans, mycelium was transferred with sterile forceps to fresh culture medium. As the fungus grew, single tips of mycelia were picked from the edge of the colony and transferred to fresh medium. The pure cultures of fungi thus obtained were stored at room temperature in the dark.
Pathogenicity tests
Pathogenicity of 113 fungal isolates on beans was assessed twice in two independent experiments, as described elsewhere [13]. There were four replicates (four tubes) and one non-inoculated control for each fungal isolate per experiment. Lima bean (P. lunatus L.) obtained from the former MTT Agrifood Research Finland (currently Natural Resources Institute) was used for pathogenicity tests because healthy seeds of ‘INTA Rojo’ or other common bean varieties grown in Nicaragua were not available. Wild forms of lima bean are of Mesoamerican and Andean origin and grow in Nicaragua. They are likely exposed to the same pathogens as cultivated common beans. Lima beans were surface-sterilized (as described above) and germinated on moist sterile filter paper in Petri dishes. Sterilized (autoclaved) sand (~10 ml) was transferred to a sterile plastic test tube (50 ml) and moistened with sterile water. A healthy germinated bean was placed on the layer of sand (Fig 1). More sand (10 ml) was added to cover the bean, after which a piece of PDA containing hyphae of the test fungal isolate was taken with a cork borer (Ø 5 mm) and placed on the sand. Finally, the test tube was filled with sterile sand and closed gently with a cap. Later, the cap was opened to allow emergence of the sprout.
(a) A pathogen-free pre-germinated lima bean was placed on a layer of sterilized, moist sea sand in a 50-ml sterile test tube. A layer (1 cm) of sand was added, and a piece of PDA containing hyphae of the fungus was placed on the sand. The tube was filled with sand up to 2 cm from the top, closed loosely with a cap, and incubated at 20°C under dim light in a growth room. (b) Seedlings reached a height of 10–12 cm (unless heavily damaged) and were observed for symptoms at 20 dpi. Symptoms shown in (b) were caused by Macrophomina phaseolina.
Tubes were incubated at 20°C under dim light in a growth room. Pathogenicity of the fungal isolates was evaluated 20 days post-inoculation (dpi). Sand and the seedling were gently removed from the tube and symptoms recorded. To fulfill Koch’s postulates, pieces of symptomatic tissue were excised from the seedlings with a sterile scalpel, transferred to PDA, and fungal growth was monitored and identified with help of a microscope.
DNA isolation and PCR amplification of the ITS regions
Mycelia were ground in liquid nitrogen and DNA isolated using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [14] with minor modifications (CTAB extraction buffer: 2% w/v CTAB, 20 mM sodium EDTA, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 1.4 M NaCl). The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and 2 (ITS2) regions of the rRNA genes were amplified using universal primers (ITS-1: 5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTCCGG-3’; ITS-4: 5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) specific for the flanking 18S and 28S rRNA genes in fungi [15]. Each PCR reaction (50 μl) contained 10 μl of 5× Phusion High Fidelity reaction buffer (Finnzymes), 1 μl of dNTPs (10 mM), 1.5 μl of 20 μM primers (ITS-1 and ITS-4), 0.25 μl of Phusion High Fidelity DNA polymerase (2 U/μl, Finnzymes) and 250 ng of DNA template in nuclease-free water. Amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient) using the following program: initial denaturation at 98°C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 15 s, annealing at 63°C for 15 s, extension at 72°C for 15 s, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min and hold at 10°C. Reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. The expected size of the PCR product amplified by the ITS-1/ITS-4 primer pair was ~600 nt [15].
DNA sequencing
PCR products were purified using the EZNA gel extraction kit (Omega Bio-Tek), exonuclease I of Escherichia coli (EXOI) (Fermentas), and either calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (CIAP) (Fermentas) or shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) (Fermentas). To 40 μl of PCR product, 4 μl of EXOI and 8 μl of CIAP (or SAP) were added, mixed well, and incubated at 37°C for 15–20 min and at 75–80°C for 20 min. Direct sequencing of purified PCR products (15 μl) was done using the primer ITS-1 at Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Finland. The sequenced region included partial ITS1, the 5.8S rRNA gene, entire ITS2, and part of the 28S rRNA gene.
Species identification and sequence comparisons
Taxonomic keys [16–19], Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org), and species descriptions linked to the Taxonomy Browser of NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/) were consulted to identify the fungi. Morphological characters of fungi were assessed under a light microscope (Leica), and when necessary, hyphae and spores were stained with lactophenol cotton blue (20 g deionized water, 20 g phenol, 20 g lactic acid, 40 g glycerol, 0.05 g cotton blue).
Representative sequences determined in this study were deposited to the NCBI sequence database (S1 Table). BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast) was used to compare the nucleotide sequences of the PCR products including partial ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 (~450 nt), with fungal sequences available in the NCBI database. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL-X. Nucleotide identities between sequences were computed using the CLUSTAL-W procedure. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with the neighbor-joining method using 1000 replicates and the Kimura two-parameter model as implemented in MEGA version 5 [20].
Results
Emergence and growth of bean seedlings
Emergence of bean seedlings was low (24–38%) regardless of the source storehouse as observed 15 days after planting (Table 1). However, differences in emergence were significant between some storehouses (one-way analysis of variance, p = 0.00006). The poorest emergence was observed with beans from Boaco and one storehouse in Carazo, whereas beans from the other storehouse in Carazo showed the best emergence (Table 1).
All emerged seedlings were inspected for symptoms. Depending on the source, 9–48% of the emerged seedlings displayed disease-like symptoms, but differences between seed lots were not significant (p = 0.130). Lethal-to-mild necrosis or different levels of discoloration were observed on roots, and cankers and necrotic areas were observed in shoots. The most severe symptoms were associated with poor growth of seedlings (Fig 2). Beans that failed to emerge were also inspected, and most were found to be rotten—often covered by fungal mycelia. Some soft and rotten beans had an unpleasant odor, suggesting bacterial infection, which was not studied further.
Plants were inspected 15 days after planting. 1, Early death of roots and the seedling; 2, root rot and poor emergence of the seedling; 3, necrosis in roots and poor growth of the seedling; 4, discoloration (mild necrosis) at the neck of the tap root (indicated by the black arrow).
Pathogenicity of fungal isolates in different phenogroups
In total, 133 fungal isolates were obtained from surface-sterilized beans of the six seed lots and tested for pathogenicity on lima beans. The results of two independent experiments were consistent in showing that 87 fungal isolates caused symptoms on bean seedlings. Typical symptoms included cankers, necrosis, growth decline, dieback, or rot at 20 dpi. No obvious symptoms were detected in seedlings growing from beans inoculated with the remaining 45 isolates or those that were mock-inoculated using a piece of PDA without fungus.
All the phenotypically similar fungal isolates were designated to a phenogroup based on the observed morphological and growth characteristics. Eight distinguishable phenogroups were identified (Table 2). Only the pathogenic isolates were considered for further study.
Phenotypic features of fungal isolates grown on nutrient agar were compared, and the phenotypically similar isolates were designated to the same ‘phenogroup’. Pathogenicity was tested on lima beans under controlled conditions.
We found that the pathogenic isolates within phenogroups were uniform in terms of the types of symptoms they caused in bean seedlings. Isolates of phenogroup I caused root rot, lesions on the stem, and poor growth of seedlings (S1A Fig), whereas no damage was observed in the non-inoculated controls. Isolates of phenogroup II induced charcoal rot, dark lesions on stems, and root rot (S1B Fig). Isolates of phenogroup III (S1C Fig) and IV (Fig 3) induced severe symptoms including dieback, decay, and cankers on stems and roots of the inoculated bean seedlings.
(a) to (c), inoculated plants at 20 dpi, and (d), non-inoculated control. Necrosis in the middle of the stem corresponds to the position of inoculum placed in the test tube. All inoculated seedlings display severe apical necrosis.
Isolates in phenogroup V induced symptoms of anthracnose, including small dark spots on the stem, discoloration of roots, and dark spots or small dark-brown-to-black lesions on cotyledons (S1D Fig). The isolates of the phenogroups VI (S1E Fig) and VII (S1F Fig) caused merely mild symptoms such as discoloration of the stem, whereas isolates of phenogroup VIII caused cankers and decay (Fig 4). Fungi were re-isolated from the inoculated, symptomatic plant tissue to PDA, grown, and identified, thus fulfilling Koch’s postulates.
(a) to (d), inoculated plants at 20 dpi, and (e), non-inoculated control. (a) and (b), necrotic roots and whitish mycelia growing on the stem; necrosis at apex of the seedling. (c) and (d), cankers on stem and wilted apex of the seedling.
Species of pathogenic fungi detected in seed beans and confirmed in lima bean
Isolates placed to phenogroup I were morphologically similar to Fusarium spp. (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Sordariomycetes; Order Hypocreales; Family Nectriaceae) (S2A Fig). ITS sequences were 99–100% identical to those of F. chlamydosporum (Wollenv.), F. equiseti (Corda) Sacc. sensu Gordon, or F. incarnatum (R.) Sacc. Fusarium spp. were detected in all seed lots except lot no. 2 from Carazo.
In phenogroup II, the ITS sequences were 99–100% identical to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid (anamorph or synonymous with Rhizoctonia bataticola Taub.) (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Ascomycetes; Order Incertae sedis; Family Incertae sedis). M. phaseolina was detected in Boaco, Carazo, and Matagalpa.
Isolates of phenogroup III were detected in the seed lot from Boaco and one seed lot (no. 3) from Carazo. Morphological features were similar to Lasiodiplodia spp. (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Dothideomycetes; Order Botryosphaeriales; Family Botryophaeriaceae), which was consistent with high ITS sequence identities (99%) compared with Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maublanc, and the teleomorph Botryosphaeria rhodina (Berk, & Curt. v. Arx) Penz. (Fig 5, S2B Fig). In the phylogenetic analysis, sequences of L. theobromae isolates obtained from the databank fell in five distinguishable phylogenetic clusters supported by bootstrap values ≥70%. Sequences of the isolates differed between Boaco and Carazo but were identical within each region (Fig 5).
Partial ITS1 and the whole 5.8S and ITS2 sequences (~450 nt) of the fungi isolated from beans grown in Boaco and Carazo (bold letters) were included in the phylogenetic analysis with sequences of Lasiodiplodia theobromae obtained from sequence databases. Numbers at branches represent bootstrap values of 1000 replicates. Only bootstrap values ≥70% are shown. Scale indicates Kimura units in nucleotide substitutions per site.
Sequences of phenogroup IV isolates were most closely related to Corynespora spp. (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Dothideomycetes; Order Pleosporales; Family Corynesporascaceae), and all were identical to C. cassiicola (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) C.T. Wei. Two pathogenic isolates were detected in Carazo (seed lot no. 2).
Phenogroup V contained isolates related to Colletotrichum species. The sequence of one isolate from Boaco was identical to isolates of C. gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc. [teleomorph Glomerella cingulata (Stoneman) Spaulding & von Schrenk] (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Sordariomycetes; Order Incartae sedis; Family Glomellaceae; Genus Glomerella). Sequences of the four other isolates were identical to C. capsici (Syd) E.J. Butler & Bisby (Phylum Ascomycota; Class Sordariomycetes; Order Phyllacharales; Family Phyllachoraceae). Because the sequences of all four isolates were identical, only two of them were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig 6). In total, seven C. capsici isolates were detected in samples from Boaco and Matagalpa.
Partial ITS1 and the whole 5.8S and ITS2 sequences (~450 nt) of the fungi isolated from beans grown in Boaco (bold letters) were included in the phylogenetic analysis with sequences of Colletotrichum capsici (clade 1), C. gloeosporioides (clade 3), C. parsonsiae (JQ005233), C. petchii (JQ005223), and C. constrictum (JQ00538) (clade 2) obtained from sequence databases (S1 Table). Numbers at branches represent bootstrap values of 1000 replicates. Only bootstrap values of ≥70% are shown. Scale indicates Kimura units in nucleotide substitutions per site.
Phenogroup VI included Penicillium spp. detected in all six regions. The ITS sequences were 99% identical to Penicillium citrinum (Link). Phenogroup VII contained isolates with ITS sequences identical to Aspergillus flavus (Link). They were detected in Estelí (seed lot no. 5) and Matagalpa. Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. belong to Phylum Ascomycota; Class Eurotiomycetes; Order Eurotiales; Family Trichocomaceae.
Phenogroup VIII isolates showed 99–100% identity to fungi in the genus Diaporthe Nitschke (anamorph Phomopsis, Sutton) belonging to Phylum Ascomycota; Class Sordariomycetes; Order Diapothales; Family Diaporthaceae. One pathogenic isolate was detected in the seed lot from Boaco and seed lot no. 5 from Estelí.
Discussion
Seedborne pathogenic fungi in beans used for seeds reduce germination, emergence, growth, and yield, whereas in beans used for food they can reduce the nutritional value or produce toxins making the beans unsuitable for consumption [21]. The fungi can be transmitted as contaminants that adhere to the seed coat, or infect the seed, which is considered as the main mechanism of seed-mediated transmission. This work showed that germination in seedlots of common bean (‘INTA Rojo’) from four important bean production areas in Nicaragua was always less than 40% and as low as 16%, which is potentially disastrous for the farmers. Subsequently, we detected 87 pathogenic fungal isolates from surface-sterilized beans in six seed lots of INTA Rojo. Results showed that those seed lots that exhibited better emergence gave rise to a larger proportion of healthy and vigorous seedlings, whereas poor emergence was associated with a larger proportion of seedlings that emerged but were abnormal, grew poorly, and/or were affected by disease-like symptoms.
The pathogenic fungi isolated in this study were classified phenotypically to eight distinguishable groups (phenogroups) based on growth and morphological characteristics and further identified by analysis of the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences [22,23]. The most common fungi among the pathogenic isolates were Fusarium (F. chlamydosporum, F. equiseti, F. incarnatum), L. theobromae, P. citrinum, and M. phaseolina. These fungi are discussed individually below, and management options are presented together at the end.
Fusarium spp. were detected in seedlots in all four regions surveyed in Nicaragua. Fusarium species are soil-borne fungi that can cause rot of the root, stem, and fruit or vascular wilt in a wide range of crop plants, and they survive as saprophytes [24]. The wide range of different races contributes to the taxonomic complexity [25,26]. Mycotoxin production by Fusarium spp. is of concern to human and animal health in many field crops, including common beans [27–29]. There is scant previous information about seedborne infections of F. incarnatum in common beans or its pathogenicity on common bean seedlings. However, F. equiseti is known to infect many forms of bean, including bush bean (P. lunatus), kidney bean and haricot bean (P. vulgaris) [30,31], as well as faba bean (Vicia faba L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris L.) [31], cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) [32], soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] [33], and mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek.] [30]. F. equiseti occurs mainly in tropical and subtropical regions, but it has also been found in temperate areas in Europe and North America [34,35]. It is highly adaptable to many cropping systems and is capable of infecting seeds, roots, tubers, and fruit [36]. F. incarnatum can infect other crops, such as Capsicum annum L. [37] and Ziziphus jujube Mill. [38]. The third species, F. chlamydosporum, has been isolated previously from soil, beans, and maize roots in Kenya [39]. Problems with Fusarium spp. are experienced in common bean production also elsewhere in the Central American region. In Cuba, half of the seedlots surveyed for fungi were found to contain Fusarium spp. [40], including F. solani f. sp. phaseoli causing substantial yield losses in common bean crops in many regions of Mexico [41]. Studies on disease epidemiology and genetic diversity of Fusarium spp. that infect common bean have been initiated in Mexico [41] and are needed in Nicaragua.
L. theobromae was rather abundant in beans harvested in Boaco and Carazo. Genetic diversification of this species was apparent with two clusters being identified in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig 5). Genetic differences correlated geographically, because the isolates from Boaco and Carazo were assigned to different clusters. Common bean seedlings and seedlings of lima bean displayed similar symptoms of dieback, decay and cankers following infection with L. theobromae. No difference in pathogenicity was observed between the two genetically distinguishable groups of isolates. Little is known about diseases of common bean caused by L. theobromae, although it causes disease in more than 500 plant species [42–44] and is endemic to tropical and subtropical regions. It can also colonize plant tissues without any visible symptoms of infection and live as an endophyte or saprophyte [43,45–48]. The change from a non-pathogenic lifestyle to a disease-causing pathogen may be associated with host stress [45,48,49]. The spores of L. theobromae are disseminated by rain and wind [50]. Use of fungicides and resistant/tolerant cultivars may be helpful to decrease the occurrence of L. theobromae infections [51].
M. phaseolina was detected in beans harvested from three of the four surveyed regions. In this species as well, genetic diversification was observed, resulting in placement of the isolates into three clades based on the phylogenetic analysis (data not shown). Besides several Nicaraguan isolates, one clade included isolates of M. phaseolina from Vigna radiata L. (China), Fragaria × ananassa (Spain), Pisum sativum (Australia), and Fraxinus sp. (USA). These results are consistent with previously reported variation in morphology and virulence among isolates of M. phaseolina in plants comprising common bean, soybean, and other crops [51,52]. According to Su et al. [53] the host specialization of M. phaseolina is apparent in corn but not in sorghum, cotton, or soybean. Indeed, M. phaseolina is one of the commonest pathogens of common bean and considered a polyphagous pathogen able to infect several hundred plant species [54–56]. This fungus survives in the soil as microsclerotia and in the debris of infected plants. Large populations of M. phaseolina in the soil may develop when the host is susceptible and cropped in consecutive years, and the pathogen is redistributed by tillage practices. Furthermore, some strains of M. phaseolina have adapted to certain types of climate and soil [57]. Increased salinity of soil stimulates infection and may increase disease severity [56].
Seven isolates of Colletotrichum capsici (Boaco and Matagalpa) and one isolate of C. gloeosporioides (Boaco) were detected in the seedlots. ITS sequences of C. capsici isolates from Boaco and Matagalpa were identical to each other and to those from pepper in Malaysia, India, and Mexico (Fig 6; S1 Table). The ITS region of the C. gloeosporioides isolate from Boaco was identical to an isolate characterized from common bean in Brazil, and also identical to an isolate from soybean (Taiwan) and lemon (New Zealand). Hence, genetically similar isolates seem to be widely distributed and able to infect a wide range of host species. C. capsici is typically a pathogen of pepper (Capsicum spp.), but all C. capsici isolates (and the C. gloeosporioides isolate) detected in seed beans in our study were found to cause cankers and severe wilting in inoculated lima bean seedlings. Bean anthracnose is typically caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. & Magnus) Briosi & Cavara and considered one of the most severe diseases in beans. In navy bean, for example, infection of 7% of bean seeds was sufficient to cause statistically significant yield losses [58]. Anthracnose damages foliage, stems, and pods and reduces germination as well as product quality and yield. In the absence of susceptible host plants, Colletotrichum spp. survive over growth seasons as mycelia on infested crop residues as saprophytes, or in infected seeds. Plants can be infected at any growth stage. Symptoms are more obvious in mature plants and under disease-conducive moist conditions [9,59,60].
Corynespora cassiicola was detected in one seedlot sampled in Carazo and its ITS sequence was identical to many reference sequences of this species retrieved from the NCBI database. While common bean is indeed a host for C. cassiicola and suffers from target spot disease caused by the fungus [61], our study seems to be one of the few showing that C. cassiicola is not eliminated by surface sterilization of seed beans and is hence a truly seedborne pathogen in this species. Furthermore, the two characterized isolates caused very severe symptoms in the inoculated lima bean seedlings. Host species adaptation is suggested by studies showing that the most virulent isolates of C. cassiicola on common bean are those that have been isolated from that species, as compared with isolates from other crops such as basil, cowpea, cucumber, papaya, soybean, sweetpotato, or tomato [61]. C. cassiicola is an aggressive facultative parasite able to infect many legume species and considered one of the most damaging pathogens of soybean crops in Brazil [62] and Korea [63]. C. cassiicola sporulates on plant debris and also survives in soil without plant residues [64,65]. The conidia infect leaves and stem. The fungus requires rather high soil temperature (15–20°C) and moisture for infection and disease development. The disease cycle is completed in 7–10 days [66].
Two isolates of Diaporthe sp. (synonym Phomopsis sp.) [67], one each from Boaco and Estelí, were characterized from the common bean seedlots. When they were used to inoculate lima bean seedlings, white mycelia developed as described in soybeans that suffer from stem and pod blight disease following infection with Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae/Phomopsis sojae [29]. Furthermore, severe symptoms of necrosis and wilting developed in the inoculated lima bean seedlings. Diaporthe spp. are pathogens of many different plant species and cause seed rot, stem cankers, lesions, and pod blight [68], but in common beans they are simply endophytes [69]. Therefore, it is remarkable that the two isolates of Diaporthe from seedlot of ‘INTA Rojo’ caused severe disease symptoms in common bean seedlings (Fig 4). Recently, D. masirevicii and D. miriciae were found associated with cankers on soybean and mung bean plants in Australia [68]. Analysis of the ITS regions alone is insufficient to identify the species in the genus Diaporthe [69]. It therefore seems warranted to further characterize the pathogenic isolates described in this study using, e.g., multilocus phylogenetic analysis [69].
Two genera, Penicillium and Aspergillus, were found to be associated with post-harvest losses in ‘INTA Rojo’. Penicillium grew out from a few seed beans of all seedlots, in spite of prior surface-sterilization, and isolates caused mild necrotic symptoms on inoculated bean seedlings. ITS sequences identified the species as P. citrinum. A survey of seedlots in Taiwan and Ontario also revealed a number of different Penicillium spp. in surface-sterilized beans, albeit not P. citrinum [27]. Four isolates of Aspergillus flavus were obtained from two seedlots (Estelí and Matagalpa). All of them caused cankers and mild necrosis on inoculated bean seedlings, consistent with a previous study that reported necrosis on roots and stem as well as leaf spots in various legumes caused by this species [70]. Post-harvest rotting of cereal grains and legumes causes large economical losses as it may destroy 10–30% of the yield—or even higher portions in developing countries [29]. However, the most worrying aspect about A. flavus is its potential in many different crops to produce aflatoxins known to be among the most potent carcinogens of biological origin [71].
Better control of the pathogenic fungi detected in common bean is needed in Nicaragua for improvement of bean production, reduction of yield losses and minimizing health risks caused by fungal toxins and allergens. All fungi found to infect common bean in this study can infect also a wide range of other plant species that act as possible pathogen reservoirs for infection of common bean crops. The efficient dissemination of conidia by rain and wind constitutes another challenge for control of the pathogens. Resistant cultivars and integrated pest management play important roles in preventing seedborne fungal diseases of common bean [72]. For example, control of charcoal rot caused by M. phaseolina in beans depends on crop management comprising the use of resistant cultivars, crop rotation, avoiding too dense a canopy, controlling soil moisture and water stress with irrigation and tillage practices, and, potentially, the use of biological control [73,74]. Trichoderma spp. have shown good antagonistic capacity against anthracnose [75] caused by C. capsici that was one of the pathogens detected in common bean in this study. Crop rotation requires careful planning. For example in soybean production, crop rotation with maize is essential for reducing infection pressure by C. cassiicola [76], but it is not suitable for control of Diaporthe spp., because maize supports this genus from one cropping season to the next [68]. Control of Fusarium spp., L. theobromae, C. capsici [72,75] and other fungi with fungicides to prevent mycotoxin production and excessive yield losses is possible but causes another health risk to farmers and consumers [28,29]. Finally, the rather common occurrence of Penicillium and Aspergillus in the stored beans in Nicaragua causes a risk for exposure to mycotoxins and allergens and calls for better management of bean crops in the field and improved post-harvest practices [22,77].
In conclusion, this survey of pathogenic fungi in seedlots of common bean, which focused on the nationally important cultivar ‘INTA Rojo’ grown in the four main bean production regions in Nicaragua, revealed eight fungal genera harmful to seed quality as judged on their ability to infect and damage naturally infected common bean seedlings and inoculated lima bean seedlings. Many of these fungi are well known pathogens that cause seed decay, root rot, stem cankers, wilting, necrosis, and/or death of infected bean plants; for example, Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., and A. flavus are the predominant species detected in common bean in Cuba [40]. On the other hand, many of the seedborne pathogenic fungi detected in ‘INTA Rojo’ were previously unreported in Nicaragua, and reports on occurrence of some, such as F. incarnatum, L. theobromae, C. cassiicola, and Diaporthe, as seedborne pathogens of common bean are rare elsewhere. The incidences of the pathogenic fungi differed between seedlots, which calls for further study to understand the basis of differences in seed quality and use of the results to improve handling and storage conditions of seed beans. The results provide a knowledgebase for further development of diagnostic tools for seed health inspection and seed certification. It is also important to continue studies on epidemiology, ecology, and control of the pathogenic fungi of common bean in the field and to improve control of the diseases by integrated crop management and use of certified seeds and resistant varieties.
Supporting Information
S1 Table. Fungal ITS sequences determined in this study, and the reference sequences retrieved from databases and used for comparison.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168662.s001
(DOC)
S1 Fig. Symptoms caused by the fungi isolated from seedlots of common bean in Nicaragua and inoculated to healthy lima beans under controlled conditions.
Photographs were taken at 20 dpi. Panel (a) Fusarium spp., (b) Macrophomina phaseolina, (c) Lasiodiplodia theobromae, (d) Penicillium citrinum, (e) Colletotrichum capsici (photos A and B) and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (photos C and D), and (f) Aspergillus flavus. The right-most photograph in each panel shows the mock-inoculated control (photograph E in panels a, c and e, and photograph D in panels b, d and f).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168662.s002
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Mycelia and spores of pathogenic fungi isolated from seed lots of common bean in Nicaragua and photographed following growth on PDA agar for 12 and 13 days.
For microscopy, hyphae and spores were stained with lactophenol cotton blue. (a) Fusarium equiseti (NCBI accession no. HQ625615): A, mycelia; B, characteristic sickle-like spores. (b) Lasiodiplodia theobromae (HQ625630): A, mycelia; B, hyphae including mature two-celled dark brown conidia with striations (arrowhead). (c) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (KX641191): A, mycelia; B, spores.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168662.s003
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Aldo Rojas and Dr. Oswalt Jimenez, Nicaragua, for collaboration and sharing valuable information. This study was part of the Nicaragua-Finland Agrobiotechnology and Human Capacity Building Program (NIFAPRO) carried out jointly by the Nicaraguan Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) and University of Helsinki. Participation of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Forestry of Nicaragua (MAGFOR), National University of Agriculture of Nicaragua (UNA), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, and Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland in the Steering Committee of NIFAPRO is gratefully acknowledged.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: DM JPTV.
- Data curation: DM.
- Formal analysis: DM.
- Funding acquisition: JPTV.
- Investigation: DM.
- Methodology: DM JPTV.
- Project administration: DM JPTV.
- Resources: DM JPTV.
- Software: N/A.
- Supervision: JPTV.
- Validation: DM JPTV.
- Visualization: DM.
- Writing – original draft: DM JPTV.
- Writing – review & editing: DM JPTV.
References
- 1.
FAOSTAT online database. 2014. Available: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/browse/G1/*/E.
- 2. Graham PH, Ranalli P. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crop Res. 1997; 53: 131–146.
- 3. Santalla M, Casquero PA, Ron AM de. Yield and yield components from intercropping bush bean cultivars with maize. J Agr Crop Sci. 1999; 183: 263–269.
- 4.
INTA (Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria). Guía tecnológica para el cultivo de granos básicos. Nicaragua: Revista Press; 2002.
- 5. Jiménez O, Korpelainen H, Rojas A, Elomaa P, Valkonen JPT. Genetic purity of the common bean seed generations (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. ‘INTA ROJO’) as tested with microsatellite markers. Seed Sci Technol. 2012; 40: 73–85.
- 6. Jiménez OR, Korpelainen H. Preliminary evaluation of F1 generation derived from two common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Nicaragua. Plant Breed. 2013; 132: 205–210.
- 7. Valkonen JPT, Koponen H. Seed borne fungi of Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis), their pathogenicity and control. Plant Pathol. 1990; 39: 510–516.
- 8. Mancini V, Murolo S, Romanazzi G. Diagnostic methods for detecting fungal pathogens on vegetable seeds. Plant Pathol. 2016; 65: 691–703.
- 9.
Schwartz HF, Steadman JR, Hall R, Forster RL. Compendium of bean diseases. Minnesota, USA: The American Phytopathological Society; 2005.
- 10. Naseri B, Mousavi SS. Root rot pathogens in field soil, roots and seeds in relation to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), disease and seed production. Int J Pest Management. 2008; 61: 60–67.
- 11. Delgado G. Nicaraguan fungi: A checklist of hyphomycetes. Mycotaxon. 2011; 115: 534.
- 12. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci Technol Suppl. 27; 1999.
- 13. Lehtonen MJ, Ahvenniemi P, Wilson PS, German-Kinnari , Valkonen JPT. Biological diversity of Rhizoctonia solani (AG-3) in a Northern potato-cultivation environment in Finland. Plant Pathol. 2008; 57: 141–151.
- 14.
Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JC, Smith JA, et al. Short protocols in molecular biology: A compendium of methods from current protocols in molecular biology. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Press; 1995.
- 15.
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. editors. New York, USA: Academic Press Inc; 1990. pp. 315–322.
- 16.
Arx JA von. The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Vaduz, Germany: AR Ganter Verlage; 1974.
- 17.
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH. Compendium of soil fungi. Vol. I and II. London, UK: Academic Press; 1980.
- 18.
Seifert K. Fusarium interactive key (Fuskey). Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; 1996.
- 19.
Dickman MB. Colletotrichum. In: Kronstad JW, editor. Fungal pathology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 127–147.
- 20. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software version 4.0 (MEGA 4). Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24: 1596–1599. pmid:17488738
- 21.
Waller JM, Lenné JM, Waller SJ. Plant pathologist’s pocketbook. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2002.
- 22. Anderson IC, Parkin PI. Detection of active soil fungi by RT-PCR amplification of precursor rRNA molecules. J Microbiol Methods. 2007; 68: 248–253. pmid:17045683
- 23. Terashima Y, Ogiwara K, Seki A, Kojima M, Kubo C, Fujiie A. Primers based on specific ITS sequences of rDNAs for PCR detection of two fairy ring fungi of turfgrass, Vascellum pratense and Lycoperdon pusillum. Mycoscience. 2002; 43: 261–265.
- 24. Silvestro LB, Stenglein SA, Forjan H, Dinolfo MI, Arambarri AM, Manso L, et al. Occurrence and distribution of soil Fusarium species under wheat crop in zero tillage. Spanish J Agr Res. 2013; 11: 72–79.
- 25. Aoki T, O'Donnell K, Geiser DM. Systematics of key phytopathogenic Fusarium species: current status and future. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2014; 80: 189–201.
- 26. Henrique FH, Morais Carbonel SA, Fumiko Ito M, Ribeiro Gonçalves JG, Ramos Sasseron G, Chiorato AF. Classification of physiological races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli in common bean. Plant Protect. 2015; 74; 84–92.
- 27. Tseng TC, Tu JC, Tsean SS. Mycoflora and mycotoxins in dry bean (Phaseoulus vulgaris) produced in Taiwan and in Ontario, Canada. Microbiology. 1995; 36: 229–234.
- 28. Diepeningen AD van, Hoog S de. Challenges in Fusarium, a trans-kingdom pathogen. Mycopathologia. 2016; 181: 161–163. pmid:26966007
- 29.
Agrios GN. Plant pathology, 5th ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2005.
- 30. Munimbazi C, Bullerman LB. Molds and mycotoxins in foods from Burundi. J Food Protection. 1996; 59: 869–875.
- 31. Chaudhary RG, Kaur A. Wilt disease as a cause of shift from lentil cultivation in Sangod Tehsil of Kota, Rajasthan. Indian J Pulses Res. 2002; 15: 193–194.
- 32. Rodriguez AA, Menezes M. Identification and pathogenic characterization of endophytic Fusarium species from cowpea seeds. Mycopathology. 2005; 159: 79–85.
- 33. Koning G, Hamman B, Eicker A, Van de Venter HA. First report of Fusarium equiseti on South African soybean cultivars. Plant Dis. 1995; 79: 754.
- 34.
Booth C. Fusarium equiseti. IMI descriptions of fungi and bacteria, sheet 571. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1978.
- 35. Bosch U, Mirocha CJ. Toxin production by Fusarium species from sugar beets and natural occurrence of zearalenone in beets and beet fibers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992; 58: 3233–3239. pmid:1444361
- 36. Goswami RS, Dong Y, Punja ZK. Host range and mycotoxin production by Fusarium equiseti isolates originating from ginseng fields. Can J Plant Pathol. 2008; 30: 155–160.
- 37. Ramdial H, Hosein F, Rampersad SN. First report of Fusarium incarnatum associated with fruit disease of bell peppers in Trinidad. Plant Dis. 2016; 100: 526.
- 38. Guo KF, Syn J, Zhao SF, He L. Black spot disease of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujaba) caused by Fusarium incarnatum in China. Plant Dis. 2016; 100: 529.
- 39. Okoth S, Siameto E. Suppression of Fusarium spp. in a maize and beans intercrop by soil fertility management. J Yeast Fungal Res. 2010; 1: 35–43.
- 40. Martínez de la parte E, Cantillo Pérez T, García D. Hongos asociados a semillas de Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivadas en Cuba. Biotecnología Vegetal. 2014; 14: 99–105.
- 41. Martinez-Garnica M, Nieto-Munoz F, Hernandez-Delgado S, Mayek-Perez N. Pathogenic and genetic characterization of Mexican isolates of Fusarium solani f. sp phaseoli (Burk.) Snyd. & Hans. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad del Zulia. 2014; 31: 539–557.
- 42.
Punithalingam E. Botrydiplodia theobromae. CMI descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria no. 519. Kew, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 1976.
- 43.
Punithalingam E. Plant diseases attributed to Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. Bibliotheca Mycologica Series; J Cramer; 1980.
- 44. Marques MW, Lima NB, Morais MA Jr, Barbosa MAG, Souza BO, Michereff SJ, et al. Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with mango in Brazil. Fungal Diversity. 2013; 61: 181–193.
- 45. Lima JS, Moreira RC, Cardoso JE, Cardoso JE, Valentim Martins MV, Pinto Viana FM. Caracterizacão cultural, morfológica e patogênica de Lasiodiplodia theobromae associado a frutíferas tropicais. Summa Phytopathologica. 2013; 39: 81–88.
- 46. Dugan FM, Lupien SL, Osuagwu AN, Uyoh EA, Okpako E, Kisha T. New records of Lasiodiplodia theobromae in seeds of Tetrapleura tetraptera from Nigeria and fruit of Cocos nucifera from Mexico. J Phytopathol. 2016; 164: 65–68.
- 47. Machado AR, Pinho DB, Oliviera Saulo A.S. de, Pereira Olinto L. New occurrences of Botryosphaeriaceae causing black root of cassava in Brazil. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2014; 39: 464–470.
- 48. Rosado AWC, Machado AR, Freire FCO, Pereira OL. Phylogeny, identification, pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia associated with postharvest stem-end rot of coconut in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2016; 100: 561–568.
- 49. Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants: diversity, ecology and impact. Fungal Biol Rev. 2007; 21: 90–106.
- 50. Arauz LF, Umaña G. Diagnostico e incidencia de las enfermedades pos cosecha del mango en Costa Rica. Agronomia Costarricence 1986; 10: 89–99.
- 51. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Variation among isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia bataticola) from the same soybean plant. Phytopathology. 1972; 62: 1108.
- 52. Echavez-Badel R, Perdomo A. Characterization and comparative pathogenicity of two Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from Puerto Rico. J Agric Univ Puerto Rico. 1991; 75: 19–421.
- 53. Su G, Suh SO, Schneider W, Russin JS. Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology. 2000; 91: 120–126.
- 54.
Farr DF, Rossman AY. Fungal databases. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture: Systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory. Available: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/.
- 55.
Wyllie TD. Charcoal rot. In: Sinclair JB, Backman PA, editors. Compendium of soybean diseases. Minnesota, USA: The American Phytopathological Society; 1988. pp 30–33.
- 56. Pei You M, Colmer TD, Barbetti MJ. Salinity drives host reaction in Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) to Macrophomina phaseolina. Func Plant Biol. 2011; 38: 984–992.
- 57. Sexton ZF, Hughes T, Wise KA. Analyzing isolate variability of Macrophomina phaseolina from a regional perspective. Crop Protect. 2016; 81: 9–13.
- 58. Chen YY, Conner RL, Gillard CL. A quantitative real-time PCR assay for detection of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in navy bean seeds. Plant Pathol. 2013; 62: 900–907.
- 59.
Anon. Vegetable production training manual. AVRDC publication no. 90–328. ISBN 92-9058-039-9. Shanhua, Tainan: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center; 1990.
- 60. Yang HC, Hartman GL. Methods and evaluation of soybean genotypes for resistance to Colletotrichum truncatum. Plant Dis. 2015; 99: 143–148.
- 61. Dixon LJ, Schlub RL, Pernezny K, Datnoff LE. Host specialization and phylogenetic diversity of Corynespora cassiicola. Phytopathology 2009; 99: 1015–1027. pmid:19671003
- 62. Teramoto A, Machado TA, Dos Santos LM, Volf MR, Meyer MC, Cunha MG da. Reacão de cultivares de soja à Corynespora cassiicola. Trop Plant Pathol. 2013; 38: 68–71.
- 63. Kwon JH, Jee HJ, Park CS. Corynespora leaf spot of balsam pear (Momordica charantia L.) caused by Corynespora cassiicola in Korea. Plant Path J. 2005; 21: 164–166.
- 64. Navas M, Subero LJ. Efecto de cinco fungicidas sobre Corynespora cassiicola (Berk & Curt). Wei en semilla de ajonjolí (Sesamun indicum L). Revista Facultad de Agronomia (Maracay). 2015; 21: 121–127.
- 65. Lisboa WS, Macedo DM, Silva M, et al. First report of Corynespora cassiicola on Pueraria phaseoloides (tropical kudzu). Australasian Plant Dis. Notes. 2016; 11: 17.
- 66.
Brooks F. List of plant diseases in American Samoa. Land grant technical report 41. Pago Pago, American Samoa: American Samoa Community College; 2004.
- 67.
Webster J, Weber RWS. Introduction to fungi. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
- 68. Thompson SM, Tan YP, Shivas RG, Neate SM, Morin L, Bissett A, et al. Green and brown bridges between weeds and crops reveal novel Diaporthe species in Australia. Persoonia. 2015; 35: 39–49. pmid:26823627
- 69. Santos TT dos, Souza T de, Queiroz CB de, Araújo EF de, Pereira OL, Queiroz MV de. High genetic variability in endophytic fungi from the genus Diaporthe isolated from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 2016; 120: 388–401. pmid:26541097
- 70. Surendranatha REC, Sudhakar C, Eswara RNP. Aflatoxin contamination in groundnut induced by Aspergillus flavus type fungi: a critical review. Int J Appl Biol Pharmaceutical Tech. 2011; 2: 180–192.
- 71. Probst C, Schulthess F, Cotty PJ. Impact of Aspergillus section Flavi community structure on the development of lethal levels of aflatoxins in Kenyan maize (Zea mays). J Appl Microbiol 2010; 108: 600–610. pmid:19674186
- 72. Diniz Cavalcante R, Waléria Guerreiro L, Brainer Martins R, Tovar-Pedraza JM, Saraiva Câmara MP. Thiophanate-methyl sensitivity and fitness in Lasiodiplodia theobromae populations from papaya in Brazil. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014; 140: 251–259.
- 73.
White DG. Compendium of corn diseases. Minnesota, USA: The American Phytopathological Society; 1999.
- 74. Sharma M, Ghosh R, Pande S. Dry root rot [Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler]: an emerging disease of chickpea—where do we stand? Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect. 2015; 48: 797–812.
- 75.
Smith KL. Peppers. In: Precheur RJ, editor. Ohio Vegetable Production Guide. Columbus Ohio: Ohio State University Extension; 2000. pp. 166–173.
- 76.
Anon. Manual de diffusion técnica de la soya. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: FUNDACRUZ; 2006. pp. 84–102.
- 77. Prester L. Indoor exposure to mould allergens. Arh Hig Toksikol 2011; 62: 371–380.