Recent manuscripts
Archive
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Open Access
Indexing
Contact us
Authorship & COI
Principles of Transparency Checklist
Publication Ethics
Crossmark
Data Policies
Supporting Diversity
Instructions to authors (PDF)
Manuscript Types
Manuscript Formatting
How to submit
Special Publications & Reprints
Preprints
RESEARCH PAPER
Economic evaluation of an exercise-counselling intervention to enhance smoking cessation outcomes: The Fit2Quit trial
Ralph Maddison
2,6
1
University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
2
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
3
Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
4
UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
5
School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
6
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Submission date: 2016-11-22
Acceptance date: 2017-03-20
Publication date: 2017-03-29
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2017;15(March):21
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
In the Fit2Quit randomised controlled trial, insufficiently-active adult cigarette smokers who contacted Quitline for support to quit smoking were randomised to usual Quitline support or to also receive ≤10 face-to-face and telephone exercise-support sessions delivered by trained exercise facilitators over the 24-week trial. This paper aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of an exercise-counselling intervention added to Quitline compared to Quitline alone in the Fit2Quit trial.
Methods:
Within-trial and lifetime cost-effectiveness were assessed. A published Markov model was adapted, with smokers facing increased risks of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Results:
Over 24 weeks, the incremental programme cost per participant in the intervention was NZ$428 (US$289 or €226; purchasing power parity-adjusted [PPP]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for seven-day point prevalence measured at 24-week follow-up was NZ$31,733 (US$21,432 or €16,737 PPP-adjusted) per smoker abstaining. However, for the 52% who adhered to the intervention (≥7 contacts), the ICER for point prevalence was NZ$3,991 (US$2,695 or €2,105 PPP-adjusted). In this adherent subgroup, the Markov model estimated 0.057 and 0.068 discounted quality-adjusted life-year gains over the lifetime of 40-year-old males (ICER: NZ$4,431; US$2,993 or €2,337 PPP-adjusted) and females (ICER: NZ$2,909; US$1,965 or €1,534 PPP-adjusted).
Conclusions:
The exercise-counselling intervention will only be cost-effective if adherence is a minimum of ≥7 intervention calls, which in turn leads to a sufficient number of quitters for health gains.
Trial registration:
Australasian Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12609000637246
In the Fit2Quit randomised controlled trial, insufficiently-active adult cigarette smokers who contacted Quitline for support to quit smoking were randomised to usual Quitline support or to also receive ≤10 face-to-face and telephone exercise-support sessions delivered by trained exercise facilitators over the 24-week trial. This paper aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of an exercise-counselling intervention added to Quitline compared to Quitline alone in the Fit2Quit trial.
Methods:
Within-trial and lifetime cost-effectiveness were assessed. A published Markov model was adapted, with smokers facing increased risks of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Results:
Over 24 weeks, the incremental programme cost per participant in the intervention was NZ$428 (US$289 or €226; purchasing power parity-adjusted [PPP]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for seven-day point prevalence measured at 24-week follow-up was NZ$31,733 (US$21,432 or €16,737 PPP-adjusted) per smoker abstaining. However, for the 52% who adhered to the intervention (≥7 contacts), the ICER for point prevalence was NZ$3,991 (US$2,695 or €2,105 PPP-adjusted). In this adherent subgroup, the Markov model estimated 0.057 and 0.068 discounted quality-adjusted life-year gains over the lifetime of 40-year-old males (ICER: NZ$4,431; US$2,993 or €2,337 PPP-adjusted) and females (ICER: NZ$2,909; US$1,965 or €1,534 PPP-adjusted).
Conclusions:
The exercise-counselling intervention will only be cost-effective if adherence is a minimum of ≥7 intervention calls, which in turn leads to a sufficient number of quitters for health gains.
Trial registration:
Australasian Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12609000637246
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, Wollum A, Sanman E, Wulf S, Lopez AD. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(2):183–92.
2.
Braillon A. Curbing the tobacco epidemic: employing behavioral strategies or rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic? Prev Med. 2015;73:28–9.
3.
Ussher MH, Taylor AH, Faulkner G. Exercise interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD002295. doi:10.1002/ 14651858.CD002295.pub5.
4.
Maddison R, Roberts V, Bullen C, McRobbie H, Jiang Y, Prapavessis H, Glover M, Taylor S, Brown P. Design and conduct of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to enhance smoking-cessation outcomes with exercise: the Fit2Quit study. Ment Health and Phys Act. 2010;3(2):92–101.
5.
Swinburn B, Walter L, Arroll B, Tilyard M, Russell D. The green prescription study: a randomized controlled trial of written exercise advice provided by general practitioners. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(2):288–91.
6.
US Department of Health & Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996. p. 137.
7.
Maddison R, Roberts V, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Prapavessis H, Glover M, Jiang Y, Brown P, Leung W, Taylor S, et al. Exercise counseling to enhance smoking cessation outcomes: the Fit2Quit randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(2):194–204.
8.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjorstrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.
9.
Sullivan P, Slejko J, Sculpher M, Ghushchyan V. Catalogue of EQ-5D scores for the United Kingdom. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(6):800–4.
10.
NZ Health Information Service. In: NZHIS, editor. National Minimum Dataset. 2006 to 2007. Wellington: New Zealand Health Information Service; 2007.
11.
Tillmann M, Silcock J. A comparison of smokers’ and ex-smokers’ healthrelated quality of life. J Public Health Med. 1997;19(3):268–73.
12.
Xie J, Wu E, Zheng Z, Croft J, Greenlund K, Mensah G, et al. Impact of stroke on health-related quality of life in the noninstitutionalized population in the United States. Stroke. 2006;37(10):2567–72.
13.
Health System Costs of Tobacco-Related Diseases [ http://www.otago.ac.nz/ wellington/departments/publichealth/research/bode3/otago075379.html ]. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
14.
Gordon L, Hirst N, Young R, Brown P. Within a smoking-cessation program, what impact does genetic information on lung cancer need to have to demonstrate cost-effectiveness? Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation. 2010;8:18.
15.
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50.
16.
Moore SC, Lee I-M, Weiderpass E, Campbell PT, Sampson JN, Kitahara CM, Keadle SK, Arem H, de Gonzalez AB, Hartge P. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):816–25.
17.
Roberts V, Dale LP, Dorey E, Bullen C, Maddison R. An exercise programme for smoking cessation: perceptions of the Fit2quit trial intervention. J Smok Cessat. 2014; FirstView:1–8.
18.
Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Snow MG. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(1):23.
19.
Stapleton J, West R. A direct method and ICER tables for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in general populations: application to a new cytisine trial and other examples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(4):463–71.
20.
Guerriero C, Cairns J, Roberts I, Rodgers A, Whittaker R, Free C. The costeffectiveness of smoking cessation support delivered by mobile phone text messaging: Txt2stop. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(5):789–97.
21.
Hassandra M, Lintunen T, Kettunen T, Vanhala M, Toivonen H-M, Kinnunen K, Heikkinen R. Effectiveness of a mobile phone app for adults that uses physical activity as a tool to manage cigarette craving after smoking cessation: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(4):e125.
22.
Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Borland R, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD006611. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub3.
23.
Cahill K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R. Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD004307. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD004307.pub5.
24.
Cahill K, Lancaster T. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD003440. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD003440.pub4.
25.
Stapleton J. Cigarette smoking prevalence, cessation and relapse. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;7:187–203.
26.
Etter J-F, Stapleton J. Nicotine replacement therapy for long-term smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2006;15:280–5.
27.
Ministry of Health. Selected cancers 2012, 2013 & 2014 (provisional). Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015.
28.
Grey C, Wells S, Riddell T, Kerr A, Gentles D, Pylypchuk R. A comparative analysis of the cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles of Pacific peoples and Europeans living in New Zealand assessed in routine primary care: PREDICT CVD-11. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1309):62–75.
29.
Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Smoking, quitting, and the risk of cardiovascular disease among women and men in the Asia-Pacific region. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:1036–45.
30.
Marshall R, Milne R, Lynn R, Jackson R. Quantifying the effect of age on short-term and long-term case fatality in 14,000 patients with incident cases of cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(2):179–84.
31.
Statistics New Zealand. New Zealand period life tables: 2012–14. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2015.
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
Nick Wilson, Anna Davies, Naomi Brewer, Nhung Nghiem, Linda Cobiac, Tony Blakely
Population Health Metrics
Nick Wilson, Anna Davies, Naomi Brewer, Nhung Nghiem, Linda Cobiac, Tony Blakely
Population Health Metrics
2.
Prioritization of intervention domains to prevent cardiovascular disease: a country-level case study using global burden of disease and local data
Nick Wilson, Christine Cleghorn, Nhung Nghiem, Tony Blakely
Population Health Metrics
Nick Wilson, Christine Cleghorn, Nhung Nghiem, Tony Blakely
Population Health Metrics
3.
Smoking cessation economic benefits in a human capital approach: emerging evidence in Jordan
Saba Madae’en, Rasha Istaiteyeh, Mohammad Adeinat, Nour Obeidat, Rasha Baninasur, Mansour Haddad
Pharmacia
Saba Madae’en, Rasha Istaiteyeh, Mohammad Adeinat, Nour Obeidat, Rasha Baninasur, Mansour Haddad
Pharmacia
4.
Physical Therapist’s Prescription Regarding Benefits of Active Life Style of Patients
Saher PASHA, Hira RAJPUT, Muhammad KHAN, Sumeet KUMAR, Muhammad CHUGHTAİ, Rabia SİDDİQ
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Saher PASHA, Hira RAJPUT, Muhammad KHAN, Sumeet KUMAR, Muhammad CHUGHTAİ, Rabia SİDDİQ
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
5.
Motivational support intervention to reduce smoking and increase physical activity in smokers not ready to quit: the TARS RCT
Adrian Taylor, Tom Thompson, Adam Streeter, Jade Chynoweth, Tristan Snowsill, Wendy Ingram, Michael Ussher, Paul Aveyard, Rachael Murray, Tess Harris, Colin Green, Jane Horrell, Lynne Callaghan, Colin Greaves, Lisa Price, Lucy Cartwright, Jonny Wilks, Sarah Campbell, Dan Preece, Siobhan Creanor
Health Technology Assessment
Adrian Taylor, Tom Thompson, Adam Streeter, Jade Chynoweth, Tristan Snowsill, Wendy Ingram, Michael Ussher, Paul Aveyard, Rachael Murray, Tess Harris, Colin Green, Jane Horrell, Lynne Callaghan, Colin Greaves, Lisa Price, Lucy Cartwright, Jonny Wilks, Sarah Campbell, Dan Preece, Siobhan Creanor
Health Technology Assessment
| eISSN: | 1617-9625 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
