skip to main content
10.1145/3345120.3345169acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Video Lecture Styles in MOOCs by Malaysian Polytechnics

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the utilisation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) grows in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) discipline, TVET students are required to use video lectures uploaded on MOOCs frequently. However, video lectures come in various styles and it may affect students' academic performance and psychology. Acknowledging this issue, this study aims to investigate the styles of TVET video lectures included in MOOCs by Malaysian Polytechnics. The video lectures (N=90) were analysed using video lecture style taxonomy [12]. It was found that the TVET video lectures can be categorised into fifteen styles in which nine of the styles were not listed in the taxonomy. Hence, the findings of this study can benefit TVET students and instructors in utilising video lectures effectively for teaching and learning. Additionally, it can also help researchers in corpus selection to further the study of TVET video lectures.

References

  1. Mustafa, Z. 2018. Boost to TVET. New Straits Times. November 21, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shaari, R., Ismail, Y., and Kok, R. A. 2018. Introduction to Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): The issues and challenges using MOOC as a teaching and learning method in Malaysian Polytechnic. Advanced Journal of Technical and Vocational Education. 2, 4, 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chauhan, J. and Goel, A. 2015. An analysis of video lecture in MOOC. In Proceedings of the 11th |International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (Lviv, Ukraine, May 14--16, 2015). ICTERI 2015. CEUR-WS.org. 1356, 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brecht, H. D. 2012. Learning from online video lectures. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11, 227--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hyon, S. 1997. Models of lecture discourse: Applications for academic listening and future research directions. Colloquium on Academic Listening within the EAP Curriculum. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnston, T. C. 2015. Lessons from MOOCs: VL and peer assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19, 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nordin, N., Norman, H., Embi, M.A., Mansor, A.Z., and Idris, F. 2016. Factors for development of learning content and task for MOOCs in an Asian context. International Education Studies. 9, 5, 48--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., and Rubin, R. 2014. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning Scale, 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Homer, B. D., Plass, J. L., and Blake, L. 2008. The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3, 786--797.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chen, C. M., and Wu, C. H. 2015. Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, Emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education. 80, 108--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Veletsianos, G. 2014. Why replacing teachers with automated education lacks imagination? The Conversation. August 30, 2014. Retrieved on 1 Jan 2019 from http://theconversation.com/why-replacing-teachers-with-automated-education-lacks-imagination-30842Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Crook, C. and Schofield, L. (2017). The video lectures. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 56--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chorianopoulos, K. 2018. A taxonomy of asynchronous instructional video styles. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 19, 1, 294--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rahim, M. I. and Shamsudin, S. 2019. Categorisation of TVET Video Lecture Designs in MOOC. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chorianopoulos, K., and Giannakos, M. N. 2013. Usability design for video lectures. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, 163--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Raihan, M. A. 2017. Interface design, emotions, and multimedia learning for TVET. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering Research and Practice, 116--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fardon, M. 2003. Internet streaming of lectures: A matter of style. In Proceedings of Educause Australasia Conference (Adelaide, Australia, May 6--9, 2003). 699--708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T., and Schmidt, P. 2015. Video and online learning: Critical reflections and findings from the field. HIIG Discussion Paper Series. No. 2015--02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Buchner, J. 2018. How to create Educational Videos: From watching passively to learning actively. Open Online Journal for Research and Education. Special Issue 12, September 2018, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Young, L. 1994. University lectures - Macro-structure and micro-features. In Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, J. Flowerdew, Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 159--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Video Lecture Styles in MOOCs by Malaysian Polytechnics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMT '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
      July 2019
      415 pages
      ISBN:9781450372107
      DOI:10.1145/3345120

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader