skip to main content
10.1145/3308560.3316489acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human Values and Attitudes towards Vaccination in Social Media

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Psychological, political, cultural, and even societal factors are entangled in the reasoning and decision-making process towards vaccination, rendering vaccine hesitancy a complex issue. Here, administering a series of surveys via a Facebook-hosted application, we study the worldviews of people that “Liked” supportive or vaccine resilient Facebook Pages. In particular, we assess differences in political viewpoints, moral values, personality traits, and general interests, finding that those sceptical about vaccination, appear to trust less the government, are less agreeable, while they are emphasising more on anti-authoritarian values. Exploring the differences in moral narratives as expressed in the linguistic descriptions of the Facebook Pages, we see that pages that defend vaccines prioritise the value of the family while the vaccine hesitancy pages are focusing on the value of freedom. Finally, creating embeddings based on the health-related likes on Facebook Pages, we explore common, latent interests of vaccine-hesitant people, showing a strong preference for natural cures. This exploratory analysis aims at exploring the potentials of a social media platform to act as a sensing tool, providing researchers and policymakers with insights drawn from the digital traces, that can help design communication campaigns that build confidence, based on the values that also appeal to the socio-moral criteria of people.

References

  1. Avnika B. Amin, Robert A. Bednarczyk, Cara E. Ray, Kala J. Melchiori, Jesse Graham, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger, and Saad B. Omer. 2017. Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy. Nature Human Behaviour 1(2017), 873–880. Issue 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Katie Attwell, Mark C Navin, Pier Luigi Lopalco, Christine Jestin, Sabine Reiter, and Saad B Omer. 2018. Recent vaccine mandates in the United States, Europe and Australia: a comparative study. Vaccine 36, 48 (2018), 7377–7384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Marina F Barnea and Shalom H Schwartz. 1998. Values and voting. Political psychology 19, 1 (1998), 17–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sandra J Bean. 2011. Emerging and continuing trends in vaccine opposition website content. Vaccine 29, 10 (2011), 1874–1880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cornelia Betsch, Noel T Brewer, Pauline Brocard, Patrick Davies, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Niels Haase, Julie Leask, Frank Renkewitz, Britta Renner, Valerie F Reyna, 2012. Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine 30, 25 (2012), 3727–3733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andrea Bonanomi, Alessandro Rosina, Ciro Cattuto, and Kyriaki Kalimeri. 2017. Understanding Youth Unemployment in Italy via Social Media Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Matthew Browne, Patricia Thomson, Matthew Justus Rockloff, and Gordon Pennycook. 2015. Going against the herd: psychological and cultural factors underlying the “vaccination confidence gap”. PLoS One 10, 9 (2015), e0132562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gabriela Capurro, Josh Greenberg, Eve Dubé, and Michelle Driedger. 2018. Measles, Moral Regulation and the Social Construction of Risk: Media Narratives of “Anti-Vaxxers” and the 2015 Disneyland Outbreak. Canadian Journal of Sociology 43, 1 (2018), 25–48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. JA Cassell, M Leach, MS Poltorak, CH Mercer, A Iversen, and JR Fairhead. 2006. Is the cultural context of MMR rejection a key to an effective public health discourse?Public health 120, 9 (2006), 783–794.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoon-Sik Cho, Greg Ver Steeg, Emilio Ferrara, and Aram Galstyan. 2016. Latent space model for multi-modal social data. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 447–458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paul T Costa Jr and Robert R McCrae. 1992. The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 6, 4 (1992), 343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gretchen J Domek, Sean T O’Leary, Sheana Bull, Michael Bronsert, Ingrid L Contreras-Roldan, Guillermo Antonio Bolaños Ventura, Allison Kempe, and Edwin J Asturias. 2018. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: Field testing the WHO SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy survey tool in Guatemala. Vaccine 36, 35 (2018), 5273–5281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Eve Dubé, Dominique Gagnon, Noni E MacDonald, 2015. Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine 33, 34 (2015), 4191–4203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Eve Dubé, Maryline Vivion, Chantal Sauvageau, Arnaud Gagneur, Raymonde Gagnon, and Maryse Guay. 2016. “Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?” Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mothers. Qualitative Health Research 26, 3 (2016), 411–425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Melissa B Gilkey, Annie-Laurie McRee, and Noel T Brewer. 2013. Forgone vaccination during childhood and adolescence: findings of a statewide survey of parents. Preventive medicine 56, 3-4 (2013), 202–206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Samuel D Gosling, Peter J Rentfrow, and William B Swann. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality 37, 6 (2003), 504–528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Palash Goyal and Emilio Ferrara. 2018. Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 151 (2018), 78–94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, and Brian A Nosek. 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.Journal of personality and social psychology 96, 5(2009), 1029.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshua Greenberg, Eve Dubé, and Michelle Driedger. 2017. Vaccine hesitancy: in search of the risk communication comfort zone. PLoS currents 9(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 855–864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham. 2007. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research 20, 1 (2007), 98–116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jonathan Haidt and Craig Joseph. 2004. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 133, 4 (2004), 55–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. EKOS Research Associates Inc.2018. Survey for the Development of the Childhood Vaccination Campaign. Vaccine (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva, Jesse Graham, Peter Ditto, and Jonathan Haidt. 2012. Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PloS one 7, 8 (2012), e42366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Daniel Jolley and Karen M Douglas. 2014. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS one 9, 2 (2014), e89177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kyriaki Kalimeri, Mariano G Beiró, Andrea Bonanomi, Alessandro Rosina, and Ciro Cattuto. 2019. Evaluation of Biases in Self-reported Demographic and Psychometric Information: Traditional versus Facebook-based Surveys. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07876(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kyriaki Kalimeri, Mariano G Beiró, Matteo Delfino, Robert Raleigh, and Ciro Cattuto. 2019. Predicting demographics, moral foundations, and human values from digital behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior 92 (2019), 428–445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Anna Kata. 2010. A postmodern Pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28, 7 (2010), 1709–1716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Allison Kennedy, Katherine LaVail, Glen Nowak, Michelle Basket, and Sarah Landry. 2011. Confidence about vaccines in the United States: understanding parents’ perceptions. Health affairs 30, 6 (2011), 1151–1159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Heidi J Larson, Louis Z Cooper, Juhani Eskola, Samuel L Katz, and Scott Ratzan. 2011. Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. The Lancet 378, 9790 (2011), 526–535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Carol HJ Lee, Isabelle M Duck, and Chris G Sibley. 2017. Personality and demographic correlates of New Zealanders’ confidence in the safety of childhood vaccinations. Vaccine 35, 45 (2017), 6089–6095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research 9, Nov (2008), 2579–2605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Henry B Mann and Donald R Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The annals of mathematical statistics(1947), 50–60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. Deepwalk: Online Learning of Social Representations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 701–710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bryan Perozzi and Steven Skiena. 2015. Exact Age Prediction in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW ’15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91–92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, and Jon Crowcroft. 2011. Our twitter profiles, our selves: Predicting personality with twitter. In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on. IEEE, 180–185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Leonardo FR Ribeiro, Pedro HP Saverese, and Daniel R Figueiredo. 2017. struc2vec: Learning node representations from structural identity. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 385–394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Daniel A Salmon, Matthew Z Dudley, Jason M Glanz, and Saad B Omer. 2015. Vaccine hesitancy: causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine 33(2015), D66–D71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Philipp Schmid, Dorothee Rauber, Cornelia Betsch, Gianni Lidolt, and Marie-Luisa Denker. 2017. Barriers of influenza vaccination intention and behavior–a systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005–2016. PloS one 12, 1 (2017), e0170550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ana Lucía Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo, Antonio Scala, Cornelia Betsch, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2018. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine 36, 25 (2018), 3606–3612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. David P Schmitt, Jüri Allik, Robert R McCrae, and Verónica Benet-Martínez. 2007. The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of cross-cultural psychology 38, 2 (2007), 173–212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Shalom H Schwartz. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 25. Elsevier, 1–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Gilla K Shapiro, Ovidiu Tatar, Eve Dube, Rhonda Amsel, Barbel Knauper, Anila Naz, Samara Perez, and Zeev Rosberger. 2018. The vaccine hesitancy scale: Psychometric properties and validation. Vaccine 36, 5 (2018), 660–667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Philip J Smith, Sharon G Humiston, Edgar K Marcuse, Zhen Zhao, Christina G Dorell, Cynthia Howes, and Beth Hibbs. 2011. Parental delay or refusal of vaccine doses, childhood vaccination coverage at 24 months of age, and the Health Belief Model. Public health reports 126, 2_suppl (2011), 135–146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jian Tang, Meng Qu, Mingzhe Wang, Ming Zhang, Jun Yan, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2015. Line: Large-scale information network embedding. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1067–1077. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Daixin Wang, Peng Cui, and Wenwu Zhu. 2016. Structural deep network embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1225–1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Przemyslaw M Waszak, Wioleta Kasprzycka-Waszak, and Alicja Kubanek. 2018. The spread of medical fake news in social media–The pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Runhua Xu, Remo M. Frey, Elgar Fleisch, and Alexander Ilic. 2016. Understanding the Impact of Personality Traits on Mobile App Adoption – Insights from a Large-Scale Field Study”. Computers in Human Behavior 62 (sep 2016), 244–256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ohid Yaqub, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Nick Sevdalis, and Joanna Chataway. 2014. Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. Social science & medicine 112 (2014), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu Youyou, Michal Kosinski, and David Stillwell. 2015. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 4 (2015), 1036–1040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Daokun Zhang, Jie Yin, Xingquan Zhu, and Chengqi Zhang. 2016. Homophily, structure, and content augmented network representation learning. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 609–618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Human Values and Attitudes towards Vaccination in Social Media
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference
            May 2019
            1331 pages
            ISBN:9781450366755
            DOI:10.1145/3308560

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 May 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format