ABSTRACT
As a broader effort to build a holistic biopsychosocial health metric, reaction time data obtained from participants undertaking neurocognitive tests; have been examined using Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) for assessing its distribution. Many of the known existing methods assume, that the reaction time data follows a Gaussian distribution and thus commonly use statistical measures such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for analysis. However, it is not mandatory for the reaction time data, to necessarily follow Gaussian distribution and in many instances, it can be better modeled by other representations such as Gamma distribution. Unlike Gaussian distribution which is defined using mean and variance, the Gamma distribution is defined using shape and scale parameters which also considers higher order moments of data such as skewness and kurtosis. Generalized Linear Models (GLM), based on the family exponential distributions such as Gamma distribution, which have been used to model reaction time in other domains, have not been fully explored for modeling reaction time data in psychology domain. While limited use of Gamma distribution have been reported [5, 17, 21], for analyzing response times, their application has been somewhat ad-hoc rather than systematic. For this proposed research, we use a real life biopsychosocial dataset, generated from the 'digital health' intervention programs conducted by the Faculty of Health, Federation University, Australia. The two digital intervention programs were the 'Mindfulness' program and 'Physical Activity' program. The neurocognitive tests were carried out as part of the 'Mindfulness' program. In this paper, we investigate the participants' reaction time distributions in neurocognitive tests such as the Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) Go/No-Go test [19], which is a subset of the larger biopsychosocial data set. PEBL is an open source software system for designing and running psychological experiments. Analysis of participants' reaction time in the PEBL Go/No-Go test, shows that the reaction time data are more compatible with a Gamma distribution and clearly demonstrate that these can be better modeled by Gamma distribution.
- R. H. Baayen and P. Milin. 2010. Analyzing Reaction Times. 3, 2 (2010), 12--28.Google Scholar
- D. A. Balota and D. H. Spieler. 1999. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. J Exp Psychol Gen 128, 1 (1999), 32--55. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10100390Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Bucsuhazy and M. Semela. 2017. Case Study: Reaction Time of Children According to Age. Transbaltica 2017: Transportation Science and Technology 187, Supplement C (2017), 408--413.Google Scholar
- S. L. Burbeck and Luce. 1982. Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors | SpringerLink. R.D. Perception and Psychophysics 32, 2 (1982), 117--133.Google Scholar
- Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin. 2009. A Theory of Reaction Time Distributions. (2009).Google Scholar
- C. V. Dolan, H. L. van der Maas, and P. C. Molenaar. 2002. A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34, 3 (2002), 304--23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12395546Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luce R. Duncan. 1989. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. PSYCHOMETRIKA 54, 3 (1989), 542--545.Google Scholar
- A. Heathcote, S. J. Popiel, and D. J. K. Mewhort. 1991. Analysis of Response-Time Distributions - an Example Using the Stroop Task. Psychological Bulletin 109, 2 (1991), 340--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. P. Henriquez-Henriquez, P. Billeke, H. Henriquez, F. J. Zamorano, F. Roth-hammer, and F. Aboitiz. 2014. Intra-Individual Response Variability Assessed by Ex-Gaussian Analysis may be a New Endophenotype for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Front Psychiatry 5 (2014), 197.Google Scholar
- R. H. Hohle. 1965. Inferred components of reaction times as functions of forepaid duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1965), 382--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. J. Husak, J. Michaelsen, and C. Funk. 2007. Use of the gamma distribution to represent monthly rainfall in Africa for drought monitoring applications. International Journal of Climatology 27, 7 (2007), 935--944.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Krishnamoorthy, M. Lee, and W. Xiao. 2015. Likelihood ratio tests for comparing several gamma distributions. Environmetrics 26, 8 (2015), 571--583.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yves Lacouture and Denis Cousineau. 2008. How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 4, 1 (2008), 35--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Lo and S. Andrews. 2015. To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Front Psychol 6 (2015), 1171.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanna Lu, Sandra Chan, and Linda Lam. 2016. Associations between Intra-Individual Variability of Reaction Time and Cognitive Function in Cognitively Normal Senior Adults: Still beyond Good or Bad? Geriatrics 1, 2 (2016), 13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gareth Marshall. 2007. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Meteorological Applications 14, 2 (2007), 205--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William J. McGill and John Gibbon. 1965. The general-gamma distribution and reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2, 1 (1965), 1--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marco Moniz, Saul Neves de Jesus, Eduardo GonÃğalves, JoÃčo Viseu, Andreia Pacheco, and Susana Moreira. 2016. Portuguese Version of Simple Go/No-Go Task: Influence of Age in Attention and Response Inhibition Reaction Time. Psychology 07, 02 (2016), 254--257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. T. Mueller. 2013. The Psychology Experiment Building Language (Version 0.13). (2013). http://pebl.sourceforge.netGoogle Scholar
- Osborne. 2002. Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 8, 6 (2002).Google Scholar
- E. M. Palmer, T. S. Horowitz, A. Torralba, and J. M. Wolfe. 2011. What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37, 1 (2011), 58--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vito Ricci. 2005. Fitting Distributions with R. (2005).Google Scholar
- Paul T. Schickedanz and Gary F. Krause. 1970. A Test for the Scale Parameters of Two Gamma Distributions using the Generalized Likelihood Ratio. Journal of Applied Meteorology 9, 1 (1970), 13--16. <0013:atftsp>2.0.co;2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saul Sternberg. {n. d.}. RTs and the Ex-Gaussian Distribution Page 1 Reaction Times and the Ex-Gaussian Distribution: When is it Appropriate? ({n. d.}).Google Scholar
- H. C. S. Thom. 1958. A Note on the Gamma Distribution. Monthly Weather Review 86, 4 (1958), 117--122. <0117:anotgd>2.0.co;2Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. C. S. Thom. 1958. A Note on the Gamma Distribution. Monthly Weather Review 86, 4 (1958), 117--122. <0117:anotgd>2.0.co;2Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Whelan. 2008. Effective analysis of reaction time data. Psychological Record 58, 3 (2008), 475--482. <GotoISI>://WOS:000258586300009Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Wilks. 1990. Maximum-Likelihood-Estimation for the Gamma-Distribution Using Data Containing Zeros. Journal of Climate 3, 12 (1990), 1495--1501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Trisha Van Zandt. 2002. Analysis of Response Time Distributions. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology (2002).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Modeling neurocognitive reaction time with gamma distribution
Recommendations
Exact distribution of the product of m gamma and n Pareto random variables
Exact expressions are derived for the probability density function (pdf), cumulative distribution function (cdf), shape of the pdf, asymptotics of the pdf and the cdf, Laplace transform, moment properties and the order statistics properties of the ...
Improved near-exact distributions for the product of independent Generalized Gamma random variables
The Generalized Gamma distribution is an important distribution in Statistics since it has as particular cases many well known and important distributions and also due to its very interesting modeling properties, which makes it an attractive tool. The ...
Computation of the Chi-Square and Poisson Distribution
The paper deals with the computation of upper and lower tail probabilities of the chi-square and Poisson distribution with a specified relative accuracy on both tails for virtually all possible parameter values. With some supplement the proposed ...
Comments