skip to main content
research-article

Icon design to improve communication of health information to older adults

Published:01 November 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper describes the studies undertaken in order to improve and simplify communication of health information for a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) devices, specifically the BL Healthcare Access Tablet, to older adults. Current icon and information design of the RPM devices are not well designed to reflect the needs, experiences and limitations of the older adults. In addition to this, compliance with self-management schedules is often poor due to complex and unclear instructions and information design. The issue of compliance, with the need for effective communication between chronic disease patients and healthcare professionals emphasize the need for the appropriate information design and communication technology. Communication of health information was improved from the perspective of the user experience (UX) design and information design. For the purpose of addressing the UX redesign, usability studies were conducted, followed by the information redesign and icons design. Although medical peripherals, such as an electronic thermometer, are required to measure the patient information, a mobile or tablet application can easily be used to record, send and view this data. A concept for the RPM mobile application is developed, that could be used on existing tablets and smartphones, thus eliminating the need for the current costly hardware.

References

  1. Albers, M. J., & Mazur, M. B. (2003). Content and complexity: information design in technical communication: Routledge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bernard, M., Liao, C. H., & Mills, M. (2001). The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. Paper presented at the CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bernard, M. L. (2003). Criteria for optimal web design (designing for usability). Retrieved on April, 13, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., & Tullis, T. (2003). Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. Paper presented at the ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chiang, L.-C., Chen, W.-C., Dai, Y.-T., & Ho, Y.-L. (2012). The effectiveness of telehealth care on caregiver burden, mastery of stress, and family function among family caregivers of heart failure patients: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(10), 1230--1242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chiang, L. C., Chen, W. C., Dai, Y. T., & Ho, Y. L. (2012). The effectiveness of telehealth care on caregiver burden, mastery of stress, and family function among family caregivers of heart failure patients: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Coyne, K. P., & Nielsen, J. (2002). Web Usability for Senior Citizens. Retrieved from Nielsen Norman Group Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Czejdo, B. D., & Baszun, M. (2010). Remote patient monitoring system and a medical social network. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing, 1(3), 273--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dourish, P. (1997). Accounting for system behaviour: Representation, reflection and resourceful action. Computers and Design in Context, (145--170). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eisenstein, J., Vanderdonckt, J., & Puerta, A. (2001). Applying model-based techniques to the development of UIs for mobile computers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches: CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Foley, D., Ancoli-Israel, S., Britz, P., & Walsh, J. (2004). Sleep disturbances and chronic disease in older adults: results of the 2003 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Survey. Journal of psychosomatic research, 56(5), 497--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fraser, H., Kwon, Y. J., & Neuer, M. (2011). The Future of Connected Health Devices. Retrieved from touchhealthsciences.com. 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Galitz, W. O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. Wiley: New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gargiulo, G., Bifulco, P., Cesarelli, M., Jin, C., McEwan, A., & van Schaik, A. (2010). Wearable dry sensors with Bluetooth connection for use in remote patient monitoring systems. Studies In Health Technology And Informatics, 161, 57--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jessica, M., & Matthews, J. (2004). Blind leading the blind: theorizing a web for the visually impaired. Usability Professionals' Association ProceedingsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kascak, L., Rébola, C. B., Braunstein, R., & Sanford, J. A. (2013). Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kimball, M. A. (2013). Visual design principles: An empirical study of design lore. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(1).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. (2008). Designing a familiar technology for elderly people. Gerontechnology, 7(2), 151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Malkary, G. (2006). Healthcare without bounds: Trends in remote patient monitoring. {Study - Customer Needs and Strategies}. Spyglass Consulting Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Marcus, A. (1986). Computer graphics today, tutorial 10: Proper color, type use improve instruction. Tutorial Notes for Visible Language Programming: User Interface Design, Information Graphics, and Documentation. Berkeley, CA: Aaron Marcus and Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A., & Caylor, E. C. (2001). The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user's perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrell, R. W. (2001). Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web: Psychology Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Morrell, R. W., Dailey, S. R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C. B., & Echt, K. V. (2003). Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and web site accessibility guidelines. National Institute of Health. Retrieved from http://www.nih.nia.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, J. (1994). How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nielsen, J., & Hackos, J. T. (1993). Usability engineering (Vol. 125184069). Academic press: Boston. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Norman, D. (2007). The Design of Future Things. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Redish, J., & Chisnell, D. (2004). Designing web sites for older adults: A review of recent research. Retrieved June, 9, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. (2008). The National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowan, M., Gregor, P., Sloan, D., & Booth, P. (2000). Evaluating web resources for disability access. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth international ACM Conference on Assistive technologies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sorg, J. A. (1985). An exploratory study of type face, type size and color paper preferences among older adults. Pennsylvania State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Suter, P., Suter, W. N., & Johnston, D. (2011). Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Population health management, 14(2), 87--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Thong, J. Y., Hong, W., & Tam, K. Y. What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries?. Communications of the ACM, 47(11), 78--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zajicek, M., & Morrissey, W. (2003). Multimodality and interactional differences in older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2(2), 125--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zaphiris, P., Kurniawan, S. H., & Ellis, R. D. (2003). Age related differences and the depth vs. breadth tradeoff in hierarchical online information systems Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience (pp. 23--42): Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Communication Design Quarterly
    Communication Design Quarterly  Volume 2, Issue 1
    November 2013
    67 pages
    EISSN:2166-1642
    DOI:10.1145/2559866
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 November 2013

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader