skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441936acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties

Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Among those who have recently lost a job, social networks in general and online ones in particular may be useful to cope with stress and find new employment. This study focuses on the psychological and practical consequences of Facebook use following job loss. By pairing longitudinal surveys of Facebook users with logs of their online behavior, we examine how communication with different kinds of ties predicts improvements in stress, social support, bridging social capital, and whether they find new jobs. Losing a job is associated with increases in stress, while talking with strong ties is generally associated with improvements in stress and social support. Weak ties do not provide these benefits. Bridging social capital comes from both strong and weak ties. Surprisingly, individuals who have lost a job feel greater stress after talking with strong ties. Contrary to the "strength of weak ties" hypothesis, communication with strong ties is more predictive of finding employment within three months.

References

  1. Aral, S. and Van Alstyne, M. The Diversity-Bandwidth Trade-off. American Journal of Sociology 117, 1 (2011), 90--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Backstrom, L., Bakshy, E., Kleinberg, J., Lento, T.M., and Rosenn, I. Center of attention: How facebook users allocate attention across friends. Proc. 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (2011), 1--8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessière, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., and Boneva, B. Effects of internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication & Society 11, 1 (2008), 47--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bian, Y. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, (1997), 366--385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., and Kessler, R.C. Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, 6 (2000), 953Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. Readings in economic sociology, (1986), 280--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S.L., Nesse, R.M., Vinokur, A.D., and Smith, D.M. Providing Social Support May Be More Beneficial Than Receiving It Results From a Prospective Study of Mortality. Psychological Science 14, 4 (2003), 320--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment Situation Summary. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, M. Reading, Writing, Relationships: The Impact of Social Network Sites on Relations and Well-Being. 2011. http://reportsarchive adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/hcii/Carnegie Mellon University-HCII-11-107.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke, M., Kraut, R.E., and Marlow, C. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proceedings of the 29th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '11), (2011), 571--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '10), (2010), 1909--1912 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Burt, R.S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard Univ Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. and Wills, T.A. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 98, 2 (1985), 310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, (1983), 385--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., and Hoberman, H.M. Measuring the functional components of social support. In I.G. Sarason and B.R. Sarason, eds., Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications, 1985, 73--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, )1988), 95--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., Lampe, C. & Brooks, B. (2011). "Cultivating Social Resources on Facebook: Signals of Relational Investment and their Role in Social Capital Processes." Paper presented at the iCS-OII 2011 "A Decade in Internet Time" Symposium. Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook 'friends' Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12,(2007), 1143--1168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Eurostat. Employment and Unemployment. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Facebook. Registration Statement. United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '09), (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gore, S. The effect of social support in moderating the health consequences of unemployment. Journal of health and social behavior, (1978), 157--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Granovetter, M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hampton, K., Goulet, L.S., Rainie, L., and Purcell, K. Social networking sites and our lives. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampton, K.N., Sessions, L.F., Her, E.J., and Rainie, L. Social isolation and new technology: How the Internet and mobile phones impact Americans' social networks. Pew Internet & Internet Life Project, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Haythornthwaite, C. Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society 8, 2 (2005), 125--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hiller, H.H. and Franz, T.M. New ties, old ties and lost ties: the use of the internet in diaspora. New Media & Society 6, 6 (2004), 731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Holmes, T. and Rahe, R. The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of psychosomatic research, (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. House, J. and Landis, K. Social relationships and health. Science, (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. House, J.S., Kahn, R.L., McLeod, J.D., and Williams, D. Measures and concepts of social support. (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jahoda, M. Unemployed men at work. Unemployed people: Social and psychological perspectives,(1938).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, A.H., Monin, B., Dweck, C.S., Lovett, B.J., John, O.P., and Gross, J.J. Misery Has More Company Than People Think: Underestimating the Prevalence of Others' Negative Emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 1(2011), 120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Keele, L. and Kelly, N.J. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis 14, 2 (2006), 186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kluth, A. Primates on Facebook. The Economist, 2009. http://www.economist.com/node/13176775?story_id=13176775.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehman, D.R., Ellard, J.H., and Wortman, C.B. Social support for the bereaved: Recipients' and and informal job matching. Socio-Economic Review 8, 2 (2010), 307providers' perspectives on what is helpful. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54, 4 (1986), 438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin, N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge Univ Pr, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Madden, M. and Zickuhr, K. 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Marin, A. and Hampton, K.N. Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator. Field Methods 19, 2 (2007), 163--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Marsden, P.V. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, (1987),122--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. McDonald, S. Right place, right time: serendipity and informal job matching. Socio-Economic Review 8, 2 (2010), 307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Naaman, M., Boase, J., and Lai, C.H. Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (2010), 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Owen, J.E., Klapow, J.C., Roth, D.L., and Tucker, D.C. Use of the internet for information and support: Disclosure among persons with breast and prostate cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 27, 5 (2004), 491--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Pennebaker, J.W. and Chung, C.K. Expressive writing, emotional upheavals, and health. Handbook of health psychology, (2007), 263--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam, R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Thoits, P.A. Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of health and social behavior, (1995), 53--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Valkenburg, P.M. and Peter, J. Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 43, 2 (2007), 267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Wanberg, C.R. Unemployment and Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology 63, 1 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 3 (1990), 558--588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Williams, D. On and off the 'net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 2 (2006), 593--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Wortman, C.B. and Lehman, D.R. Reactions to victims of life crises: Support attempts that fail. Social support: Theory, research and applications, (1985), 463--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. presented at the iCS-OII 2011 "A Decade in Internet Time" Symposium. Oxford, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader