COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL, 3D AND 1D MODEL FOR A MIXED-FLOW TURBINE UNDER PULSATING FLOW CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Meng Soon Chiong UTM Centre for Low Carbon Transport in Cooperation with Imperial College London, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Hasbullah Padzillah UTM Centre for Low Carbon Transport in Cooperation with Imperial College London, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Srithar Rajoo UTM Centre for Low Carbon Transport in Cooperation with Imperial College London, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Alessandro Romagnoli School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, N3.2-02-32, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore
  • Aaron W. Costall Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • Ricardo F. Martinez-Botas Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6155

Keywords:

1D, 3D, experiment, pulse flow, mixed-flow turbine

Abstract

The pulse flow performance of a turbocharger turbine is known to be different than its corresponding steady flow performance. This often leads to less-than-satisfactory 1D engine model prediction. In this study, the effectiveness of a 1D pulse flow turbine model is assessed against experimental data with the aid of 3D CFD model. The turbine under study is a single-entry variable geometry mixed-flow turbine. The result shows highly comparable pulse flow swallowing capacity and actual power characteristics between 1D and 3D models. The over-prediction in 1D actual power magnitude is found to be due to the simplification of combining nozzle and rotor stage pressure loss together.

References

Hogg, R. 2014. Life Beyond Euro VI. URL http://www.automotiveworld.com/megatrends-articles/life-beyond-euro-vi/ last accessed 13.07.15.

US Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Carbon Pollution Standards. URL http:// www2. epa. gov/ sites/ production/ files/ 2014-05/ ghg-chart.png last accessed 13.07.15.

Jaffe, E. 2015. Where Electric Vehicles Actually Cause More Pollution than GasCcars. URL http:// www. citylab. com/ weather/ 2015/ 06/ where- electric- vehicles- actually- cause- more- pollution- than-gas-cars/397136/ last accessed 13.07.15.

Markus, F. 2015. Mousetrap Betterment: Keeping Combustion Contemporary — Technologue. URL http:// blogs. motortrend. com/ 1506_ mousetrap_ betterment_ keeping_ combustion_ contemporary_ technologue. html last accessed 13.07.15.

KPMG International 2010. The Transformation of the Automotive Industry: The Environmental Regulation Effect. Executive Summary.

Jinnai, Y., Arimizu, H., Tashiro, N., Tojo, M., Yokoyama, T. and Hayashi, N. 2012. A Variable Geometry (GV) Turbocharger for Passenger Cars to Meet European Union Emission Regulations. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review. 49(2): 17–26.

Matsumoto, K., Jinnai, Y. and Suzuki, H. 1998. Development of Variable Geometry Turbocharger for Diesel Passenger Car. Proceedings of IMechE 6th International Conference on Turbocharging and Air Management Systems. Paper C554/005.

Hawley, J. G., Cox, A., Pease, A. C., Bird, G. L. and Horrocks, R. W. 1998. Use of a VGT to Improve the Limiting Torque Characteristics of a D1 Automotive Diesel Engine. Proceedings of IMechE 6th International Conference on Turbocharging and Air Management Systems. Paper C554/014.

Zhao, R., Zhuge, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Martinez-Botas, R. F. and Yin, Y. 2015. Study of Two-Stage Turbine Characteristic and Its Influence on Turbo-Compound Engine Performance. Energy Conversion and Management. 95: 414-423.

Osako, K., Samata, A., Ibaraki, S., Jinnai, Y., Suzuki, H. and Hayashi, N. 2006. Development of the High-Performance and High-Reliability VG Turbocharger for Automotive Applications. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review. 43(3): 1–5.

Tomohiro, I., Yuuji, K., Yoshimitsu, M. and Yasutaka, S. 2011. Development of VGS unit (STEP4) for RHV4 Turbocharger. IHI Engineering Review. 44(2): 1–6.

Dale, A. and Watson, N. 1986. Vaneless Radial Turbocharger Turbine Performance. Proceedings of the IMechE 3rd International Conference on Turbocharging and Turbochargers. Paper C110/86.

Szymko, S., Martinez-Botas, R. F. and Pullen, K. R. 2005. Experimental Evaluation of Turbocharger Turbine Performance under Pulsating Flow Conditions. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air. Paper GT2005-68878.

Chiong, M. S., Rajoo, S., Romagnoli, A., Costall, A. W., and Martinez-Botas, R. F. 2015. Non-Adiabatic Pressure Loss Boundary Condition for Modeling Turbocharger Turbine Pulsating Flow. Energy Conversion and Management. 93:267–281.

Rajoo, S. 2007. Steady and Pulsating Performance of a Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine. Ph.D. Thesis. Imperial College, University of London.

Rajoo, S. and Martinez-Botas, R. F. 2008. Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbine for Turbochargers: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems. 1: 155-168.

Szymko, S., McGlashan, N. R., Martinez-Botas, R. F. and Pullen, K. R. 2007. The Development of Dynamometer for Torque Measurement of Automotive Turbocharger Turbines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 221(2): 225–239.

Costall, A. W. 2007. A One-Dimensional Study of Unsteady Wave Propagation in Turbocharger Turbines. Ph.D. Thesis. Imperial College, University of London.

Hideaki, T., Masaru, U., Akira, I. and Shinnosuke, I. 2007. Study on Flow Field in Variable Area Nozzle for Radial Turbines. IHI Engineering Review. 40(2): 89–97.

Chen, H. 1990. Steady and Unsteady Performance of Vaneless Casing Radial-Inflow Turbines. Ph.D. Thesis. UMIST, University of Manchester.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-08

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL, 3D AND 1D MODEL FOR A MIXED-FLOW TURBINE UNDER PULSATING FLOW CONDITIONS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6155