To read this content please select one of the options below:

Applying classification controls to Internet content in Australia

Shona Leitch (College of Business, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia)
Matthew Warren (Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia)

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

ISSN: 1477-996X

Article publication date: 11 May 2015

714

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore Australian public and stakeholders views towards the regulation of the Internet and its content. The federal government called for submissions addressing their proposal, and this paper analyses these submissions for themes and provides clarity as to the Australian public and stakeholders key concerns in regards to the proposed policy.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper uses a qualitative approach to analyse the public consultations to the Australian Federal Government. These documents are coded and analysed to determine negative and positive viewpoints.

Findings

The research has shown, based upon the analysis of the consultation, that there was no public support for any of the measures put forward, that the Australian Federal Government in its response has not recognised this public feedback and instead has only utilised some of the qualitative feedback obtained through the public consultation process to try to justify its case to proceed with its proposals.

Research limitations/implications

The study is focussed on Australia.

Practical implications

The paper analyses a proposed national approach to filtering the content of the Internet and discussed the public reaction to such an approach.

Social implications

The paper looks at how different parts of Australian society view Internet filtering in a positive or negative manner.

Originality/value

The only study that directly looks at the viewpoint of the Australian public.

Keywords

Citation

Leitch, S. and Warren, M. (2015), "Applying classification controls to Internet content in Australia", Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2014-0037

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles