Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managing dynamic security networks: Towards the strategic managing of cooperation, coordination and collaboration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Security networks are increasing in number and in importance across the security field as a means of providing inter-agency coordination. On the basis of a detailed qualitative study of networks in the field of national security in Australia, this article aims to advance our knowledge of the internal properties of security networks and conditions shaping their performance. It places ‘cooperation’, ‘coordination’ and ‘collaboration’ on a continuum, with cooperation at one end and collaboration at the other end, and aims to illustrate how each of these ‘Cs’ shape the performance of security networks. The central argument is that the performance of security networks increases as the network moves from cooperation to collaboration. Drawing on interviews with senior members of security, law enforcement and intelligence agencies, the article aims to highlight the lessons for how to strategically manage security networks in ways that promote collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2006) Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review 66(1): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. (2001) The advent of netwar (revisited). In: J. Arquilla and D. Ronfeldt (eds.) Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2011) Independent Review of the Intelligence Community. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Borgatti, S. and Foster, P. (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management 29(6): 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. and Tsai, W. (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47(6): 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, J.-P. (2007) High and low policing in post-9/11 times. Policing 1(1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, J.-P. and Dupont, B. (2008) Introductory essay: The role of knowledge and networks in policing. In: T. Williamson (ed.) The Handbook of Knowledge-Based Policing: Current Conceptions and Future Directions. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 9–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Waever, O. and Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J. and Fussey, P. (2010) Olympic security. In: J. Gold and M. Gold (eds.) Olympic Cities: City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1986–2012, 2nd edn Hoboken, NJ: Routledge, pp. 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. and Parker, A. (2004) The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding how Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn, H. (2006) One fight, one team: The 9/11 Commission report on intelligence, fragmentation and information. Public Administration 84(2): 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K. (2009) Information and knowledge management in public sector networks: The case of the US intelligence community. International Journal of Public Administration 32(14): 1219–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, B. (2004) Security in the age of networks. Policing & Society 14(1): 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, B. (2006) Delivering security through networks: Surveying the relational landscape of security managers in an urban setting. Crime, Law and Social Change 45(2): 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M. (ed.) (1997) Explaining inter-organizational network formation. In: The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussey, P. and Coaffee, J. (2012) Balancing local and global security leitmotifs: Counter-terrorism and the spectacle of sporting mega-events. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 47(3): 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. (2006) Not just joining the dots but crossing the borders and bridging the voids: Constructing security networks after 11 September 2001. Policing & Society 16(1): 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2007) Intelligence reform: The logic of information sharing. Intelligence and National Security 22(3): 384–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Brown, K. and Mandell, M. (2007) Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal 10(1): 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. and Provan, K. (2006) The control of public networks. International Public Management Journal 9(3): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. and Provan, K. (2009) Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration 87(3): 440–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. and Krackhardt, D. (2008) Interpersonal Networks in Organizations: Cognition Personality, Dynamics, and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. and Tsai, K. (2003) Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Jarvenpaa, S. and Majchrzak, A. (2008) Ad Hoc interorganizational collaboration: Safeguards for balancing sharing and protection of knowledge. In: I. Becerra-Fernandez and D. Leidner (eds.) Knowledge Management: An Evolutionary View. Armonk, NY: Advances in Management Information Systems, pp. 292–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 31(3): 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, C. (2006) Calling a truce in the culture wars: From Enron to the CIA. Stanford Law & Policy Review 17(2): 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. (2006) Two case studies of American anti-terrorism. In: J. Wood and B. Dupont (eds.) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. (2007) A dialectic of organisational and occupational culture. In: M. O’Neill, M. Marks and A. Singh (eds.) Police Occupational Culture: New Debates and Directions. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. (2004) The 9/11 Commission Report. Washington DC: US Government.

  • O’Leary, R. and Vij, N. (2012) Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration 24(5): 507–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. (1997) Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57(1): 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. and Whelan, C. (2006) Counter-terrorism across the policing continuum. Police Practice and Research 7(5): 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. and Powell, W. (2006) Networks and organizations. In: S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence and W. Nord (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn London: Sage Publications, pp. 776–799.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In: B. Staw and L. Cummings (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. and Kenis, P. (2008) Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. and Milward, H. (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61(4): 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K., Fish, A. and Sydow, J. (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 33(3): 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R. and Camerer, C. (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 22(3): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. and Sowa, J. (2004) Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treverton, G. (2003) Terrorism, intelligence and law enforcement: Learning the right lessons. Intelligence and National Security 18(4): 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C. (2011) Network dynamics and network effectiveness: A methodological framework of public sector networks in the field of national security. Australian Journal of Public Administration 70(3): 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C. (2012) Networks and National Security: Dynamics, Effectiveness and Organisation. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, A., Lee, S.-Y., Yun, T. and Jung, C. (2010) Collaborative behavior and the performance of government agencies. International Public Management Journal 13(4): 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science 9(2): 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2009) Security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegart, A. (2007) Spying Blind: The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Education, Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, Geelong, 3220, VIC, Australia

    Chad Whelan

Authors
  1. Chad Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whelan, C. Managing dynamic security networks: Towards the strategic managing of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Secur J 30, 310–327 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.20

Keywords

Search

Navigation