Synlett 2016; 27(16): 2372-2377
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1561498
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Oxidative Cleavage of Silyl Ethers by an Oxoammonium Salt

Jacob J. Loman ‡
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA   Email: nicholas.leadbeater@uconn.edu
,
Vincent A. Pistritto ‡
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA   Email: nicholas.leadbeater@uconn.edu
,
Christopher B. Kelly
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA   Email: nicholas.leadbeater@uconn.edu
,
Nicholas E. Leadbeater*
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA   Email: nicholas.leadbeater@uconn.edu
b   Department of Community Medicine & Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, The Exchange, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 April 2016

Accepted after revision: 12 June 2016

Publication Date:
14 July 2016 (online)


These authors contributed equally

Abstract

A method for the oxidative cleavage of silyl ethers to their corresponding carbonyl species mediated by an oxoammonium salt is described. The resulting aldehydes and ketones are obtained under mild reaction conditions with no observed overoxidation. For robust substrates, heating to reflux temperatures significantly reduces the reaction time.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes


    • Silyl protecting groups:
    • 1a Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 3rd ed. Wiley; New York: 1999
    • 1b Corey EJ, Venkateswarlu A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 6190
  • 2 Nelson TD, Crouch RD. Synthesis 1996; 9: 1031
  • 3 DiLauro AM, Seo W, Phillips ST. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 7352
  • 4 Wang B, Sun H, Sun Z. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 1781
  • 5 Muzart J. Synthesis 1993; 11

    • Alternative oxidative deprotection strategies:
    • 6a Firouzabadi H, Iranpoor N, Zolfigol MA. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998; 71: 2169
    • 6b Karimi B, Rajabi J. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 2841
  • 7 Barnych B, Vatèle JM. Synlett 2011; 2048
  • 8 Kelly CB, Lambert KM, Mercadante MA, Ovian JM, Bailey WF, Leadbeater NE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 4241
  • 9 Mercadante MA, Kelly CB, Bobbitt JM, Tilley LJ, Leadbeater NE. Nat. Protoc. 2013; 8: 666
  • 10 Richter H, García-Mancheño O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 4460
  • 11 Pradhan PP, Bobbitt JM, Bailey WF. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 9524
    • 12a Hamlin TA, Kelly CB, Leadbeater NE. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 3658
    • 12b Kelly CB, Mercadante MA, Wiles RJ, Leadbeater NE. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2222
    • 12c Bobbitt JM, Bartelson AL, Bailey WF, Hamlin TA, Kelly CB. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 1055
    • 12d Leadbeater NE, Bobbitt JM. Aldrichimica Acta 2014; 47: 65
  • 13 Kelly CB, Ovian JM, Cywar RM, Gossland TR, Wiles RJ, Leadbeater NE. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 4255
  • 14 Representative Procedure To a 100 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a stir bar was added the silyl ether 2c (1.95 g, 7.0 mmol, 1 equiv) and the oxoammonium salt 1 (2.10 g, 7.0 mmol, 1 equiv), followed by MeCN (35 mL, 0.2 M in the silyl ether). The solution was heated to 40 °C while stirring for 72 h. After this time, the crude mixture was diluted with Et2O (200 mL) and deionized water (200 mL). The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with deionized water (ca. 100 mL), brine (ca. 100 mL), and dried with Na2SO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo by rotary evaporation, and the resulting crude mixture was adhered to silica gel using 1.5 wt equiv of SiO2 (relative to the theoretical yield). The dry-packed material was gently added atop a silica gel plug. The plug was washed with an excess of hexanes (ca. 5 column volumes). The desired product was eluted off the plug via a 95:5 by volume mixture of hexanes–EtOAc (3–4 column volumes). The solvent was removed in vacuo by rotary evaporation affording the pure aldehyde 3c (0.67 g, 59%) as a clear yellow liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.98 (s, 1 H), 7.88–7.77 (m, 2 H), 7.61–7.48 (m, 2 H), 1.36 (s, 9 H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.05 (CH), 158.53 (C), 134.30 (C), 129.84 (CH), 126.13 (CH), 35.49 (C), 31.23 (CH3) ppm.