Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Not all patients who have a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elect to have surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the short-to-medium-term results of patients who chose conservative management in comparison to patients who had reconstructive surgery within the same time period. Sixty-three patients with an ACL injury were retrospectively studied. Forty patients were managed, according to patient choice, with ACL reconstruction and 23 conservatively. Four validated questionnaires were used to assess general and knee-specific function in a cohort with a median age of 32 years and a median follow-up period of 38 months. Patients were matched on demographic variables except for gender. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures, and the majority of patients would proceed with the same treatment in the event the control leg became injured. Patients who elect to have conservative management of an ACL rupture can achieve similar function and satisfaction to those who elect to have reconstruction. Until a large randomized controlled trial is conducted, patients need to be made aware of the merits of both management strategies and the lack of evidence of superiority of one over the other.

Note

This study was conducted at the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.

• References

• 1 Bollen SR, Scott BW. Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament—a quiet epidemic?. Injury 1996; 27 (6) 407-409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H. Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (4) 607-613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Hertel P, Behrend H, Cierpinski T, Musahl V, Widjaja G. ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone press-fit fixation: 10-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (4) 248-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Asano H, Muneta T, Ikeda H, Yagishita K, Kurihara Y, Sekiya I. Arthroscopic evaluation of the articular cartilage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a short-term prospective study of 105 patients. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (5) 474-481
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Fink C, Hoser C, Hackl W, Navarro RA, Benedetto KP. Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture—is sports activity a determining variable?. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22 (4) 304-309
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kessler MA, Behrend H, Henz S, Stutz G, Rukavina A, Kuster MS. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (5) 442-448
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sandberg R, Balkfors B, Nilsson B, Westlin N. Operative versus non-operative treatment of recent injuries to the ligaments of the knee. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (8) 1120-1126
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Andersson C, Odensten M, Gillquist J. Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (264) 255-263
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (4) 331-342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Linko E, Harilainen A, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S. Surgical versus conservative interventions for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2 (2) CD001356
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Mohtadi N. Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26 (3) 350-359
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10 (3) 150-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34 (3) 220-233
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 George MS, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. Endoscopic versus rear-entry ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455 (455) 158-161
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (7) 762-770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Buss DD, Min R, Skyhar M, Galinat B, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Nonoperative treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a selected group of patients. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (2) 160-165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar