Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Liquid application method for time-resolved analyses by serial synchrotron crystallography

Abstract

We introduce a liquid application method for time-resolved analyses (LAMA), an in situ mixing approach for serial crystallography. Picoliter-sized droplets are shot onto chip-mounted protein crystals, achieving near-full ligand occupancy within theoretical diffusion times. We demonstrate proof-of-principle binding of GlcNac to lysozyme, and resolve glucose binding and subsequent ring opening in a time-resolved study of xylose isomerase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: In situ mixing enables efficient ligand soaking in serial synchrotron crystallography.
Fig. 2: LAMA enables the time-resolved analysis of the catalytic activity of XI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

PDB accession codes are: 6RNB, 6RNC, 6QNB, 6QNH, 6RND, 6RNF, 6QNC, 6QNI, 6QNJand 6QND. They are also listed in Supplementary Tables 1,2. The life sciences reporting summary, can be found in the online version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Moffat, K. Annu Rev. Biophys. Chem. 18, 309–332 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levantino, M., Yorke, B. A., Monteiro, D. C., Cammarata, M. & Pearson, A. R. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 35, 41–48 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gati, C. et al. IUCrJ 1, 87–94 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamamoto, M. et al. IUCrJ 4, 529–539 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oghbaey, S. et al. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 72, 944–955 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Owen, R. L. et al. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 73, 373–378 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulz, E. C. et al. Nat. Methods 15, 901–904 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coquelle, N. et al. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 71, 1184–1196 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bar-Even, A. et al. Biochemistry 50, 4402–4410 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman, H. N. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 35–58 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stagno, J. R. et al. Nature 541, 242–246 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beyerlein, K. R. et al. IUCrJ 4, 769–777 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt, M. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2013, 167276 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makinen, M. W. & Fink, A. L. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 6, 301–343 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olmos, J. L. et al. BMC Biol. 16, 1–15 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Russi, S. et al. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 24, 73–82 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer, M., Shoichet, B. K. & Fraser, J. S. ChemBioChem 16, 1560–1564 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keedy, D. A. et al. Structure 22, 899–910 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hochster, R. M. & Watson, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 3284–3285 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogue Angeletti, R. A. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 7814–7818 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chauthaiwale, J. & Rao, M. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 4495–4499 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cha, J. & Batt, C. A. Mol. Cells 8, 374–382 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Toteva, M. M., Silvaggi, N. R., Allen, K. N. & Richard, J. P. Biochemistry 50, 10170–10181 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chanitnun, K. & Pinphanichakarn, P. Braz. J. Microbiol. 43, 1084–1093 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dauter, Z., Dauter, M., Hemker, J., Witzel, H. & Wilson, K. S. FEBS Lett. 247, 1–8 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhosale, S. H., Rao, M. B. & Deshpande, V. V. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 280–300 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavie, A., Allen, K. N., Petsko, G. A. & Ringe, D. Biochemistry 33, 5469–5480 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kovalevsky, A. Y. et al. Structure 18, 688–699 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, R. W. & Zilm, K. W. J. Magn. Reson. 165, 162–174 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 70, 2204–2216 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. White, T. A. et al. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 335–341 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McCoy, A. J. et al. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adams, P. D. et al. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 53–55 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liebschner, D. et al. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 73, 148–157 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lang, P. T., Holton, J. M., Fraser, J. S. & Alber, T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 237–242 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, v.1.8. (Schrödinger LLC, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank D. Oberthuer (CFEL, DESY Hamburg) for the provision of the GlcNAc3 substrate immediately before data collection. The LAMA TR-SSX data were collected at beamline P14 and P14-2 (T-REXX) operated by EMBL Hamburg at the PETRA III storage ring (DESY, Hamburg, Germany). Construction of T-REXX was funded by the BMBF (Verbund Forschungsprojekt 05K16GU1). The authors are grateful to R. Dousza, L. Bultema and J. Besaw for their technical assistance during data collection. T-REXX beamtime was awarded as part of the EMBL BAG MX-660. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Max Planck Society and the excellence cluster ‘The Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging—Structure, Dynamics and Control of Matter at the Atomic Scale’ of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 1074 project ID 194651731 (R.J.D.M.). P.M. was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung for postdoctoral researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.M. and E.C.S. designed the experiment. E.C. S. and P. M. performed the experiments with support from F.T., H.S, J.P.L., S.H, D.v.S., G.B. and M.A. P.M. prepared the protein crystals. F.T. and P.M designed the integration of the droplet injector with support from E.C.S. J.P.L. designed and built the humidity nozzle. E.C.S. and P.M. processed and analyzed the diffraction data. S.H., M.A., G.B., D.v.S., A.R.P. and T.R.S. designed and built the T-REXX endstation to enable these experiments. R.J.D.M, P.M. and E.C.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and corrected the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Dwayne Miller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Allison Doerr was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 The LAMA setup.

a) Overview CAD render of the LAMA setup. The humidifier is connected to the translation stage with a hose represented in orange. The diffractometer, chip holder and translation stages were previously described in detail1. b) Closeup view of a) displays the injector nozzle (beige) mounted at a fixed point above the chip (black). The landing point of the droplets intersects with the X-ray beam at the position of each individual protein microcrystal inside the chip features as the chip is rastered across the X-ray beam. The humidified air nozzle is 3D-printed to provide a homogenous humidity stream over chip, preventing crystal dehydration. c) A ~150 pl droplet generated by a single pulse waveform of the piezo transducer (microdrop Technologies). d) A ~75 pl droplet generated by a triple pulse waveform of the piezo transducer (microdrop Technologies).

Supplementary Figure 2 Absolute value electron density maps for the different Lysozyme and Xylose isomerase time-points.

(ac) GlcNac3 is shown in a ball-and-stick representation. Absolute-value maps contoured at 0.5 e Å−3 from 0.05 s—1 s display a gradual increase of the electron density as a function of time. (di) Coloring and representation as in Fig. 2. All absolute value electron density maps are shown with the density contoured at 0.7 e Å−3.

Supplementary Figure 3 Detector/Stages/Droplet generator pulse sequence.

The plot shows the on/off times of the various components of the LAMA setup. Initially the stage moves into position and there is a pre-exposure time of 1 ms during which the detector is triggered, and a t0 image is taken. Subsequently a TTL pulse is sent to the droplet generator; the droplet has a time-of-flight of ~0.5 ms which is encompassed in the post-exposure time (4 ms). After droplet injection additional images are recorded at different feature positions. Finally, the sequence is repeated without any further droplet injection. The total time delay corresponds to a HARE number1.

Supplementary Figure 4 XI structure comparison.

a) The XI active site of the 0 s structure is clearly empty and shows only strong density for the metal binding sites. Metals were modelled as cobalt (green sphere) and magnesium (pink sphere) since these matched the 2Fo-Fc electron density best. The POLDER-OMIT map for the metals is shown at 3σ. b) Superimposition of XI with a previously determined neutron structure of XI in complex with glucose in closed ring conformation (cyan, 3KCL). c) Superimposition of XI with a previously determined neutron structure of XI in complex with glucose in open ring conformation (cyan, 3KBN).

Supplementary Figure 5 Superposition of XI structures over time.

a) Cartoon representation of the 7 XI-monomer structures superimposed with an overall r.m.s.d of 0.09 Å2. indicating that differences between all the XI structures are within error. b) The active site of all the superimposed XI structures showing that the side chains as well as the structural waters within a 7 Å radius around the ligand also show near identical conformations from one time point to the next.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Note, Supplementary Tables 1–3

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehrabi, P., Schulz, E.C., Agthe, M. et al. Liquid application method for time-resolved analyses by serial synchrotron crystallography. Nat Methods 16, 979–982 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0553-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0553-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing