Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Hydrological effects of forest transpiration loss in bark beetle-impacted watersheds

Subjects

Abstract

The recent climate-exacerbated mountain pine beetle infestation in the Rocky Mountains of North America has resulted in tree death that is unprecedented in recorded history. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity inherent in insect infestation creates a complex and often unpredictable watershed response, influencing the primary storage and flow components of the hydrologic cycle. Despite the increased vulnerability of forested ecosystems under changing climate1, watershed-scale implications of interception, ground evaporation, and transpiration changes remain relatively unknown, with conflicting reports of streamflow perturbations across regions. Here, contributions to streamflow are analysed through time and space to investigate the potential for increased groundwater inputs resulting from hydrologic change after infestation. Results demonstrate that fractional late-summer groundwater contributions from impacted watersheds are 30 ± 15% greater after infestation and when compared with a neighbouring watershed that experienced earlier and less-severe attack, albeit uncertainty propagations through time and space are considerable. Water budget analysis confirms that transpiration loss resulting from beetle kill can account for the relative increase in groundwater contributions to streams, often considered the sustainable flow fraction and critical to mountain water supplies and ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Conceptual model of water cycle changes with tree death induced by mountain pine beetles.
Figure 2: Map of Rocky Mountain National Park and sampling sites in the Big Thompson and North Inlet watersheds.
Figure 3: Fractional contributions of endmembers to streamflow.
Figure 4: Hydrograph separations presented as partitioning of the total daily stream discharge (in mm; full bar height) for the 1994 (blue) and 2012 (orange) seasons.
Figure 5: Watershed evapotranspiration changes from increased groundwater contributions in a simplified water budget.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderegg, W. R. L., Kane, J. M. & Anderegg, L. D. L. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nature Clim. Change 3, 30–36 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Colorado State Forest Service, 2012 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests (CSFS, (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hubbard, R. M., Rhoades, C. C., Elder, K. & Negron, J. Changes in transpiration and foliage growth in lodgepole pine trees following mountain pine beetle attack and mechanical girdling. For. Ecol. Manage. 289, 312–317 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wulder, M. A., Dymond, C. C., White, J. C., Leckie, D. G. & Carroll, A. L. Surveying mountain pine beetle damage of forests: A review of remote sensing opportunities. For. Ecol. Manage. 221, 27–41 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biederman, J. A. et al. Multiscale observations of snow accumulation and peak snowpack following widespread, insect-induced lodgepole pine mortality. Ecohydrology 7, 150–162 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikkelson, K. M. et al. Bark beetle infestation impacts on nutrient cycling, water quality and interdependent hydrological effects. Biogeochemistry 115, 1–21 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clow, D. W., Rhoades, C., Briggs, J., Caldwell, M. & Lewis Jr, W. M. Responses of soil and water chemistry to mountain pine beetle induced tree mortality in Grand County, Colorado, USA. Appl. Geochem. 26, S174–S178 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, M. G. et al. Evapotranspiration and canopy characteristics of two lodgepole pine stands following mountain pine beetle attack. Hydrol. Process. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9870 (2013).

  9. Maness, H., Kushner, P. J. & Fung, I. Summertime climate response to mountain pine beetle disturbance in British Columbia. Nature Geosci. 6, 65–70 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pypker, T. G. et al. Can carbon isotopes be used to predict watershed-scale transpiration? Wat. Resour. Res. 45, W00D35 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stednick, J. D. Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. J. Hydrol. 176, 79–95 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sueker, J. K., Ryan, J. N., Kendall, C. & Jarrett, R. D. Determination of hydrologic pathways during snowmelt for alpine/subalpine basins, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Wat. Resour. Res. 36, 63–75 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clow, D. W. et al. Ground water occurrence and contributions to streamflow in an alpine catchment, Colorado Front Range. Ground Wat. 41, 937–950 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mikkelson, K. M., Dickenson, E. R. V., Maxwell, R. M., McCray, J. E. & Sharp, J. O. Water-quality impacts from climate-induced forest die-off. Nature Clim. Change 3, 218–222 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooper, R. P. Diagnostic tools for mixing models of stream water chemistry. Wat. Resour. Res 39, 1055–1067 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tetzlaff, D., Malcolm, I. A. & Soulsby, C. Influence of forestry, environmental change and climatic variability on the hydrology, hydrochemistry and residence times of upland catchments. J. Hydrol. 346, 93–111 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung, H., Hogue, T. & Rademacher, L. Impact of wildfire on source water contributions in Devil Creek, CA: Evidence from end-member mixing analysis. Hydrol. Process. 23, 183–200 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams, H. D. et al. Ecohydrological consequences of drought- and infestation-triggered tree die-off: insights and hypotheses. Ecohydrology 5, 145–159 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pugh, E. & Gordon, E. A conceptual model of water yield effects from beetle-induced tree death in snow-dominated lodgepole pine forests. Hydrol. Process. 27, 2048–2060 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beudert, B., Klöcking, B. & Schwarze, R. Grosse Ohe: Impact of bark beetle infestation on the water and matter budget of a forested catchment. For. Hydrol. Res. Ger. Russ. 41–63 (2007).

  21. Braddock, W. & Cole, J. Geologic Map of Rocky Mountain National Park and Vicinity, Colorado (US Geol. Surv. Map I-1973, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rocky Mountain National Park Vegetation Project Field Plot Locations (US Natl Park Serv., 2006).

  23. National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Centre, Snow Data Assim. Syst. (SNODAS) Data Prod. NSIDC, [April 1, 2012] (National Snow and Ice Data Center, (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hubbard, R. M., Bond, B. J. & Ryan, M. G. Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiol. 19, 165–172 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins, B. J., Rhoades, C. C., Hubbard, R. M. & Battaglia, M. A. Tree regeneration and future stand development after bark beetle infestation and harvesting in Colorado lodgepole pine stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 261, 2168–2175 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rhoades, C. C. et al. Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: Explaining a weak nitrate response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1756–60 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knight, D. H., Fahey, T. J. & Running, S. W. Water and nutrient outflow from contrasting lodgepole pine forests in Wyoming. Ecol. Monogr. 55, 29–48 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikkelson, K. M. et al. Mountain pine beetle infestation impacts: Modeling water and energy budgets at the hill-slope scale. Ecohydrology 6, 64–72 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fishman, M. J. Methods of analysis by the US Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Determination of Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Water and Fluvial Sediments, vol. 93–125 (US Geol. Surv., 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sibold, J. S. et al. Influences of secondary disturbances on lodgepole pine stand development in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecol. Appl. 17, 1638–1655 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. WSC-1204787, the USGS-National Institute of Water Resources under Grant No. 2011CO245G Subaward G-2914-1 and through the Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Budgets program and USGS/NPS Partnership program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.A.B. and R.M.M. conceived the study, L.A.B. and D.W.C. collected and analysed the data, and L.A.B., R.M.M., D.W.C. and J.E.M. interpreted results and contributed to writing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lindsay A. Bearup or Reed M. Maxwell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bearup, L., Maxwell, R., Clow, D. et al. Hydrological effects of forest transpiration loss in bark beetle-impacted watersheds. Nature Clim Change 4, 481–486 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2198

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing