Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Towards a classification of biomarkers of neuropsychiatric disease: from encompass to compass

Abstract

There is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the study of neuropsychiatric disease. The neuropsychiatric field lags behind others such as oncology, wherein, rather than using 'biomarker' as a blanket term for a diverse range of clinical phenomena, biomarkers have been actively classified into separate categories, including prognostic and predictive tests. A similar taxonomy is proposed for neuropsychiatric diseases in which the core biology remains relatively unknown. This paper divides potential biomarkers into those of (1) risk, (2) diagnosis/trait, (3) state or acuity, (4) stage, (5) treatment response and (6) prognosis, and provides illustrative exemplars. Of course, biomarkers rely on available technology and, as we learn more about the neurobiological correlates of neuropsychiatric disorders, we will realize that the classification of biomarkers across these six categories can change, and some markers may fit into more than one category.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guintivano J, Arad M, Gould TD, Payne JL, Kaminsky ZA . Antenatal prediction of postpartum depression with blood DNA methylation biomarkers. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 560–567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lencz T, Knowles E, Davies G, Guha S, Liewald DC, Starr JM et al. Molecular genetic evidence for overlap between general cognitive ability and risk for schizophrenia: a report from the Cognitive Genomics consorTium (COGENT). Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 168–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwarz E, Guest PC, Rahmoune H, Harris LW, Wang L, Leweke FM et al. Identification of a biological signature for schizophrenia in serum. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kapczinski F, Dal-Pizzol F, Teixeira AL, Magalhaes PV, Kauer-Sant'Anna M, Klamt F et al. A systemic toxicity index developed to assess peripheral changes in mood episodes. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15: 784–786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandes BS, Berk M, Turck CW, Steiner J, Goncalves CA . Decreased peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels are a biomarker of disease activity in major psychiatric disorders: a comparative meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 750–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewczuk P, Kamrowski-Kruck H, Peters O, Heuser I, Jessen F, Popp J et al. Soluble amyloid precursor proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid as novel potential biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15: 138–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolkowitz OM, Mellon SH, Epel ES, Lin J, Reus VI, Rosser R et al. Resting leukocyte telomerase activity is elevated in major depression and predicts treatment response. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 164–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rethorst CD, Toups MS, Greer TL, Nakonezny PA, Carmody TJ, Grannemann BD et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines as predictors of antidepressant effects of exercise in major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 1119–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CH, Lee CS, Lee MT, Ouyang WC, Chen CC, Chong MY et al. Variant GADL1 and response to lithium therapy in bipolar I disorder. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 119–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnadas R, Cavanagh J . Depression: an inflammatory illness? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 495–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MB is supported by a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship 1059660, and has received grant support from NIH, Simons Autism Foundation, Cancer Council of Victoria, CRC for Mental Health, Stanley Medical Research Foundation, MBF, NHMRC, Beyond Blue, Geelong Medical Research Foundation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Organon, Novartis, Mayne Pharma and Servier. JJM is supported by NHMRC John Cade Fellowship 1056929. AA is supported by Brain and Behaviour Foundation (NARSAD) and the Canadian Institute of Health Research. SJT is supported by the State of Minnesota.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Davis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MB has been a speaker for Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Synthelabo, Servier, Solvay and Wyeth, and served as a consultant to Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck and Servier. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, J., Maes, M., Andreazza, A. et al. Towards a classification of biomarkers of neuropsychiatric disease: from encompass to compass. Mol Psychiatry 20, 152–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.139

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links