Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal and pediatric nutrition

Evaluation of the wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT for estimating activity energy expenditure in preschool children

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Easy-to-use and accurate methods to assess free-living activity energy expenditure (AEE) in preschool children are required. The aims of this study in healthy preschool children were to (a) evaluate the ability of the wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT to predict free-living AEE and (b) assess wear compliance using a 7-day, 24-h protocol.

Subjects/Methods:

Participants were 40 Swedish children (5.5±0.2 years) in the Mobile-based intervention intended to stop obesity in preschoolers (MINISTOP) obesity prevention trial. Total energy expenditure (TEE) was assessed using the doubly labeled water method during 14 days. AEE was calculated as (TEEx0.9) minus predicted basal metabolic rate. The ActiGraph accelerometer was worn on the wrist for 7 days and outputs used were mean of the daily and awake filtered vector magnitude (mean VM total and mean VM waking).

Results:

The ActiGraph was worn for 7 (n=34, 85%), 6 (n=4, 10%), 5 (n=1, 2.5%) and 4 (n=1, 2.5%) days (a valid day was 600 awake minutes). Alone, mean VM total and mean VM waking were able to explain 14% (P=0.009) and 24% (P=0.001) of the variation in AEE, respectively. By incorporating fat and fat-free mass in the models 58% (mean VM total) and 62% (mean VM waking) in the variation of AEE was explained (P<0.001).

Conclusions:

The wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT in combination with body composition variables explained up to the 62% of the variation in AEE. Given the high wear compliance, the wrist-worn ActiGraph has the potential to provide useful information in studies where physical activity in preschool children is measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.

  2. Tremblay MS, Aguilar-Farias N, Akinroye KK, Al-Kuwari MG, Amornsriwatanakul A, Aubert S et al. Global Matrix 2.0: report card grades on the physical activity of children and youth comparing 38 countries. J Phys Act Health 2016; 13 (Suppl 2), S343–S366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hills AP, Okely AD, Baur LA . Addressing childhood obesity through increased physical activity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010; 6: 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.

  5. International Atomic Energy Agency Assessment of Body Composition and Total Energy Expenditure in Humans Using Stable Isotope Techniques, IAEA Human Health Series No. 3. International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2009.

  6. Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR . Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44 (Suppl 1), S5–S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeran SSA, Pischon T . Prediction of activity related energy expenditure using accelerometer derived physical activity under free-living conditions—a systematic review. Int J Obes 2016; 40: 1187–1197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairclough SJ, Noonan R, Rowlands AV, van Hees V, Knowles Z, Boddy LM . Wear compliance and activity in children wearing wrist and hip-mounted accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freedson PS, John D . Comment on 'estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip and wrist'. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45: 962–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Hees VT, Renstrom F, Wright A, Gradmark A, Catt M, Chen KY et al. Estimation of daily energy expenditure in pregnant and non-pregnant women using a wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometer. PLoS One 2011; 6: e22922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY . Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1019–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez-Alarcon M, Merrifield J, Fields DA, Hilario-Hailey T, Franklin FA, Shewchuk RM et al. Ability of the actiwatch accelerometer to predict free-living energy expenditure in young children. Obesity Res 2004; 12: 1859–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sijtsma A, Schierbeek H, Goris AH, Joosten KF, van Kessel I, Corpeleijn E et al. Validation of the TracmorD triaxial accelerometer to assess physical activity in preschool children. Obesity 2013; 21: 1877–1883.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Henriksson H, Forsum E, Lof M . Evaluation of Actiheart and a 7 d activity diary for estimating free-living total and activity energy expenditure using criterion methods in 1.5- and 3-year-old children. Br J Nutr 2014; 111: 1830–1840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery C, Reilly JJ, Jackson DM, Kelly LA, Slater C, Paton JY et al. Relation between physical activity and energy expenditure in a representative sample of young children. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 591–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Butte NF, Wong WW, Lee JS, Adolph AL, Puyau MR, Zakeri IF . Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 1216–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ojiambo R, Konstabel K, Veidebaum T, Reilly J, Verbestel V, Huybrechts I et al. Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study. J Appl Physiol 2012; 113: 1530–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Jackson DM, Slater C, Grant S et al. Validation of Actigraph accelerometer estimates of total energy expenditure in young children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006; 1: 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Delisle C, Sandin S, Forsum E, Henriksson H, Trolle-Lagerros Y, Larsson C et al. A web- and mobile phone-based intervention to prevent obesity in 4-year-olds (MINISTOP): a population-based randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Delisle Nystrom C, Sandin S, Henriksson P, Henriksson H, Trolle Lagerros Y, Larsson C et al. Mobile-based intervention intended to stop obesity in pre-school children: the MINISTOP randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 105: 1327–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leppanen MH, Nystrom CD, Henriksson P, Pomeroy J, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB et al. Physical activity intensity, sedentary behavior, body composition and physical fitness in 4-year-old children: results from the MINISTOP trial. Int J Obes 2016; 40: 1126–1133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Delisle Nystrom C, Forsum E, Henriksson H, Trolle-Lagerros Y, Larsson C, Maddison R et al. A mobile phone based method to assess energy and food intake in young children: a validation study against the doubly labelled water method and 24h dietary recalls. Nutrients 2016; 8 (1). doi:10.3390/nu8010050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davies PS, Coward WA, Gregory J, White A, Mills A . Total energy expenditure and energy intake in the pre-school child: a comparison. Br J Nutr 1994; 72: 13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weir J . New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949; 109: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Black A, Prentice A, Coward W . Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1986; 40: 381–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wells JC, Williams JE, Chomtho S, Darch T, Grijalva-Eternod C, Kennedy K et al. Pediatric reference data for lean tissue properties: density and hydration from age 5 to 20 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 610–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. The Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Nutrient Recommendations 2012, Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5th edn. The Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012.

  28. Bouten CV, Koekkoek KT, Verduin M, Kodde R, Janssen JD . A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 136–147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadeh A, Lavie P, Scher A, Tirosh E, Epstein R . Actigraphic home-monitoring sleep-disturbed and control infants and young children: a new method for pediatric assessment of sleep–wake patterns. Pediatrics 1991; 87: 494–499.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadeh A, Sharkey KM, Carskadon MA . Activity-based sleep–wake identification: an empirical test of methodological issues. Sleep 1994; 17: 201–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Collings PJ, Brage S, Ridgway CL, Harvey NC, Godfrey KM, Inskip HM et al. Physical activity intensity, sedentary time, and body composition in preschoolers. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97: 1020–1028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Armitage P, Berry G, Mathews JNS . Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Assah FK, Ekelund U, Brage S, Corder K, Wright A, Mbanya JC et al. Predicting physical activity energy expenditure using accelerometry in adults from sub-Sahara Africa. Obesity 2009; 17: 1588–1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kleinbaum DG KL, Nizam A, Muller KE . Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, 4th edn. Thomson: Belmont, CA, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberger ME, Haskell WL, Albinali F, Mota S, Nawyn J, Intille S . Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45: 964–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonomi AG, Plasqui G, Goris AH, Westerterp KR . Estimation of free-living energy expenditure using a novel activity monitor designed to minimize obtrusiveness. Obesity 2010; 18: 1845–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Masse LC, Fulton JE, Watson KL, Mahar MT, Meyers MC, Wong WW . Influence of body composition on physical activity validation studies using doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96: 1357–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Corder K, Brage S, Wright A, Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Yamuna A et al. Physical activity energy expenditure of adolescents in India. Obesity 2010; 18: 2212–2219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Coward WA, Cole TJ. The double labeled water method for the measurement of energy expenditure in humans: risks and benefits. In: Whitehead RG, Prentice A (eds). New Techniques in Nutritional Research, 9th edn. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1991; pp 139–176.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Speakman JR . Double Labelled Water. Theory and Practice, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Public Health Agency of SwedenOverweight and Obesity National Statistics, 2014. Available at: http://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/ (last accessed September 2016).

  43. Bornhorst C, Bel-Serrat S, Pigeot I, Huybrechts I, Ottavaere C, Sioen I et al. Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure. Clin Nutr 2014; 33: 79–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wikland KA, Luo ZC, Niklasson A, Karlberg J . Swedish population-based longitudinal reference values from birth to 18 years of age for height, weight and head circumference. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91: 739–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Statistics Sweden. Educational Attainment of the Population, 2015. Available at: http://www.scb.se/ (last accessed September 2016).

  46. Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE . Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 35 (Suppl), 1169–1175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts SB, Young VR . Energy costs of fat and protein deposition in the human infant. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 951–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cole TJ, Lobstein T . Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 2012; 7: 284–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

CDN was supported by the SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation; ML by the Swedish Research Council (project no. 2012–2883), the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (2012-0906), Bo and Vera Axson Johnsons Foundation and Karolinska Institutet; and PH by Henning and Johan Throne-Holst Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Delisle Nyström.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delisle Nyström, C., Pomeroy, J., Henriksson, P. et al. Evaluation of the wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT for estimating activity energy expenditure in preschool children. Eur J Clin Nutr 71, 1212–1217 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.114

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links