Stop Task After-Effects
The Extent of Slowing During the Preparation and Execution of Movement
Abstract
In the stop task, response time to the go signal is increased when the immediately preceding trial involves the presentation of a stop signal. A recent explanation suggests that these “after-effects” are due to mechanisms that occur prior to the completion of response selection processes, but it is possible that they instead may reflect a slowed motor response (i.e., deliberate slowing after response selection). The participants completed a novel stop task that allows a differentiation between the time taken to prepare a movement (which incorporates response selection processes) and the time taken to execute a movement (i.e., speed of motor response). If mechanisms underlying stop task after-effects occur prior to the completion of response selection processes, then slowing should only occur during movement preparation. Movement preparation and execution time during go trials were analysed according to the characteristics of the preceding trial. Slowing after a stop trial was found during movement preparation time (regardless of inhibition success on that stop trial), and it further increased during this period when the primary task stimulus was repeated. There was also evidence for general after-effects during movement execution time, but no effect of repetition. These findings support the current theoretical accounts that suggest that repetition-based stop task after-effects are attributable to a mechanism that occurs prior to the completion of response selection processes, and also indicate a possible switch to a more conservative response set (as in signal detection theory terms) that results in deliberate slowing of movement.
References
(2003). Assessing inhibitory control: A revised approach to the stop signal task. Journal of Attentional Disorders, 6, 153–161.
(2006). Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 444–455.
(2007). Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 47, 35–49.
(2006). Associations between laboratory measures of executive inhibitory control and self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 285–294.
(2008). Response inhibition and impulsivity in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 157, 251–254.
(2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behaviour. Psychophysiology, 40, 895–903.
(2006). Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop task. NeuroImage, 32, 1918–1929.
(1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In , Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego: Academic Press.
(1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.
(2004). Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1034–1040.
(1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.
(1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART) test manual. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.
(1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.
(1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509–518.
(2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343.
(2008). Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: Memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1229–1235.
(2008). Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: Repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 413–426.
(2006). Stopping dead in one’s tracks: Motor inhibition following incidental evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 479–490.
