Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Workplace Incivility Scale and the Instigated Workplace Incivility Scale
Abstract
Abstract. The quality of workplace social environments has been widely recognized as having an important role in employees’ experience of their workplace, which is confirmed by recent research. The greater frequency of incivility, in contrast to the more intense forms of negative workplace interactions, expands opportunities for understanding the social dynamics of workplaces. Important aspects of this research are potential cultural variations in workplace social behavior. Valid translations of measures for the core constructs are part of the essential infrastructure to support such research endeavors. To assess uncivil behavior at the workplace, we prepared a German translation of the Workplace Incivility Scale and the Instigated Workplace Incivility Scale. Our analysis of the responses from 2,168 Austrian workers indicated that the translation of both scales into German was successful, and that the concept of incivility can indeed be transferred to the German-speaking population. The factor solution was comparable to the original version of the scales. Criterion validity coefficients lay in a similar range as the coefficients found in previous studies with Canadian samples. The availability of the scales should stimulate research on incivility among the German-speaking population and can help in organization-diagnostic processes.
References
2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace civility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 595–614. doi 10.1348/096317905X26822
(2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998
(2015). Areas of worklife as predictors of occupational health – A validation study in two German samples. Burnout Research, 2, 60–70. doi 10.1016/j.burn.2015.05.001
(1998). Managerial stress und burnout: A collaborative international study (CISMS). Die deutsche Untersuchung. Munich, Germany: Technische Universität, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie.
(2007). From insult to injury: Explaining the impact of incivility. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 335–350. doi 10.1080/01973530701665108
(1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
(2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75. doi 10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097
(2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi 10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64
(1991).
(A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality . In R. DienstbierEd., Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.2007). Does your coworker know what you’re doing? Convergence of self- and peer-reports of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 41–60. doi 10.1037/1072-5245.14.1.41
(2010). When respect deteriorates: Incivility as a moderator of the stressor–strain relationship among hospital workers. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 878–888. doi 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01139.x
(2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1134–1145. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134
(2015). Models of workplace incivility: The relationships to instigated incivility and negative outcomes. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1–10. doi 10.1155/2015/920239
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2002). Specific influences of job satisfaction and work characteristics on the intention to quit: Results of different studies. Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 596–603.
(2008). PAZ Profilanalyse der Arbeitszufriedenheit. Manual Wiener Testsystem [
(Profile analysis of job satisfaction. Test manual in Vienna test system ]. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried GmbH.2009). Workplace empowerment, incivility, and burnout: Impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management, 17, 302–311. doi 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x
(2013). Analyzing and theorizing the dynamics of the workplace incivility crisis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
(2012a). Getting better and staying better: Assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes 1 year after a civility intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 425–434. doi 10.1037/a0029540
(2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274. doi 10.1037/a0024442
(1999). Six areas of worklife: A model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21, 472–489.
(2012b). Workplace relationships as demands and resources: A model of burnout and work engagement. Ciencia & Trabajo, 14, 23–30.
(2010). Generational differences in distress, attitudes and incivility among nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 970–980. doi 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01168.x
(2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483
(2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95
(2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498–512. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498
(2011). Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: Researcher and practitioner collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 296–300. doi 10.1002/job.784
(2016). A concise, content valid, gender invariant measure of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 352–365. doi 10.1037/ocp0000017
(2010). Testing a moderated mediational model of workgroup incivility: The roles of organizational trust and group regard. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 3148–3168. doi 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00695.x
(2011). Stress and job satisfaction as antecedents of workplace deviant behavior. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, 46–51.
(2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154. doi 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
(1996).
(The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey . In C. MaslachS. E. JacksonM.P. LeiterEds., The Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (3rd ed., pp. 19–26). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
(2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. doi 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
(2006). Aspekte des Berufslebens [
(Aspects of working life ]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.2010). A daily investigation of the role of manager empathy on employee well-being. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 127–140. doi 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.001
(2012). The employee as a punching bag: The effect of multiple sources of incivility on employee withdrawal behavior and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 121–139. doi 10.1002/job.767
(1999). Adapting instruments for use in multiple languages and cultures: A review of the ITC guidelines for test adaptions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 258–269. doi 10.1027//1015-5759.15.3.258
(2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 156–167. doi 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004
(2017). Workplace incivility in Japan: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the modified Work Incivility Scale. Journal of Occupational Health, 59, 237–246. doi 10.1539/joh.16-0196-OA
(2000). Review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi 10.1177/109442810031002
(2010). Time precedence in the relationship between organizational climate and organizational performance: A cross-lagged study at the business unit level. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1712–1732. doi 10.1080/09585192.2010.500491
(2013). The development and validation of the Incivility from Customers Scale. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 310–326. doi 10.1037/a0032753
(