Abstract
This study examined auditors' perceptions of the relative level of risk of fraud and material irregularities associated with the presence of six red flag factors and also evaluated the quality of auditors' judgements. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, subjects were asked to rank the importance of 15 factors that proxy the existence of material misstatements. Based on the responses to this questionnaire, 6 of the most important factors were identified and included in the second stage, a lens model experiment. In the lens model experiment, 30 experienced auditors from a cross-section of Big 6 firms were used as subjects in a repeated-measures ANOVA design. Results showed that misstatements in prior audits and indicators of going-concern problems were perceived to be the most significant factors in alerting auditors to the risk of fraud and material irregularities. In making these judgements, auditors demonstrated a relatively high level of consensus and consistency. However, the two most important factors in the lens model experiment are not the same as the results of the first survey suggesting that the first group of respondents, faced with a simple questionnaire, used heuristics in their decision making. The results have implications for audit practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, W. S. and M. B. Romney: 1986, ‘Red-Flagging Management Fraud: A Validation’, Advances in Accounting, 323–333.
Albrecht, W. S., D. J. Cherrington,I. R. Payne,A. V. Roe andM. B. Romney: 1980, ‘Auditor Involvement in the Detection of Fraud’, in R. K. Elliott andJ. J. Willingham (eds.), Management Fraud: Detection and Deterrence (Petrocelli Books).
Anonymous: 1994, ‘Auditors’ Liability: If the Cap Fits’, Economist (February 26), 83.
Arnold, V.: 1997, ‘Judgement and Decision Making, Part I: The Impact of Environmental Factors’, in V. Arnold andSteve G. Sutton (eds.), Behavioral Accounting Research: Foundations and Frontiers, Chapter 2 (American Accounting Association), pp. 49–88.
Ashton, R. H.: 1974, ‘An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgements’, Journal of Accounting Research (Spring), 143–157.
Ashton, R. H.: 1982, Studies in Accounting Research, No. 11, Human Information Processing in Accounting, American Accounting Association.
Bell, T. B., S. Szykowny, andJ. J. Willingham: 1991, ‘Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Cascaded Logic Approach’, working paper (December).
Birnberg, J. G. and J. F. Shields: 1989, ‘Three Decades of Behavioral Accounting Research: A Search for Order’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 1, 23–74.
Boatsman, J. R. and J. C. Robertson: 1974, ‘Policy-Capturing on Selected Materiality Judgements’, The Accounting Review 49, 342–352.
Carmichael, D. R.: 1988, ‘The Auditor's New Guide to Errors, Irregularities and Illegal Acts’, Journal of Accountancy (September), 40–48.
Catlett, G. R.: 1975, ‘Relationship of Auditing Standards to Detection of Fraud’, CPA Journal (April), 13.
Cochran, W. G. and G. M. Cox: 1957, Experimental Designs (John Wiley).
Colbert, J.: 1987, ‘Use the Concept of Inherent Risk-It Helps’, The Internal Auditor (April), 45–48.
Colbert, J.: 1988, ‘Inherent Risk: An Investigation of Auditors' Judgements’, Accounting Organizations and Society 13(2), 111–121.
Gul, F. A.: 1991, ‘Size of Audit Fees and Perceptions of Auditors Ability to Resist Management Pressure in Audit Conflict Situations’, ABACUS (September), 162–172.
Gul, F. A. and C. Windsor: 1994, ‘The Effects of Demand Characteristics in Auditor Independence Studies’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 1, 133–146.
Gwilliam, D.: 1991, ‘The Auditor's Liability to Third Parties’, in M. Sherer andS. Turley (eds.), Current Issues in Auditing ( Paul Chapman Publishing, London).
Hackenbrack, K.: 1993, ‘The Effect of Experience with Different Sized Clients on Auditor Evaluation of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Indicators’, Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice 12 (Spring), 99–110.
Hoffman, P. J., P. Slovic andL. G. Rorer: 1968, ‘An Analysis-of-Variance Model for the Assessment of Configural Cue Utilization in Clinical Judgement’, Psychological Bulletin 69, 338–349.
Humphrey, C., P. Moiser andS. Turley: 1993, ‘The Audit Expectation Gap in Britain: An Empirical Investigation’, Accounting and Business Research 23, 395–411.
Jones, J. J. and M. W. Maher: 1987, ‘Characteristics of Companies Investigated by the SEC for Fraudulent Financial Reporting’, unpublished working paper, University of Michigan ( January).
Joyce, E. J.: 1976, ‘Expert Judgement in Audit Programme Planning’, Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 29–60.
Joyce, E. J. and R. Libby: 1982, ‘Behavioral Research in Audit Decision Making’, Journal of Accounting Literature, 103–123.
Konrath, L. F.: 1989, ‘Classification of Audit Risk Factors for Planning and Program Design’, Ohio CPA Journal 48, 6–11.
Knapp, M. C.: 1985, ‘Audit Conflict: An Empirical Study of the Perceived Ability of Auditors to Resist Management Pressure’, The Accounting Review 60(2), 202–211.
Libby, R.: 1981, Accounting and Human Information Processing: Theory and Applications ( Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Libby, R. and B. L. Lewis: 1982, ‘Human Information Processing Research in Accounting: The State of the Art in 198 2’, Accounting, Organizations & Society 7(3), 231–285.
Loebbecke, J. K., M. M. Eining andJ. J. Willingham Jr.: 1989, ‘Auditors’ Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Fall), 1–25.
Louwers, T. J., L. A. Ponemon andR. R. Radtke: 1997, ‘Examining Accountants’ Ethical Behavior: A Review and Implications for Future Research’, in V. Arnold andSteve G. Sutton (eds.), Behavioral Accounting Research: Foundations and Frontiers, Chapter 6 (American Accounting Association), pp. 188–221.
Macdonald, W. A.: 1988, Report of the Commission to Study the Public's Expectation of Auditors (Canadian Institute of Auditors).
Mear R. and M. Firth: 1987, ‘Cue Usage and Selfsight of Financial Analysts’, The Accounting Review 62(1), 176–182.
Pincus, K. V.: 1989, ‘The Efficacy of a Red Flag Questionnaire for Assessing the Possibility of Fraud’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(1/2), 153–163.
Price Waterhouse: 1985, Challenge and Opportunity for the Accounting Profession: Strengthening the Public's Confidence (Price Waterhouse).
Romney, M. B., W. S. Albrecht andC. J. Cherrington: 1980, ‘Auditors and the Detection of Fraud’, Journal of Accountancy (May), 63–69.
Simon, D. T., S. Teo andG. Trompeter: 1992, ‘A Comparative Study of the Market for Audit Services in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore’, International Journal of Accounting Education and Research 27(3), 234–240.
Sorenson, J., H. Grove andF. Selto: 1983, ‘Detecting Management Fraud: An Empirical Approach’, in Symposium on Auditing Research 1982 (Department of Accountancy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Torgerson, W. S.: 1958, Theory and Methods of Scaling ( John Wiley).
Trotman, K. T.: 1990, ‘The Effect of the Distribution of Cases on Judgmental Consensus’, Accounting & Finance 30(1), 39–49.
Tsui, J. and F. A. Gul: 1996, ‘Auditors' Behavior in an Audit Conflict Situation: A Research Note on the Role of Locus of Control and Ethical Reasoning’, Accounting, Organizations & Society 21(1), 41–51.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1974, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, f1124–1131.
Wallace, W.: 1983, ‘Detecting Management Fraud: An Empirical Approach-A Critique’, in Symposium on Auditing Research 1982 (Department of Accountancy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majid, A., Gul, F.A. & Tsui, J.S.L. An Analysis of Hong Kong Auditors' Perceptions of the Importance of Selected Red Flag Factors in Risk Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 263–274 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763420754
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763420754