Skip to main content
Log in

Controlling soil water content in fertiliser dissolution experiments

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phosphorus lost in runoff from agricultural land leads to the enrichment of surface waters and contributes to algal blooms. Fertilisers are one source of this P. To compare the water available P of different fertiliser formulations in the laboratory it is necessary to control environmental conditions, temperature, relative humidity and soil water content, prior to simulating rainfall. Two chambers were designed in which relative humidity and soil water content were controlled using salt solutions. An initial design comprising a sealed chamber with three layers of soil samples over a salt bath was found to be inferior to a single layer design. The changes in water content of soil samples were used to test the single layer chamber in a constant temperature environment (15 °C) using a saturated KCl solution (90% relative humidity). Based on the final soil water content of the samples, the spatial variation within the chamber was within tolerable limits. The single layer chamber was used for a simulation experiment comparing the water available P of two commercial fertilisers. Using a saturated resorcinol solution (95% relative humidity) soil samples were equilibrated at 15 °C for 21 days, fertiliser added, and the water available P measured up to 600 h after fertiliser application. The results indicate that the amount of water available P was related to the fertiliser compound and exponentially related to the time since fertiliser application. It was concluded that the single layer chamber is suitable for controlling relative humidity and soil water content in trials such as these where the water available P of fertilisers are being compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (1996) Draft Goulburn Broken catchment water quality strategy. A component of the Goulburn Broken regional catchment strategy. Goulburn Broken Catchment and Land Protection Board, Tatura

  • Butler R & Brain P (1993) Nonlinear contrasts in ANOVA. Genstat Newsletter 29: 20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen P and Rosich RS (1979) Effects of rural and urban sources of phosphorus of Lake Burley Griffin. Prog Water Tech 11: 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen P (1991) Land use and declining water quality. Aust J Soil Water Conserv 4: 4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC Sharpley A.N & Lemunyon JL (1998) Agricultural phosphorus and eutrophication: A symposium overview. J Environ Qual 27: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane JF & Allan RK (1968) A chamber for studying the effect of relative humidity and soil moisture on insect eggs. Can Entom 100: 358–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat Committee (1996) Genstat 5 Release 3.2 Command Language Manual. Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour A (1995) The Genstat TwoD procedure. NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin EP & Hamilton BH (1993) Fertilizers and eutrophication in southwestern Australia: Setting the scene. Fert Res 36: 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford I (1989) Phosphate behaviour in soils. Agric. Sci. 2: 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberty A & Diamond D (1996) Determination of phosphorus by flow injection analysis colorimetry. Lachat Instruments, Inc., Milawaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell R (1996) Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin S (1962) The control of conditioning atmospheres by saturated salt solutions. J Sci Instrum. 39: 370–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash D & Murdoch C (1997) Phosphorus in runoff from a fertile dairy pasture. Aust J Soil Res 35: 419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash D & Halliwell D (1998) Fertilisers and phosphorus loss from productive grazing systems. Report, Agriculture Victoria, ISBN 0731142136

  • Payne D (1988) The behaviour of water in soil. In: Wild A (ed.) Russell's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, pp 315–337 Longman Scientific and Technical, Avon

    Google Scholar 

  • White RE (1987) Introduction to the Principles and Practices of Soil Science 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CH (1969) Moisture uptake by surface-applied superphosphate and movement of the phosphate and sulphate into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 7: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CH (1971) Reaction of surface-applied superphosphate with soil. II. Movement of the phosphorus and sulphur into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 9: 95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JF (1967) Humidity control in the laboratory using salt solutions — A review. J Appl Chem 17: 241–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barlow, K., Halliwell, D. & Nash, D. Controlling soil water content in fertiliser dissolution experiments. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 55, 7–14 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009816716466

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009816716466

Navigation