Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:05:24.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Attuning-with’, affect, and assemblages of relations in a transdisciplinary environmental education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Kathryn Riley Open the ORCID record for Kathryn Riley [Opens in a new window]  and
Peta White Open the ORCID record for Peta White [Opens in a new window]
Kathryn Riley
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Peta White*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: peta.white@deakin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In these Anthropocene times humans are vulnerable through the effects of socio-ecological crises and are responsible for attending to past, present and future socio-ecological injustices and challenges. The purpose of this article is to challenge discursive structures that influence knowledge acquisition about/of the world through binary logics, acknowledging that we are never apart from the world we are seeking to understand, but that we are entangled through a mutual (re)configuring with the world. Through storytelling and entangled poetry from outdoor education and environmental science education contexts, this article explores discursive/material forces (socially meaningful statements/affective intensities) enacted through pedagogies ‘attuning-with’. As pedagogies ‘attuning-with’ take up a relational ontology, in which sense-making is generated from the grounded, lived, embodied and embedded politics of location in relationship with broader ecologies of the world, they illuminate a transdisciplinary environmental education. A transdisciplinary environmental education is important for these Anthropocene times, because it not only promotes a multivocal approach to environmental education, but in acknowledging our inherent and intrinsic responsibility and accountability for the kinds of worlds that we are co-constituting, it provides opportunities to change the story of how we choose to live with/in/for these Anthropocene times.

Keywords

Attuning-withaffectassemblagetransdisciplinary environmental educationanthropocene
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , November 2019 , pp. 262 - 272
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adsit-Morris, C. (2017). Restorying environmental education: Figurations, fictions, and feral subjectivities. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Outdoor Learning. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/curriculum-connections/portfolios/outdoor-learning/Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20, 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92, 56–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelsen, L., & Murphie, A. (2010). An ethics of everyday infinities and powers: Felix Guattari on affect and the refrain. In Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G.J. (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 138–161). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Massumi, B., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fox, N.J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Design, methods and the research assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 99–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, A. (2015). Resisting becoming a glomus within posthuman theorizing: Mondialisation and embodied agency in educational research. In Snaza, N. & Weaver, J. (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research. (pp. 167–181). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2007). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2008). Otherworldly conversations, terran topics, local terms. In Alaimo, S. & Hekman, S. (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 157–185). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, P., & Nolan, K. (1999). A critical analysis of research in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 33, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Governing ‘eco-certified children’ through pastoral power: Critical perspectives on education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 21, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Timmerman, N., & De Danann Sitka-Sage, M. (2018). Wild pedagogies: Touchstones for re-negotiating education and the environment in the Anthropocene. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopnina, H., & Meijers, F. (2014). Education for sustainable development (ESD): Exploring theoretical and practical challenges. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15, 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, M., White, P., & Wooltorton, S. (2017). Embodying our future through collaboration: The change is in the doing. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, P.G., & Wattchow, B. (2009). Phenomenological deconstruction, slow pedagogy, and the corporeal turn in wild environmental/outdoor education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 15–32.Google Scholar
Payne, P., Rodrigues, C., de Moura Carvalho, I.C., Freire dos Santos, L.M., Aguayo, C., & Ghisloti Iared, V. (2018). Affectivity in environmental education (English). Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental, 13, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rautio, P. (2017). A super wild story: Shared human-pigeon lives and the questions they beg. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 722–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2019). Uncommon worlds: Toward an ecological aesthetics of childhood in the Anthropocene. In Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., & Barratt Hacking, E. (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature (pp. 1–23). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Seed, J., Macy, J., Flemming, P., & Naess, A. (1993). Thinking like a mountain: Towards a council of All Beings. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2005). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wals, A.E.J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenge? The role of education and lifelong learning. European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 52, 404–413.Google Scholar
Van Metre, S., & Weiler, B. (1983). The Earth speaks. Warrenville, IL: The Institute for Earth Education.Google Scholar