Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:07:00.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approaching Human Rights at the World Heritage Committee: Capturing Situated Conversations, Complexity, and Dynamism in Global Heritage Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

Peter Bille Larsen
Affiliation:
University of Lucerne, Switzerland; Email: peter.larsen@unilu.ch
Kristal Buckley
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria, Australia; Email: Kristal.buckley@deakin.edu.au

Abstract:

Social scientists are increasingly approaching the World Heritage Committee itself as an entry-point to understanding global heritage processes and phenomena. This article explores the subject of human rights in the operations of the World Heritage Committee—the decision-making body established by the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention. It seeks to address the epistemological and methodological implications of approaching the World Heritage Committee as a point of departure for understanding global heritage and rights dynamics. It builds on an “event ethnography” undertaken by the authors to understand how rights discourse appeared in multiple contexts during the Thirty-Ninth World Heritage Committee session held in Bonn, Germany, in June 2015.

In this article, we discuss the methodological and ontological implications of studying rights discourses in the context of World Heritage events and processes. We have a particular interest in the interplay of formal and informal dynamics, revealing the entangled and multi-sited processes that shape and are shaped by the annual event. While much of the debate and analysis in heritage studies is understandably concerned with formal decision-making processes and position-taking, this work demonstrates the significance of a range of informal dynamics in appreciating future possibilities.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Asian Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP). 2015. Submission to the Study of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples with Respect to Their Cultural Heritage. Eighth Session on the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP), 2024 July. Geneva: AIPP.Google Scholar
Baird, M. F. 2014. “Heritage, Human Rights, and Social Justice.” Heritage and Society 7, no. 2: 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, R. F. 2013. “The Power of Perseverance: Exploring Negotiation Dynamics at the World Intellectual Property Organisation.” In Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-Making in Multilateral Organisations, edited by Müller, B., 2349. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Bertacchini, E., Liuzza, C., and Meskell, L.. 2015. “Shifting the Balance of Power in the UNESCO World Heritage Committee: An Empirical Assessment.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23, no. 3: 331–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertacchini, E., Liuzza, C., Meskell, L., and Saccone, D.. 2016. “The Politicization of UNESCO World Heritage Decision Making.” Public Choice 167, nos. 1–2: 95129.Google Scholar
Blake, J. 2011. “Taking a Human Rights Approach to Cultural Heritage Protection.” Heritage and Society 4, no. 2: 199238.Google Scholar
Brumann, C. 2012. “Multilateral Ethnography: Entering the World Heritage Arena.” Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper No. 136. https://www.eth.mpg.de/pubs/wps/pdf/mpi-eth-working-paper-0136 (accessed 17 January 2018).Google Scholar
Brumann, C. 2014. “Heritage Agnosticism: A Third Path for the Study of Cultural Heritage.” Social Anthropology 22, no. 2: 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumann, C., and Berliner, D.. 2016. “Introduction: UNESCO World Heritage—Grounded?” In World Heritage on the Ground: Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Brumann, C. and Berliner, D., 134. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Buergin, R. 2015. “Contested Rights of Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples in Conflicts over Biocultural Diversity: The Case of Karen Communities in Thung Yai, a World Heritage Site in Thailand.” Modern Asian Studies 49, no. 6: 2022–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C., and Rössler, M.. 2013. Many Voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. 2016. “UNESCO and Cultural Heritage: Unexpected Consequences.” In A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by Logan, W., Nic Craith, M., and Kokkel, U., 322–36. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Coombe, R. J., and Baird, M. F.. 2016. “The Limits of Heritage: Corporate Interests and Cultural Rights on Resource Frontiers.” In A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by Logan, W., Nic Craith, M., and Kokkel, U., 337–54. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Disko, S., and Tugendhat, H., eds. 2014. World Heritage Sites and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
Ekern, S., Logan, W., Sauge, B., and Sinding-Larsen, A.. 2012. “Human Rights and World Heritage: Preserving Our Common Dignity through Rights-Based Approaches to Site Management.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 3: 213–25.Google Scholar
Hafstein, V., and Skrydstrup, M.. 2012. Europe at the Crossroads of Rights and Culture(s): A Companion to the Anthropology of Europe. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hauser-Schäublin, B. 2013. “Entangled in Artefacts: Governing Diverging Claims and Rights to Cultural Objects in UNESCO.” In Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-Making in Multilateral Organisations, edited by Müller, B., 154–74. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
ICOMOS. 2015. Sites of Japan’s Meiji Industrial Revolution (Japan), Doc. 1484. Paris: ICOMOS. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1484/documents/ (accessed 10 May 2017).Google Scholar
James, L. 2016. “The Symbolic Value of Expertise in International Heritage Diplomacy.” Future Anterior 13, no. 1: 8396.Google Scholar
James, L., and Winter, T.. 2017. “Expertise and the Making of World Heritage Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23, no. 1: 3651.Google Scholar
Kapferer, B. 2015. “Introduction: In the Event: Toward an Anthropology of Generic Moments.” In In the Event: Toward an Anthropology of Generic Moments, edited by Meinert, L. and Kapferer, B., 128. London: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Kraak, A. L. 2017. “Impediments to a Human Rights-Based Approach to Heritage Conservation: The Case of Bagan, Myanmar.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23, no. 4: 433–45.Google Scholar
Labadi, S. 2013. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B. 2012. World Heritage and Evaluation Processes Related to Communities and Rights: An Independent Review. IUCN report. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN World Heritage Programme.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B. 2013. “The Politics of Technicality: Guidance Culture in Environmental Governance and the International Sphere.” In Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-Making in Multilateral Organisations, edited by Müller, B., 75100. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B. 2016. Ethnic Minority Rights and World Heritage in Vietnam: The Case of Phong Nha Ke Bang. Policy brief. Geneva: Swiss Network for International Studies. http://projects.snis.ch/rights-world-heritage-system/policy-briefs/ (accessed 10 May 2017).Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B., ed. 2018. World Heritage and Human Rights: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific and Global Arena. London: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B., and Buckley, K.. 2016. The World Heritage Committee and Human Rights: Observations and Policy Lessons from the 39th Session (Bonn, 2015). Policy brief. Geneva: Swiss Network for International Studies. http://projects.snis.ch/rights-world-heritage-system/policy-briefs/ (accessed 10 May 2017).Google Scholar
Larsen, P. B., and Buckley, K.. 2018. “The World Heritage Committee and Human Rights: Learning from Event Ethnography.” In World Heritage and Human Rights: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific and Global Arena, edited by Larsen, P. B., 2948. London: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lilley, I., Buckley, K., and Kajlich, H.. 2018. “World Heritage and Human Rights in Australia: The Case of Fraser Island/K’gari.” In World Heritage and Human Rights: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific and Global Arena, edited by Larsen, P. B., 4969. London: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
Logan, W. 2012. “Cultural Diversity, Cultural Heritage and Human Rights: Towards Heritage Management as Human Rights-Based Cultural Practice.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 3: 231–44.Google Scholar
Logan, W. 2013. “Australia, Indigenous Peoples and World Heritage from Kakadu to Cape York: State Party Behaviour under the World Heritage Convention.” Journal of Social Archaeology 13, no. 2: 153–76.Google Scholar
Logan, W., Kockel, U., and Nic Craith, M.. 2016. “The New Heritage Studies: Origins and Evolution, Problems and Prospects.” In A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by Logan, W., Nic Craith, M., and Kokkel, U., 125. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. 2010. “Human Rights and Heritage Ethics.” Anthropological Quarterly 83, no. 4: 839–59.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. 2013a. “UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention at 40: Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation.” Current Anthropology 54, no. 4: 483–89.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. 2013b. “UNESCO and the Fate of the World Heritage Indigenous Peoples Council of Experts (WHIPCOE).” International Journal of Cultural Property 20, no. 2: 155–74.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. 2014. “States of Conservation: Protection, Politics, and Pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee.” Anthropological Quarterly 87, no. 1: 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., Liuzza, C., Bertacchini, E., and Saccone, D.. 2014. “Multilateralism and UNESCO World Heritage: Decision-Making, States Parties and Political Processes.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21, no. 5: 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. 2015. “Transacting UNESCO World Heritage: Gifts and Exchanges on a Global Scale.” Social Anthropology 23, no. 1: 1321.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., and Brumann, C.. 2015. “UNESCO and New World Orders.” In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by Meskell, L., 2242. Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nieć, H., ed. 1998. Cultural Rights and Wrongs: A Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris and Leicester: UNESCO Publishing and Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
Müller, B., ed. 2013. Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy-Making in Multilateral Organisations. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR). 2015. OHCHR in the Field: Asia and the Pacific. Geneva: OHCHR. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/OHCHRreport2015/allegati/12_Asia_and_the_Pacific_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
Oviedo, G., and Puschkarsky, T.. 2012. “World Heritage and Rights-Based Approaches to Nature Conservation.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 3: 285–96.Google Scholar
Seeger, A. 2015. “Understanding UNESCO: A Complex Organization with Many Parts and Many Actors.” Journal of Folklore Research 52, nos. 2–3: 269–80.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1997. “Human Rights and Asian Values.” Sixteenth Morgenthau Memorial Lecture on Ethics and Foreign Policy, Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
Shaheed, F. 2011. Report of the Independent Expert in the Field of Cultural Rights. United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council, Doc. HRC/17/38. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Sinding-Larsen, A. 2012. “Our Common Dignity: Rights-Based Approaches to Heritage Management.” World Heritage Review 62: 5860.Google Scholar
Sinding-Larsen, A., and Larsen, P. B., eds. 2017. Case Studies Carried Out within the Our Common Dignity Initiative: World Heritage and Rights-based Approaches. Oslo: ICOMOS Norway and Partners.Google Scholar
Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavenhagen, R. 2012 [1998]. “Cultural Rights: A Social Science Perspective,” In Peasants, Culture and Indigenous Peoples, edited by Stavenhagen, R., 2952. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2015. World Heritage Committee: Summary Records of the Thirty-Ninth Session, Bonn, Germany, 28 June–8 July 2015, Doc. WHC-15/39.COM.INF.19. http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/39COM/decisions (accessed 10 May 2017).Google Scholar
Vrdoljak, A. F. 2013. “Human Rights and Culture Heritage in International Law.” In International Law for Common Goods: Normative Perspectives on Human Rights, Culture and Nature, edited by Lenzerini, F. and Vrdoljak, A. F., 139–75. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Winter, T. 2015. “Heritage Diplomacy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21, no. 10: 9971015.Google Scholar