Inactivation of microbes using compressed carbon dioxide—An environmentally sound disinfection process for medical fabrics
Introduction
In daily life, microorganisms are ubiquitous. However, only some of them are pathogens, causing infections. Fungi, moulds, vegetative bacteria and their persistent forms – spores – along with viruses, represent a wide range of possible threats for the human body. Infection paths can be direct contact, air and jointly used vehicles such as furniture, crockery and textiles [1]. This work focuses on the ‘oblique contact’ infection path stressing indirect transfer of microbes via contaminated objects namely medical textiles.
Nosocomial infections are those related to a stay in hospital [2] and Sheng et al. [3] regard this kind of infection to be very important. Therefore, in hospitals, many textiles have to meet high standards of disinfection [4]. Depending on the intended location or application for the textiles (e.g. bed sheets, clothes for staff in operating theatre and wound covers) and the material properties (natural or artificial fibres, e.g. polyester and manner of production), they often have to be treated intensively.
Conventional disinfection processes have major drawbacks. This becomes particularly clear in textile disinfection, where heat-sensitive material has to be treated frequently. Most physical treatment methods such as autoclaving damage the structure and reduce the product's lifetime, resulting in extra costs. Textural properties of textiles with their numerous and non-homogenous cavities also make it difficult to disinfect a fabric thoroughly by UV radiation or microwaves. The problem concerning disinfection by chemical means is three-fold. First, diffusion of the applied chemical regularly is very slow and increases treatment time. Second, residual chemicals can be harmful to the patients’ health and can cause skin irritation; as a result, wound covers and most implants cannot be treated chemically. Finally, most chemical disinfectants are flammable and toxic and constitute a significant danger to workers’ health and the environment [5].
The demand for an alternative low-temperature method is obvious. Preservation of physical properties and inertness of the treated material are basic requirements, which cannot be met by either ethylene oxide or gamma sterilisation [6], [7]. Furthermore, penetration of three-dimensional textile material – containing small pores and possibly constrictions at points of intersection of threads – must be assured. Evidently, conventional textiles and numerous (bio-)materials have similar characteristics concerning texture and porosity and could therefore be treated similarly. Moreover, as the field of tissue engineering expands, the bio-materials used will require mild inactivation methods for disinfection.
High-pressure (HP) CO2 treatment (50–500 bar) is a promising technique for disinfection that is already in use for various liquid food products such as orange juice and egg yolk. It allows the combination of mild treatment parameters [8], thus protecting fabric texture. Highly compressed gaseous, liquid or supercritical CO2 (T > 31 °C, p > 74 bar) is generally suitable for this process [9] but has not been investigated in detail for textile disinfection yet [10], [11], [12]. Alternative solvents – in particular highly compressed carbon dioxide – are of major importance for a wide range of applications. Due to its very advantageous physical properties (relatively high solvent power at elevated pressures, but low solvent power at atmospheric pressure), it is easy to design an integrated downstream process. Additionally, carbon dioxide is non-flammable, non-polar, inert, readily available and in the supercritical state it has favourable transport and pore-diffusion properties due to its low viscosity [13]. It can therefore accelerate processes which are limited by mass-transfer velocity or which have to overcome the obstacle of surface tension.
Industrial-scale plants using highly compressed CO2 are well-established for the treatment of coffee and tea, extraction of aromatic compounds, for nutritional purposes and dry cleaning [9]. High-pressure dry cleaning using CO2 has become well-known in recent years and several industrial-scale plants have started to work in US [14], [15], [16] and Europe [17]. Most importantly, the deficiencies concerning safety and environmental health issues of conventional dry cleaning can be minimised by using CO2.
In this paper, we present the efficacy of the HP CO2 disinfection on two species of bacteria attached to textile material. Most former evaluation approaches focussed on microbes in solution [18] but this required evaluation of microbes on textiles, so a novel evaluation method was developed and established. The significance of the most important parameters influencing the inactivation success was quantified through the application of statistical tools and the disinfection was described using an empirical model. Even though damage to natural or synthetic fibres by HP CO2 was not expected [19], the effect of the HP treatment on textile performance was assessed against standard requirements as demanded by textile manufacturers.
Section snippets
Bacterial cultures
Two non-sporeforming bacteria were tested in this study: Gram-negative Escherichia coli (DSMZ 498) and Gram-positive Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 4698). Stock cultures of both bacteria were incubated in Standard-I-nutrient broth (Merck, Germany) at 37 °C for 24 h. A concentrated glucose 15% (w/v) solution was added to the working broth and functioned as a cryo-protectant for the consecutive freeze–drying process.
Bacteria-contaminated textile samples
Vacuum-dried (remaining moisture, 1.4% ± 0.75%), circular textile swatches (diameter, 80 mm)
Disinfection success
Using experimental design plans allowed a screening of a wide range of parameters. A key objective of this work was to determine major parameters (Table 1) that influence the efficacy of the method. We chose the pressure range in order to examine the effect of either liquid, gaseous or supercritical carbon dioxide. Accordingly, the temperatures were selected assuring they did not exceed heat stress of conventional washing processes. The treatment time is comparable to a steam-based process,
Conclusions
This research has demonstrated that HP CO2 can successfully be used to disinfect textiles. It was shown that the inactivation of adherent, vegetative microorganisms is attainable in a low-temperature process and that even pressures as low as 50 bar assure complete disinfection of the textile material. The textile properties investigated were not negatively influenced. Outcomes of the textile investigations of this research are very likely transferable to other objects based on fabric, to objects
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding (Project No. 0330470). Furthermore, we are most grateful to Dr. Cleve and Dr. Nickisch-Hartfiel from University of Applied Sciences for their support during this project regarding mathematical modelling and microbiological concerns.
References (31)
- et al.
Comparative impact of hospital-acquired infections on medical costs, length of hospital stay and outcome between community hospitals and medical centres
J. Hosp. Infect.
(2005) How hospital linen and laundry services are provided
J. Hosp. Infect.
(1994)Impact of sterilization on the porous design and cell behaviour in collagen sponges prepared for tissue engineering
Biomaterials
(2002)Effect of several sterilisation techniques on homogeneous self assembled monolayers
Colloids Surf.
(2005)- et al.
Microbial inactivation by high-pressure
J. Supercrit. Fluids
(2002) - et al.
Disinfection of textile materials contaminated with E. coli in liquid carbon dioxide
J. Cleaner Prod.
(2005) Dehydrogenase activity in soil: a comparison between the TTC and INT assay under their optimum conditions
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(1997)- et al.
Inactivation and sub-lethal injury of foodborne pathogens by high pressure processing: evaluation with conventional media and thin agar layer method
Food Res. Int.
(2004) - et al.
Assessment of high pressure induced damage on Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG by flow cytometry
Food Microbiol.
(2004) High hydrostatic pressure inactivation of vegetative microorganisms, aerobic and anaerobic spores in pork Marengo, a low acidic particulate food product
Meat Sci.
(2005)
Thermal inactivation of bacteria—a new predictive model for the combined effect of three environmental factors: temperature, pH and water activity
Food Res. Int.
Structural model requirements to describe microbial inactivation during a mild heat treatment
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
Praktische Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltschutz
Disinfection, Sterilisation and Preservation
A history of dry cleaners and sources of solvent releases from dry cleaning equipment
Environ. Forensics
Cited by (30)
Supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> sterilization: An effective treatment to reprocess FFP3 face masks and to reduce waste during COVID-19 pandemic
2022, Science of the Total EnvironmentHighly precision carbon dioxide acoustic wave sensor with minimized humidity interference
2021, Sensors and Actuators, B: ChemicalCitation Excerpt :As one of the key greenhouse gases on earth, carbon dioxide (CO2) plays an important role in various fields such as manufacture and electronic industries [1], agriculture [2], and medicine [3].
Green technologies for food processing: Principal considerations
2019, Innovative Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing, Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Nutrients and Bioactive CompoundsApplications of liquid carbon dioxide for removal of surface contamination
2018, Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques Volume 11Tuneable textile cleaning and disinfection process based on supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> and Pickering emulsions
2016, Journal of Supercritical FluidsCitation Excerpt :The disinfection of textiles is of extreme importance when dealing with materials targeted for special uses such as hospital textiles and the proposed treatment must be safe and must not compromise patients safety and health [19,20,22]. On the other hand conventional textile treatments such as UV-radiation or chemical disinfection, seem to be insufficient, time consuming, while they can be held responsible for causing additional health problems to patients such as skin irritation [19,21,23]. Textile disinfection is also a very important issue for historical textiles, while their protection has attracted scientists in developing safe and effective methods in textile treatment [24,25].