Suboptimal bone status for adolescents with low motor competence and developmental coordination disorder—It’s sex specific

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Bone health differences vary between boys and girls with LMC/DCD.

  • Boys with LMC/DCD had less robust bones than healthy age-matched Australian boys.

  • Girls with LMC/DCD had similar bone health to healthy age-matched Australian girls.

Abstract

Background

Australian adolescents with low motor competence (LMC) have higher fracture rates and poorer bone health compared to European normative data, but currently no normative data exists for Australians.

Aims

To examine whether there were bone health differences in Australian adolescents with LMC or Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) when compared to typically developing age-matched Australian adolescents.

Methods and Procedures

Australian adolescents aged 12–18 years with LMC/DCD (n = 39; male = 27; female = 12) and an Australian comparison sample (n = 188; boys = 101; girls = 87) undertook radial and tibial peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) scans. Stress Strain Index (SSI (mm3)), Total Bone Area (TBA (mm2)), Muscle Density (MuD [mgcm3]), Muscle Area (MuA [cm2]), Subcutaneous Fat Area (ScFA [cm2]), Cortical Density (CoD [mgcm3]), Cortical Area (CoD [mm2]), cortical concentric ring volumetric densities, Functional Muscle Bone Unit Index (FMBU: (SSI/bone length)) and Robustness Index (SSI/bone length^3), group and sex differences were examined.

Outcome and Results

The main finding was a significant sex-x-group interaction for Tibial FMBU (p = .021), Radial MuD (p = .036), and radial ScFA (p = .002). Boys with LMC/DCD had lower tibial FMBU scores, radial MuD and higher ScFA than the typically developing age-matched sample.

Conclusion and Implications

Comparisons of bone measures with Australian comparative data are similar to European findings however sex differences were found in the present study. Australian adolescent boys with LMC/DCD had less robust bones compared to their well-coordinated Australian peers, whereas there were no differences between groups for girls. These differences may be due to lower levels of habitual weight–bearing physical activity, which may be more distinct in adolescent boys with LMC/DCD compared to girls.

Section snippets

What this paper adds?

Little is known about the bone health of adolescents with LMC/DCD. Previously the authors have shown that bone health deficits are present when compared to European normative data. This study further explored these bone health differences in the Australian context, comparing Australian adolescents with LMC/DCD to typically developing age-matched Australian adolescents. The results revealed Australian adolescent boys with LMC/DCD had less robust bones compared to non-affected Australian peers,

Materials and methods

This study conducted a re-analysis of a published dataset from AMPitup (Hands et al., 2015) (described below) which used previously standardised bone data to the reference database (Moyer-Mileur, Quick, & Murray, 2008; Neu, Manz, Rauch, Merkel, & Schoenau, 2001) and included any new participants enrolled during 2015-2017. This study examines the raw bone data prior to standardization (as per 2.4 below). The typically developing cohort was drawn from data from the Griffith University Bone

Results

Participants with LMC/DCD were on average one year younger (14.4 ± 1.3 years) than the comparison group (15.3 ± 1.8 years) (p = .007), although this was not statistically significant when analysed according to sex (boys: p = .102; girls: p = .096), with both equally represented for the radius (54.1% male, 43.9% female) and tibia measures (53.2% male, 46.8% female). There were no significant differences between the LMC/DCD group and comparison group for tibial bone length (p = .446) and forearm

Discussion

The aim of the current study was to examine whether there were bone health differences in Australian adolescents with LMC/DCD when compared to typically developing age-matched Australian adolescents using pQCT data. Differences in bone parameters between Australian adolescents with LMC/DCD versus typically developing age-matched Australian adolescents described in this paper were similar to European normed between-group comparisons (Hands et al., 2015). New analyses based on sex revealed that

Conclusions

Comparisons of bone measures from adolescents with LMC/DCD with Australian comparative data are similar to European norm results revealing poorer bone health outcomes. However sex differences were found between boys and girls with LMC/DCD in the present study. Australian adolescent boys with LMC/DCD had less robust bones compared to Australian comparative data, whereas there were no between-group differences for girls. The mechanism which may explain these differences is not understood, but may

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Government’s Collaborative Research Network (CRN) program and the WA Department of Health FutureHealth WA First Year Initiatives – Mentoring Grant 2016. The AMPitup program was in part supported by a generous grant of the Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation. The funders had no involvement in study design; data collection, analysis and interpretation; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organisations within three years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the AMPitup adolescents and their families who took part in this study and Carlos Bervenotti and Tanya Blee from The University of Notre Dame Fremantle. Thanks extend to the staff of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at Princess Margaret Hospital for their expertise and support of the project, in particular Brendan Beeson, Drew Williams and Fiona Bettenay.

References (45)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5)

    (2013)
  • G.I. Baroncelli et al.
    (2005)
  • M.L. Bianchi et al.

    Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) on DXA evaluation in children and adolescents

    Pediatric Nephrology

    (2010)
  • J.P. Bonjour et al.

    Pubertal timing, bone acquisition, and risk of fracture throughout life

    Endocrine Reviews

    (2014)
  • K. Deere et al.

    A cross-sectional study of the relationship between cortical bone and high-impact activity in young adult males and females

    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

    (2012)
  • K. Deere et al.

    Habitual levels of high, but not moderate or low, impact activity are positively related to hip BMD and geometry: Results from a population-based study of adolescents

    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

    (2012)
  • R.K. Dishman et al.

    The determinants of physical activity and exercise

    Public Health Reports

    (1985)
  • J.N. Farr

    Associations of physical activity duration, frequency, and load with volumetric BMD, geometry, and bone strength in young girls

    Osteoporosis International

    (2011)
  • A. Fonseca et al.

    Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to assess bone health in children, adolescents, and young adults: A review of normative data

    Journal of Pediatric Hematology Oncology

    (2013)
  • J. Fritz et al.

    Influence of a school-based physical activity intervention on cortical bone mass distribution: A 7-year intervention study

    Calcified Tissue International

    (2016)
  • R.K. Fuchs et al.

    Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: A randomized controlled trial

    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

    (2001)
  • B. Hands et al.

    Physical fitness differences in children with and without motor learning difficulties

    European Journal of Special Needs Education

    (2006)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Association of developmental coordination disorder and low motor competence with impaired bone health: A systematic review

      2022, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ten studies were excluded in this manner, details of which are in Appendix C. Two sets of papers and conference publications were considered as potentially from the same cohort based on author, population, and ethics details. The first set (Cohort 1) (Chivers et al., 2019; Hands et al., 2015; Jenkins et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2020) was known to be of the same study cohort as PC and JT were authors. For the other paediatric cohort (Cohort 2) (Fong et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2018; Yam & Fong, 2017) considered likely to be a shared cohort attempts to contact the author via email were unsuccessful, as the account was closed.

    • Biomechanics of immature human cortical bone: A systematic review

      2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moyer-Mileur et al. (2008) determined the cortical area of the tibial diaphysis to range from 96.6 to 346.2 mm2 in children 5–18 years. The largest value reported in Moyer-Mileur et al. (2008) (346.2 mm2) is smaller than the largest value reported in Chivers et al. (2019) (418.9 mm2). Sládek et al. (2019) measured a cortical area of 79.9–159.7 mm2 in maturing tibiae, age 7–12 years.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text