Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study
Introduction
Construction waste generation has been identified as a major issue due to its direct impacts on the environment as well as the efficiency of the construction industry (Formoso et al., 2002). A study conducted by Ameh and Daniel (2013) found that on average 21–30% of cost overruns occurred in construction projects due to material wastage. Similarly, a low priority is assigned to construction waste management and often few resources and incentives are made available to facilitate waste management (WM) processes (Osmani et al., 2008, Teo and Loosemore, 2001). As a result of waste generation, contractors have to bear loss of profit due to the involvement of additional overhead costs and delays; loss of productivity due to additional time involvement for cleaning (Skoyles and Skoyles, 1987); and considerable waste disposal costs (Lingard et al., 2000). Similarly the responsibility for waste generation is often passed to subcontractors who have to estimate the amount of cost and time associated with waste generation during bidding (Johnston and Mincks, 1995). However, Guthrie et al. (1995) stressed that it is also a burden to the client, since the client ultimately has to bear the cost associated with WM. Manowong (2012) found that clients perceived construction WM as less important than profit maximisation and viewed WM as an activity which contributes strongly to project expenses. Since profit maximisation is the main objective of organisations, they are reluctant to adopt environmentally friendly measures towards WM unless they are profitable (Hao et al., 2008). Johnston and Mincks (1995) argued that a false assumption exists among construction practitioners that time spent in managing construction waste is a loss of productivity and pointed out that the construction industry should consider WM as a profitable venture. Construction waste generation not only has cost implications for handling processes but also consumes valuable land due to disposal activities (Hao et al., 2008). Furthermore, the industry cannot continue to practice if the environmental resources on which it depends are depleted. Thus, the significance of WM needs to be understood in order to encourage stakeholders to achieve goals related to WM (Manowong, 2012). However, the quantity of waste generation varies from country to country depending on the economic and cultural characteristics of a country, definitions used to categorise waste and data recording methods (Kourmpanis et al., 2008). Similarly, the effective implementation of WM plans is influenced by the compatibility of WM plans with the actual situation (Manowong, 2012). There is lack of comprehensive research to explore solutions for construction waste generation in Australia. This research aims to explore effective approaches to eliminate and/or minimise waste generation in construction projects in Australia. Findings of this study provide useful inputs for decision making processes around construction WM.
Section snippets
Literature review
By implementing proper WM practices, the construction industry can gain economic, quality and sustainability benefits (Kulatunga et al., 2006). Lingard et al. (1997) have argued that contractors can reduce the cost of construction by implementing WM plans. Construction WM plans help to achieve such cost benefits due to: cost reduction in material purchasing (Bossink and Brouwers, 1996, Coventry and Guthrie, 1998, Jaillon et al., 2009), transportation costs of materials and waste (Coventry and
Research methodology
Mixed methods from multiple sources provide research rigidity (Sekaran, 2003) which allows researchers to overcome the inherent weaknesses associated with each method (Dawson, 2009). Therefore, mixed methods were adopted in this research by combining qualitative and quantitative research approaches to identify ways of improving WM practices in non-residential building projects as shown in Fig. 1.
Findings of interviews
Results of the interviews were generally in line with the findings of the literature review and additional solutions were identified as shown in Table 2. Interviewees highlighted the importance of addressing both technical and human aspects of solutions for WM to improve the performance of WM.
As shown in Table 2, seven new solutions for WM were identified from the interviews. The three most frequently nominated solutions were: training and education for all stakeholders; reinforce legislation
Conclusions
It is well recognised that construction waste has residual value and its generation can be avoided. The purpose of this study was to determine potential ways to eliminate and/or minimise waste generation in construction projects. Seven new solutions for WM were identified from the interviews and a total of twenty six solutions for WM were identified both from the literature review and interviews, which were tested in a questionnaire survey. The exploratory factor analysis showed a total of five
Acknowledgements
The research project referred to in this paper is supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage grant and the following partners: Zero Waste SA; Australian Institute of Building Surveyors; Australian Institute of Building; Campbelltown City Council; Hodgkinson Architects; Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors; Shenzhen Jianyi International Engineering Consultants Ltd; Shenzhen University and the University of Karlsruhe.
References (68)
- et al.
Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2009) - et al.
Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong
Waste Manag.
(2009) - et al.
Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2010) - et al.
Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design
Waste Manag.
(2008) - et al.
Best practice measures assessment for construction and demolition waste management in building constructions
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2013) - et al.
Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: a China study
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2010) - et al.
Impact of construction waste disposal charging scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong
Waste Manag.
(2013) - et al.
Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management
Waste Manag.
(2011) The impact of the organisational structure and project organisational culture on project performance in Slovenian enterprises
J. Contemp. Manag. Issues
(2011)- et al.
The Survey Research Handbook
(2004)