Elsevier

Physical Therapy in Sport

Volume 30, March 2018, Pages 8-13
Physical Therapy in Sport

The prevalence and impact of low back pain in pre-professional and professional dancers: A prospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.10.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Prevalence of LBP in dancers is similar to those reported in other elite sport.

  • A high degree of variation exists between LBP experience and impact on participation.

  • Past history of LBP increases future risk.

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in pre-professional and professional dancers and its impact on dance participation, care-seeking and medication use.

Setting

One pre-professional ballet school, two pre-professional university dance programs, and a professional ballet company.

Participants

Male and female classical ballet and contemporary dancers.

Main outcome measures

An initial questionnaire collected demographic and LBP history data. The monthly prevalence of LBP (all episodes, activity limiting episodes and chronic LBP) and impact (activity limitation, care-seeking, and medication use) was collected over a nine-month period.

Results

119 dancers participated, which represented 54% of those invited. Activity limiting LBP was reported by 52% of dancers, while chronic LBP was reported by 24%. Seventeen percent of all episodes of LBP resulted in some form of dance activity being completely missed. One-third of the sample reported care-seeking and one-fifth of the sample used medication. A history of LBP was associated with activity limiting LBP (p < 0.01; adjusted odds ratio: 3.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.44, 11.00).

Conclusions

LBP in dancers was common and had multiple impacts. This study reinforces the need for dancer access to healthcare professionals with expertise in evidence-based LBP prevention and management.

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and represents significant personal and social cost (Maher, Underwood, & Buchbinder, 2017). It is often first experienced in childhood, with lifetime prevalence reaching adult levels by late adolescence (Calvo-Munoz, Gomez-Conesa, & Sanchez-Meca, 2013). Dance, which is a rigorous physical pursuit that boasts the highest participant rate for all cultural, sporting and leisure activities amongst Australian girls and the second highest for Australian male and female children combined (ABS, 2012), has been associated with a high prevalence of LBP (Crookshanks and Trotter, 1999, McMeeken et al., 2001, Swain et al., 2017). There is a strong rationale underlying this correlation. For instance, epidemiological evidence shows that engaging in work with high physical demands is a risk factor for the initial onset of LBP (Ferguson & Marras, 1997), while specific spine movements such as repetitive bending and twisting, which are integral to dance, are associated with increased reports of LBP as well as functional loss and spine injury (Ferguson and Marras, 1997, Marras et al., 2010).

Accordingly, epidemiological studies of dance injuries have identified the low back as the third most common site of injury in both pre-professional and professional classical ballet dancers (Allen et al., 2012, Ekegren et al., 2014), and the second most common site of chronic injury in Australian professional dancers (Crookshanks & Trotter, 1999). In adolescent ballet dancers, aged between 9 and 20, LBP history has been associated with future musculoskeletal injury (Gamboa, Roberts, Maring, & Fergus, 2008). Two previous LBP studies in dancers, both cross-sectional in design, have observed higher rates of LBP in dancers than controls (McMeeken et al., 2001), as well as lifetime and point prevalence rates surpassing those seen in global adolescent and adult populations (Swain et al., 2017). These findings endorse LBP as a common health issue in young, as well as professional dancers and, being well above that of the general population, warranting more attention.

Importantly, there is considerable variability in how LBP manifests in individuals (Menezes Costa et al., 2012), and simple measures of prevalence can only provide a partial overview of the problem. Little is currently known about the impact of LBP on dancers, as previous studies have focussed on how much LBP is experienced, rather than the extent to which it disrupts dance practice, or incites care-seeking and medication use. In addition, little is known about the factors associated with LBP in dance, which limits the capacity to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study had three aims: 1) to investigate, via prospective cohort design, the prevalence of LBP in pre-professional and professional dancers, 2) to determine the impact of LBP on dance participation, care-seeking and medication use, and 3) to determine factors associated with the experience of LBP.

Section snippets

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted over a nine-month period. Classical ballet dancers from a pre-professional ballet school (n = 95, aged 11–18), and a professional nationally touring ballet company (n = 29, age range unavailable) as well as contemporary dancers from two pre-professional university dance programmes (n = 77 and n = 19, aged 17–25) were invited to participate. Acceptance into each cohort is via an audition process, ensuring a threshold of ability. Volunteers were eligible

Results

Out of 220 individuals invited, 168 agreed to participate. The email addresses of three individuals were invalid, necessitating their exclusion from the study. Two individuals completed only the initial questionnaire and were excluded from the final analysis. The initial questionnaire as well as at least one subsequent monthly questionnaire was returned by 119 participants (54% of the sample invited, n = 100 females). Participant demographic data is presented in Table 1. Five hundred and

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of LBP in pre-professional and professional dancers. In this cohort, LBP was common. The proportion of dancers that experienced an episode of activity limiting LBP (52%) during the nine month study period was above the yearly prevalence observed in the global adolescent (34%)(Calvo-Munoz et al., 2013) and adult populations (38%) (Hoy et al., 2012), and within the yearly prevalence ranges observed in a systematic review of

Conclusion

Results from this study support the assertion that pre-professional and professional dancers are vulnerable to experiencing LBP and there is suggestion of a seasonal effect in this population. Low back pain history increases future risk, and for a significant portion of dancers, pain is ongoing, interferes with dance participation and provokes care-seeking and medication use. Accordingly, dance students and professionals need access to healthcare professionals with expertise in the management

Ethics statement

The authors confirm that the participants rights and confidentiality have been well protected in all aspects and they consented to the study described in the work. All relevant ethical safeguards have been met in relation to participant protection. Approval from the appropriate ethics committees have been obtained as indicated in the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank each dancer that took part in this study. We would also like to thank the Department of Education and Training, Victoria, as well as the teaching and health staff from each participating cohort. Additional thanks are directed to Bruce Cornell and Jan Gildea for providing comments on the manuscript.

References (36)

  • M.F. Bergeron et al.

    International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development

    British Journal of Sports Medicine

    (2015)
  • R. Cahalan et al.

    Inability to perform because of pain/injury in elite adult Irish dance: A prospective investigation of contributing factors

    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

    (2016)
  • I. Calvo-Munoz et al.

    Prevalence of low back pain in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis

    BMC Pediatrics

    (2013)
  • B. Clarsen et al.

    The oslo sports trauma research center questionnaire on health problems: A new approach to prospective monitoring of illness and injury in elite athletes

    British Journal of Sports Medicine

    (2014)
  • D. Crookshanks et al.

    Safe dance III: Report 1999: A report on the occurrence of injury in the Australian professional dance population

    (1999)
  • C.E. Dionne et al.

    A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2008)
  • C.L. Ekegren et al.

    Injury reporting via SMS text messaging in community sport

    Injury Prevention

    (2014)
  • J.M. Gamboa et al.

    Injury patterns in elite preprofessional ballet dancers and the utility of screening programs to identify risk characteristics

    Journal of Orthoppaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

    (2008)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Low-back pain in athletes

      2024, Journal de Traumatologie du Sport
    • Multi-segment spine range of motion in dancers with and without recent low back pain

      2019, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dancers are vulnerable to the experience of low back pain (LBP) [1]. The point prevalence of LBP is estimated to range between 8–25% in pre-professional and professional dancers, and in this population, LBP is associated with activity limitation, care-seeking, and medication use [2]. Although it is acknowledged that multiple factors contribute to LBP, recent evidence suggests that physical factors, such as posture and spinal range of movement (ROM), contribute to the experience of LBP [3,4].

    • Multi-segment spine kinematics: Relationship with dance training and low back pain

      2019, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, the cross-sectional nature of this study is unable to determine whether the small number of differences observed are caused by dance or merely reflect a selection bias within it. Second, this study was limited to a convenience sample of a well-trained, highly specialised population, for whom LBP is common [12,13], which limited the statistical power of the analysis and prevented subgrouping or adjustment for confounding. However, the 60 participants allowed a power of 0.86 to detect differences with a large effect between groups at an alpha level of 0.05, and, based on the observed effect sizes, a minimum sample of 368 participants would have been required to detect transverse plane ROM differences between dancers and non-dancers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text