Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 253, July 2017, Pages 233-239
Psychiatry Research

Predictors of using trains as a suicide method: Findings from Victoria, Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.057Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Persons who were single and those from areas with a high proportion of train commuters tended to use trains to suicide.

  • Suicides by train were similar to suicides by other means in many characteristics.

  • Prevention should combine efforts of limiting access to the railways with other individual- and community-level activities.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the choice of trains over other means of suicide. We performed a case-control study using data on all suicides in Victoria, Australia between 2009 and 2012. Cases were those who died by rail suicide and controls were those who died by suicide by any other means. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between the choice of trains and a range of individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors. Individuals who were never married had double odds of using trains compared to individuals who were married. Those from areas with a higher proportion of people who travel to work by train also had greater odds of dying by railway suicide compared to those from areas with a relatively lower proportion of people who travel to work by train. Prevention efforts should consider limiting access to the railways and other evidence-based suicide prevention activities.

Introduction

In Australia, hanging, poisoning by carbon monoxide, and poisoning by other substances are the most frequently used methods of suicide (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2014). However, there is variation in the choice of suicide method used across Australia's eight states and territories. For instance, Victoria has the largest proportion of suicides by jumping in front of a train, in the Northern Territory hanging is more common, and in Western Australia poisoning by carbon monoxide is particular prevalent. The current study focused on suicide by train in Victoria, which accounted for approximately 7% of all suicides in the state (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2014). This proportion was relatively moderate compared to the global proportion of suicide by train which range from 1% to 12% of all suicides (Krysinska and De Leo, 2008, Taylor et al., 2016).

Suicides by train are highly distressing for train drivers and witnesses (Bardon and Mishara, 2015). They can also cause economic losses through the disruption of train services, driver absenteeism, and counseling required for affected individuals (Lukaschek et al., 2011, Mehnert et al., 2012, Silla et al., 2012). Although suicides by train are a prominent problem within the railway sector, there is limited understanding of the factors associated with an individual's decision to use a train as a method of suicide (as opposed to other methods). One study interviewed railway suicide survivors and found that nearly half chose trains because they knew of someone else who used this method (O'Donnell et al., 1996). The same study found that some survivors also perceived this method as quick, highly lethal, easily accessible and/or widely available. Another study interviewed nine railway suicide survivors and found that the view that jumping in front of a train has a high chance of dying and easy access to trains were their main reasons for choosing trains (Chowdhury et al., 2000). This second point is consistent with a large body of work showing that suicide by particular means is closely linked with the availability of that means (Ajdacic-Gross et al., 2008, Thomas et al., 2011, Yip et al., 2012).

Previous studies comparing suicides by train with suicides by other means have shown, in general, that suicides by train do not differ from suicides by other means in terms of gender, mental health, adverse life events, and socioeconomic status (Emmerson and Cantor, 1993, Silla and Luoma, 2012). However, in one study, nearly 40% of those who died by rail suicide were found to have some kind of connection with rail (e.g. living close to a railway line, past experience trespassing on rail tracks); whereas, only 7% suicides by other means had that same relationship (Abbot et al., 2003). There is also evidence that people who died by rail suicide were younger than those who used other suicide means (Emmerson and Cantor, 1993, Silla and Luoma, 2012). Mental health inpatients were more likely to use trains while outpatients were more likely to poison themselves to end their own lives (Huisman et al., 2010). Existing literature on suicides by train showed that the majority of the victims were male, young, never married or single, unemployed or not in the labour force, and have been diagnosed with a mental illness and admitted for mental health care (Mishara, 2007, Ratnayake et al., 2007, Krysinska and De Leo, 2008, van Houwelingen and Kerkhof, 2008).

Beyond this much remains largely unknown about why some people choose trains over other methods of suicide. Based on the findings from previous research, we hypothesized that people who died of suicide by train would be different from those who died of suicide by other means on several factors. Those who died of suicide by train would be younger, never married or single, unemployed or not in the labour force, and have a history of mental illness and mental health hospitalisation. We also hypothesized that these people would have easier access to trains. It is less clear what the association would be for other factors.

Section snippets

Study setting and design

Victoria is the second largest state in Australia. It has a population of approximately 5.7 million people. Most Victorians live in Melbourne, the state's capital with a population of 4.1 million. Melbourne is serviced by a metropolitan railway network consisting of 16 railway lines with 230 railway stations. Seventy percent of people from Melbourne who travel to work by public transport use train services (Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economic, 2012). The railway tracks are

Demographic characteristics

During the study period, we identified 105 suicides by train (5%) and 1856 suicides by other methods (95%). Among suicides by train, 66% were by males and 34% by females, with a mean age of 37 years [standard deviation (SD) = 16 years]. Of those suicides by other methods, 77% were males and the mean age was 46 years (SD =18 years).

Factors associated with choice of method

In univariate analyses, the individual-level variables that were associated with the likelihood of choosing trains over other methods were age, sex and marital status

Main findings

We found that being never married was a key predictor of choosing trains over other suicide methods, while living in an area with high proportion of people who use train for commuting to work was an important neighbourhood factor associated with the choice of trains. Contrary to our hypothesis, age, sex, employment status, mental health-related variables, history of previous attempt, alcohol consumption, social and environmental variables, and other train-related variables (e.g. easy access to

Authors’ contributions

All authors participated in the design of the study. LST collected data with support from LB. LST performed the statistical analyses with input from MJS, AM and RM. LST prepared the first draft of the paper. All authors revised the draft and contributed to the final version of manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

This study received full ethical approval from the Health Sciences Human Ethics Committee (the University of Melbourne) and the Justice Human Research Ethics Committee (State Government Victoria).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Justice and Regulation for granting access to the National Coronial Information System, the Coroners Court of Victoria for cross-referencing railway suicide data, and Ms Nadia Polikarpowski (NCIS Coder at the Coroners Court of Victoria) for her assistance in data collection. We also thank the Victorian railway regulators and operators (from the Department of Transport, Planning & Local Infrastructure, Public Transport Victoria, Victrack, Metro

References (41)

  • V. Ajdacic-Gross et al.

    Methods of suicide: international suicide patterns derived from the WHO mortality database

    Bull. World Health Organ.

    (2008)
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics

    Information paper: external causes of death, data quality, 2005. Cat. no. 3317.0.55.001

    (2007)
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics

    Causes of death, Australia, 2012. Cat. no. 3303.0

    (2014)
  • C. Bardon et al.

    Systematic review of the impact of suicides and other critical incidents on railway personnel

    Suicide Life-Threat. Behav.

    (2015)
  • A. Barth et al.

    Socioeconomic factors and suicide: an analysis of 18 industrialized countries for the years 1983 through 2007

    J. Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2011)
  • A.L. Berman et al.

    Suicide on railroad rights-of-way: a psychological autopsy study

    Suicide Life-Threat. Behav.

    (2014)
  • C.C. Branas et al.

    Acute alcohol consumption, alcohol outlets, and gun suicide

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2011)
  • Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economic

    Understanding Australia's urban railways, research report 131

    (2012)
  • A.N. Chowdhury et al.

    Eco-psychiatry: suicidal behaviour at Calcutta metro rail: a prospective study

    Int. Med. J.

    (2000)
  • P. Congdon

    Assessing the impact of socioeconomic variables on small area variations in suicide outcomes in England

    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health

    (2013)
  • View full text