Cognitive, Behavioral, and Systems NeuroscienceResearch PaperChanges in corticomotor excitability and inhibition after exercise are influenced by hand dominance and motor demand
Highlights
▶Cortico-motor excitability and cortical inhibition were measured after hand tasks. ▶We compared motor demand (rate of movement) and hand (dominant vs. nondominant). ▶Excitability was reduced and cortical inhibition increased after all tasks. ▶The most demanding task had the least post-exercise effect, and vice-versa. ▶The effect of exercise on excitability and inhibition is inverse to motor demand.
Section snippets
Subjects
Ten healthy right-handed subjects (4F, 21–30 years of age) were recruited with the approval of the University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee and in conformity with the Declaration of Helsinki. Before the experiment, all subjects completed an Edinburgh Handedness Inventory assessment and provided written informed consent to partake in the study, which consisted of three testing sessions each lasting between 45 and 60 min. No subjects reported any discomfort or ill effects
Movement kinematics
Fig. 2 summarises the group mean data for movement rate and amplitude (START vs. END) for the MVR and SR tasks when performed with the DOM and NDOM hands. Statistical analysis revealed an effect for rate (F(3,72)=20.02, P<0.001; F(1,72)=4.56, P<0.05; TASK and TIME, respectively) but not amplitude. START rate for the MVR task was less for the NDOM compared with the DOM hand (5.8±0.22 Hz vs. 6.26±0.16 Hz; P<0.05), but no difference was found between the END rates for each hand (5.19±0.22 Hz vs.
Discussion
We have studied the changes in CME and SICI after a short 10-s period of cyclical finger movement in a 2×2 design comparing hand dominance and movement sustainability. For all hand-task combinations, we report a period of PED and increased SICI lasting for up to 8 min after task completion. We find that the least demanding task, one that involved index finger movement of the DOM hand at a submaximal rate, was associated with the greatest degree of PED and SICI increase, whereas the most
Conclusion
Our current findings show that undemanding motor tasks can be associated with relatively profound and lasting changes in CME and inhibition, which are in fact reduced with increasing task demand, such as maximum movement rate, or the use of the nonpreferred hand. Studies of CME after effortful exercise would benefit not only by comparison to baseline levels, but also to comparable and more sustainable exercise protocols. Such comparisons may reveal central processes in primary motor cortex,
Acknowledgments
We thank all of the participants in the study and Jonathan Green for designing and developing the data acquisition program in LabVIEW. W.P.T. was supported by a Scholarship for International Research Fees, University of Western Australia Postgraduate Award and the Enid and Arthur Home Memorial Scholarship. The authors also acknowledge support from the Neuromuscular Foundation and Muscular Dystrophy Association of Western Australia.
References (32)
- et al.
Human motor development and hand laterality: a kinematic analysis of drawing movements
Neurosci Lett
(2000) - et al.
Preference and performance measures of handedness
Brain Cogn
(2004) - et al.
Intracortical excitatory and inhibitory phenomena to paired transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy human subjects: differences between the right and left hemisphere
Neurosci Lett
(2000) - et al.
Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas
Clin Neurophysiol
(2000) Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(2002)- et al.
Differential magnetic resonance signal change in human sensorimotor cortex to finger movements of different rate of the dominant and subdominant hand
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res
(1998) - et al.
A parametric analysis of the “rate effect” in the sensorimotor cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis in human subjects
Neurosci Lett
(1998) - et al.
The relationship between handedness and fine motor performance
Cortex
(2001) - et al.
Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical applicationReport of an IFCN committee
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
(1994) - et al.
Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control
Neuroimage
(2004)
Predicting hand preference with performance on motor tasks
Cortex
Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation during unimanual motor tasks: further evidence for motor dominance
Clin Neurophysiol
Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion
Scand J Work Environ Health
Rapid modulation of human cortical motor outputs following ischaemic nerve block
Brain
Asymmetry of motor cortex excitability during a simple motor task: relationships with handedness and manual performance
Exp Brain Res
Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Cited by (25)
Hand dominance in the performance and perceptions of virtual reach control
2022, Acta PsychologicaSustained Maximal Voluntary Contractions Elicit Different Neurophysiological Responses in Upper- and Lower-Limb Muscles in Men
2019, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :All other participants were right-limb dominant for both limbs. Because literature has thus far reported inconsistent effects of limb dominance in regards to fatigability [e.g. Williams et al., 2002; Teo et al., 2012; Severijns et al., 2015] or parameters elicited by TMS [e.g. Livingston et al., 2010; Teo et al., 2012; Dharmadasa et al., 2019], the results were unlikely to be unaffected by one left-handed participant. Exclusion criteria for participation were injury to either the upper or lower limb during the previous six months, history of heart disease or hypertension and contraindications to TMS (Rossi et al., 2011).
Corticospinal excitability following repetitive voluntary movement
2018, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :The movement task used by Bonato et al. (1994, 1996) and Zanette et al. (1995) was a thumb adduction-abduction movement at a maximum voluntary frequency for 1 min [3,4,23]. Because the maximum frequency movement significantly attenuates movement frequency and range of motion within 20 s [17,20], it can be inferred that muscle fatigue has occurred after maximum frequency movement for 1 min [3,4,23]. Many studies reported that MEP decreased after a muscle fatigue task [11,13,18]; thus, the presence or absence of muscle fatigue may be involved in the difference in PED duration observed in this study and the previous studies by Bonato et al. (1994, 1996) and Zanette et al. (1995).
Post-exercise cortical depression following repetitive passive finger movement
2017, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :The corticospinal excitability temporarily declines after light repetitive voluntary movement, termed Post-exercise cortical depression (PED) [2–4,18,19,22]. During the PED period, spinal excitability does not change as evidence by stability of the F-wave amplitude [4,22], while inhibitory cortical circuit transmission increases as revealed by greater short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [18,19]. Therefore, it is thought that PED results from inhibition of excitability in primary motor cortex (M1).
Assessing vibratory stimulation-induced cortical activity during a motor task-A randomized clinical study
2015, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :Gabaminergic transmissions may have led to gradual synaptic transmission decrease, thus reducing the response to vibratory stimulation during the motor task [20]. The results from the present study are in agreement with those researches showing that the spindle afferent response capacity decreases after prolonged vibration, and is expressed by the somatosensory cortical electrophysiological behavior reduction, indicated by the P3 derivation [33,34]. Considering the C4 and P4 behavior, decrease was found in the control group, while increase was observed in the experimental group.