Review
Noninvasive stimulation of the temporoparietal junction: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We review all noninvasive stimulation studies modulating TPJ activity.

  • Methodological limitations, strengths and potential improvements are highlighted.

  • The existing and potential clinical applications of TPJ stimulation are explored.

  • Relevance to theoretical models of TPJ functional anatomy is discussed.

  • Alternative account unifying attention, self/other and mentalising processes posited.

Abstract

Imaging and lesion studies have suggested numerous roles for the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), for example in attention and neglect, social cognition, and self/other processing. These studies cannot establish causal relationships, and the importance and relevance of (and interrelationships between) proposed roles remain controversial. This review examined studies that use noninvasive transcranial stimulation (NTS) to explore TPJ function. Of the 459 studies identified, 40 met selection criteria. The strengths and weaknesses of NTS-relevant parameters used are discussed, and methodological improvements suggested. These include the need for careful selection of stimulation sites and experimental tasks, and use of neuronavigation and concurrent functional activity measures. Without such improvements, overlapping and discrete functions of the TPJ will be difficult to disentangle. Nevertheless, the contributions of these studies to theoretical models of TPJ function are discussed, and the clinical relevance of TPJ stimulation explored. Some evidence exists for TPJ stimulation in the treatment of auditory hallucinations, tinnitus, and depersonalisation disorder. Further examination of the TPJ in conditions such as autism spectrum disorder is also warranted.

Introduction

The temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is a critical multimodal cortical region, the precise role and anatomy of which remains controversial. Not only are its functional roles and anatomical boundaries debated, but its very conception as a unified region with a common function is uncertain. Though definitions vary, the TPJ generally refers to an area of cortex at the junction of the inferior parietal lobule, lateral occipital cortex, and the posterior superior temporal sulcus (Mars et al., 2012; Fig. 1). The TPJ receives inputs from thalamic, limbic, somatosensory, visual and auditory areas, and has bidirectional connectivity with distal temporal and prefrontal regions (Decety and Lamm, 2007). Due to this location at the confluence of diverse information streams, the TPJ is hypothesised to be a critical hub for multisensory integration and processing.

Traditionally, evidence regarding TPJ function has emerged from functional imaging and lesion studies. Functional imaging studies implicate the TPJ in processes as varied as episodic memory retrieval (Vilberg and Rugg, 2008, Wagner et al., 2005), temporal processing (Davis et al., 2009), language and speech (Binder et al., 2009), resting state activity (Buckner et al., 2008, Greicius et al., 2003), vestibular function (Ventre-Dominey, 2014), attention (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002) and social cognition (Dunbar, 2012, Van Overwalle, 2009). The latter two constructs have attracted the bulk of the research interest, particularly regarding areas of overlapping activity in and near the right TPJ (rTPJ). Earlier studies examining the rTPJ in attention emphasise its involvement in bottom-up attentional reorienting based on stimulus salience (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002, Decety and Lamm, 2007). Some later papers suggest a further role of the rTPJ in top-down attentional processes (Geng and Vossel, 2013, Vossel et al., 2014). The rTPJ has also been implicated in left hemifield neglect, which refers to a deficit in attention to the left side of space (Ptak and Schnider, 2011). Similarly, many studies of social cognition have identified TPJ activity during processes involving mentalising (Gallagher and Frith, 2003, Saxe and Kanwisher, 2003) and related constructs such as belief attribution (Young and Saxe, 2008), imitation and control thereof (Santiesteban et al., 2012b, Sowden and Catmur, 2013), and moral processing (Greene et al., 2004, Young and Saxe, 2009). Important mentalising processes occur in the TPJ bilaterally (Perner et al., 2006). There is also a strong body of literature connecting TPJ activity to self-other and bodily-awareness processing, such as sense of agency (Farrer et al., 2003, Farrer and Frith, 2002, Ruby and Decety, 2001), self-other discrimination (van der Meer et al., 2011, Vogeley et al., 2001), and embodiment (Arzy et al., 2006). Indeed, out-of-body experiences (OBEs) may be related to multisensory integration failure at the TPJ (Blanke and Arzy, 2005, Blanke et al., 2002). OBEs involve the perception of being outside one's own body, and often observing oneself from this perspective.

Lesion studies tend to paint a similar portrait in terms of deficits associated with TPJ damage. One challenge regarding synthesis and making inferences, however, is that damage is infrequently focal to the TPJ specifically, so functional contributions can be more difficult to pinpoint with confidence. Having noted this caveat, the lesion literature is particularly rich regarding TPJ involvement in attention and visual neglect (Committeri et al., 2007, Ticini, 2013). Damage to the rTPJ has long been associated with neglect symptoms (Di Pellegrino, 1995, Friedrich et al., 1998, Karnath et al., 2003, Vallar and Perani, 1986), although it is increasingly acknowledged that neglect is heterogeneous both behaviourally and anatomically (Karnath et al., 2004). Two recent activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses examining lesion-symptom mapping studies relevant to visual and spatial neglect affirm this diversity (Chechlacz et al., 2012, Molenberghs et al., 2012). Separate lesion sites were found to be divergently influential in different tasks, and damage to different regions within the TPJ itself had different implications. For example, more posterior lesions (including the angular gyrus) impacted allocentric function more greatly than in egocentric frames of reference, which were more heavily influenced by lesions to supramarginal and superior temporal gyri (Chechlacz et al., 2012). Regarding attention more generally, lesion evidence supports TPJ involvement in both top-down (Geng and Vossel, 2013) and bottom-up attention processes (Castiello and Paine, 2002, Corbetta et al., 2005, Posner et al., 1984). The lesion literature also supports the notion that the TPJ is critical to a range of other processes, including language and speech (Buchsbaum et al., 2011) and motor-sensory abilities such as perception-action coupling (Ro et al., 1998). Left TPJ damage has been associated with ideational apraxia (De Renzi and Lucchelli, 1988), and TPJ damage in general impacts a range of bodily-awareness and self-other processing abilities, such as vestibular function, internal body models and postural stability (Pérennou et al., 2000, Ventre-Dominey et al., 2003). It can also result in deficits such as anosognosia and personal neglect (Committeri et al., 2007, Starkstein et al., 1992) and contribute to the likelihood of OBEs (Blanke and Arzy, 2005). The self-other processing that occurs at the TPJ may also be critical in terms of higher order social cognitive processes. For example, one study examining 13 patients with TPJ lesions found imitative control and perspective-taking performance to be relatively impaired in a manner that was significantly correlated (Spengler et al., 2010). TPJ lesions have also been found to effect facial emotion recognition and emotional empathy (Shamay-Tsoory, 2011, Starkstein et al., 1992), as well as mentalising processes such as belief attribution (Samson et al., 2004).

There is significant debate as to whether the rTPJ primarily subserves attention, social cognition, or a co-dependent combination of both. Earlier papers tend to advocate the primacy of either attention (Mitchell, 2008) or social cognition (Saxe and Wexler, 2005), or attempt to explain overlapping function in terms of unified, co-dependent processes (Decety and Lamm, 2007). In the latter case, the TPJ is viewed as a critical hub in predicting external events and reorienting attention based on stimulus salience. According to Decety and Lamm (2007) these lower-level processes are important in a domain general way, but are also essential to higher order processes such as mentalising, which requires complex processes of ‘attending-to’ and ‘theorising-about’ social stimuli. More recently, a number of papers have applied more ‘fine-grained’ analyses and suggest that distinct neural regions may exist for different processes within the TPJ, which may or may not overlap in terms of functional integration (Carter and Huettel, 2013, Kubit and Jack, 2013, Mars et al., 2012, Scholz et al., 2009). On average, attention tasks elicit activity in more dorsal/anterior TPJ areas (Fig. 2), whereas social cognition tasks tend to activate more ventral/posterior TPJ sites (Carter and Huettel, 2013, Kubit and Jack, 2013). Furthermore, an examination of the rTPJ conducted by Mars et al. (2012) identified three subregions (using tractography-based parcellation), and then explored their resting state functional connectivity. They reported a dorsal cluster in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) with functional connectivity to the lateral anterior prefrontal cortex (laPFC), a ventral anterior TPJ cluster connected to the ventral PFC and anterior insula, and a posterior TPJ subregion that interacted with the anterior medial PFC, temporal pole, and posterior cingulate.

There are limitations to conclusions based on the findings above, however. First, findings in imaging studies are correlational. In a multimodal and finely parcellated region with various theorised ‘switching roles’ (where activity increases may be better explained by decreases in suppression) such as the TPJ, imaging has limited causal explanatory power (Kubit and Jack, 2013). Second, lesion and imaging studies cannot make the leap from identifying region-function relationships to exploring potential clinical and therapeutic implications and responses. Fortunately, noninvasive transcranial stimulation (NTS) techniques can overcome both of these limitations. As interest in the TPJ has grown over the last decade, so has the number of NTS studies exploring its function and clinical relevance.

The TPJ is emerging as a critical hub in numerous cognitive domains. The proliferation of NTS studies examining the TPJ has not been systematically reviewed to date. Doing so provides a unique opportunity to explore and better understand its causal roles, which remain controversial.

A further goal is to examine the potential clinical utility of NTS technologies as applied to the TPJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and/or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have already been used in populations with depersonalization disorders (Christopeit et al., 2014), tinnitus, and refractory auditory hallucinations, all with some success. Reviews and metaanalyses in these latter two conditions already exist (Slotema et al., 2014, Song et al., 2012), so only subsequent studies will be examined in detail here.

A particular focus will be whether studies stimulating the TPJ during social cognition tasks provide support for the potential efficacy of TPJ modulation in clinical populations such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied to other regions of the mentalising network, such as the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), has already shown potential benefits in terms of social-relating symptoms in ASD (Enticott et al., 2011, Enticott et al., 2014). Given the critical role of the TPJ in mentalising (Aichhorn et al., 2009, Saxe and Wexler, 2005), TPJ atypicalities in ASD (Kana et al., 2014), and the link between aberrant TPJ function during mentalising tasks and social impairment in ASD (Lombardo et al., 2011), the TPJ appears to be an ideal candidate region for exploration of modulation in ASD. Furthermore, effective stimulation of the TPJ can occur at a lower intensity than dmPFC stimulation (due to its depth), and is likely to be less aversive.

A secondary goal is to briefly examine the various methodologies used, in order to highlight shortfalls and suggest potential improvements for future research exploring TPJ function. The review will begin with a general discussion of the stimulation technologies used, and trends in terms strengths and weaknesses of the stimulation-relevant parameters utilised. It will then examine the studies themselves, grouped according to behavioural function or clinical group examined.

Section snippets

Methods

Databases were searched in April 2014 using the following search string, without limiters: [(TMS OR “transcranial magnetic stimulation” OR rTMS OR “repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation” OR tDCS OR “transcranial direct current stimulation” OR tACS OR “transcranial alternating current stimulation” OR TBS OR “theta burst stimulation” OR “theta-burst-stimulation” OR “theta-burst stimulation” OR “non-invasive brain stimulation” OR “noninvasive brain stimulation” OR tPCS OR “transcranial

Stimulation techniques

Of the papers reviewed, 11 used event-related TMS pulses (erTMS; eight used single pulse, three used double pulse, and one used a triple pulse protocol), 23 used rTMS, four used theta burst stimulation (TBS), and five used tDCS. Some studies utilised more than one stimulation technique.

The different techniques are informative regarding study goals. To briefly disrupt neural activity in a focal target region during a specific stage of task performance, ‘online’ erTMS pulses are generally used.

Conclusion

Although the broad range of goals and methodologies in the studies reviewed here resist a straightforward synthesis, several important themes emerge. Regarding methodology, it is encouraging to observe the diverse and creative range of techniques employed to probe or harness TPJ functionality. However, some common limitations hamper progress in terms of delineating the specific roles of the TPJ, functional streams within the TPJ, its broader functional connectivity, and appropriateness of

Acknowledgement

Peter Enticott is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) (GNT1052073).

References (158)

  • M. Christopeit et al.

    Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on specific symptom clusters in depersonalization disorder (DPD)

    Brain Stimul.

    (2014)
  • M. Demeulemeester et al.

    What is the real effect of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on hallucinations? Controlling for publication bias in neuromodulation trials

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • G. Di Pellegrino

    Clock-drawing in a case of left visuo-spatial neglect: a deficit of disengagement?

    Neuropsychologia

    (1995)
  • R.I.M. Dunbar

    The social brain meets neuroimaging

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2012)
  • P.G. Enticott et al.

    A double-blind, randomised trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder

    Brain Stimul.

    (2014)
  • C. Farrer et al.

    Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • C. Farrer et al.

    Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • P.B. Fitzgerald et al.

    A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2006)
  • H.L. Gallagher et al.

    Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.J. Geng et al.

    Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: contextual updating?

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2013)
  • A. Giardina et al.

    Temporo-parietal junction is involved in attribution of hostile intentionality in social interactions: an rTMS study

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2011)
  • J.D. Greene et al.

    The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment

    Neuron

    (2004)
  • M. Hallett

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • U. Herwig et al.

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation in therapy studies: examination of the reliability of “standard” coil positioning by neuronavigation

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    The theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2011)
  • E.-L. Jay et al.

    Testing a neurobiological model of depersonalization disorder using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Brain Stimul.

    (2014)
  • V. Jurcak et al.

    10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems

    Neuroimage

    (2007)
  • C. Kobayashi et al.

    Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’ in American and Japanese children

    Brain Res.

    (2007)
  • B. Langguth et al.

    Controversy: does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation show efficacy in treating tinnitus patients?

    Brain Stimul.

    (2008)
  • P.A. Lewis et al.

    Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • M.V. Lombardo et al.

    Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • A. Londero et al.

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a new therapeutic approach in subjective tinnitus?

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2006)
  • A. Mantovani et al.

    Temporo-parietal junction stimulation in the treatment of depersonalization disorder

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2011)
  • I.G. Meister et al.

    Hemiextinction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right temporo-parietal junction

    Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • T. Murakami et al.

    Effective connectivity hierarchically links temporoparietal and frontal areas of the auditory dorsal stream with the motor cortex lip area during speech perception

    Brain Lang.

    (2012)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008

    Brain Stimul.

    (2008)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • S.M. Agarwal et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia

    Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • M. Aichhorn et al.

    Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: falseness, beliefs, or attention

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • C. Andrade

    Transcranial direct current stimulation for refractory auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • S. Arzy et al.

    Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area

    J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • T. Baumgartner et al.

    Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • J.R. Binder et al.

    Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2009)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    The out-of-body experience: disturbed self-processing at the temporo-parietal junction

    Neuroscientist

    (2005)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction

    J. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions

    Nature

    (2002)
  • S. Borchers et al.

    Direct electrical stimulation of human cortex—the gold standard for mapping brain functions?

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • G. Bosco et al.

    Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    J. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • J. Brunelin et al.

    Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • Cited by (89)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text