Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 76, May 2019, Pages 178-190
Nurse Education Today

Adverse health events associated with clinical placement: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Clinical placement is a fundamental aspect of student learning and skill development across healthcare disciplines. However, participation in clinical placements can also present significant risk to students. This systematic literature review sought to examine the range of risks and hazards encountered by students across healthcare disciplines during their clinical placements.

Design

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines were utilised in conducting this exploratory systematic review.

Data sources

The CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete, and PsycINFO databases were searched. Reference lists of eligible records obtained via database searching were screened, and a supplementary key author search was conducted. Research published between 2013 and 2018 and conducted in the context of comparative international healthcare systems was the focus of this study.

Review methods

Study titles and abstracts were screened, and the full text of potentially relevant records was perused. Records meeting key eligibility criteria by addressing risk posed to students in healthcare disciplines within a clinical placement context were included in the final synthesis.

Results

The search identified 46 eligible records. The literature highlighted the worrying trend that students, most notably in the nursing discipline, can be exposed to a wide range of risks and adverse health events during clinical placement.

Conclusions

As risks in unpredictable clinical environments cannot be eradicated, this review demonstrated a critical need for educative action to enable students to competently and confidently manage risks, and to reduce occurrence of adverse health events.

Introduction

Students across healthcare participate in clinical placement, often as a compulsory element of their professional training. Clinical placement is widely acknowledged as a fundamental aspect of learning and professional development for students undertaking tertiary education in a healthcare discipline. Placement enables students to integrate theoretical knowledge with clinical practice and to develop skills and competencies in an applied context (Levett-Jones et al., 2006; Yiend et al., 2016). During clinical placement, students are introduced to the professional practices, values, and ethics of their field, scaffolding their future work as a healthcare clinician (Yiend et al., 2016). Formative clinical experiences can also impact long-term career aspirations (Boyd-Turner et al., 2016; McCall et al., 2009).

Simultaneously, the myriad of challenges associated with clinical placement across international healthcare are increasingly being acknowledged (Taylor et al., 2017; Department of Health and Human Services, 2017; Driver, 2013; McBride et al., 2015; Council of Ontario Universities, 2013; Smith et al., 2016). In addition to organisational challenges, such as a paucity of appropriate placements and supervisors, and restricted learning opportunities (Scott et al., 2011; Healthcare Management Advisors, 2014), clinical placement presents a range of risks to students across the healthcare industry (Department of Health, 2011; Taylor et al., 2017). Notably, preliminary research has indicated that students can be directly exposed to violence, sexual harassment, and verbal abuse whilst on placement (Sheen et al., 2012; McManamny et al., 2013). These findings indicate a need for increased emphasis on risk management strategies to protect students within clinical placement contexts.

The literature examining risks to students on clinical placement is complex. Healthcare training and education operates within rapidly changing landscapes. A broad array of placement-related issues has been explored from multiple perspectives (i.e. universities, placement providers, supervisors, clinical staff, and students) and across many healthcare disciplines. Clarity around this topic is also marred by differing terminologies used across research to describe the concepts of ‘clinical placement’, ‘supervision’, and ‘risk’. To the authors' knowledge, systematic review of research examining the risks faced by students completing clinical placement, has not yet been undertaken. Given the importance of assuring student safety and competency, clinical placement stakeholders would benefit from a clear conceptualisation of key challenges presented to students during their training. This would enable the development of training models designed to equip students to competently and confidently manage any risks presenting during placement. As a first step, a research review is needed to explore and summarise the breadth of placement problems, hazards, and risks raised in the literature.

The objective of the current study was to address this gap in the literature by exploring the range of risks and hazards encountered by students across healthcare disciplines during clinical placement. To best capture placement-related risks arising in the current educational climate, all literature published from 2013 and onwards was examined.

Section snippets

Data sources

The CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete, and PsycINFO databases were searched. Search terms, searched within abstracts, included: (AB(“health” OR “health care” OR “healthcare”)) AND (AB(“student*” OR “trainee*”)) AND (AB(“clinical placement*” OR “clinical practical*” OR “clinical practicum” OR “clinical practice placement*” OR “clinical fieldwork” OR “clinical rotation”)) AND (AB(risk* OR “occupational health and safety” OR “occupational risk*” OR “adverse health event*” OR “occupational safety”

Results

The search yielded a total of 50 records for inclusion in the review. Of these, eight records were located via reference list searching, and twelve records were found via key author search. The step-by-step process determining the inclusion of articles is illustrated within the PRISMA flowchart depicted in Fig. 1. Appendix A details the reasons for exclusion of papers from the review.

Discussion

The 46 studies included in this review highlighted that students across a spectrum of healthcare disciplines, including nursing, medicine, paramedicine, and midwifery, contend with demonstrable risks within the clinical placement milieu. Whilst the literature showed that students can be directly exposed to harm (e.g. physical injury, abuse, bullying), most studies examined the risks indirectly posed to students during clinical placement. Indirect risks included placement shortages, limited

Conclusion

This review enunciated the broad range of risks to students undertaking clinical placement. The literature conclusively showed that students are exposed to risk, and further, can experience adverse health events of diverse and potentially harmful nature. Unfortunately, elimination of clinical risk is all but impossible. Therefore, the responsibility to prepare students for unpredictable clinical environments, reduce the occurrence of adverse health events, and empower students to voice concerns

Declarations of interest

None.

References (86)

  • C. Hamshire et al.

    Should I stay or should I go? A study exploring why healthcare students consider leaving their program

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2013)
  • M.F. Kelton

    Clinical coaching - an innovative role to improve marginal nursing students' clinical practice

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2014)
  • J. Koch et al.

    Is there a relationship between the diversity characteristics of nursing students and their clinical placement experiences? A literature review

    Collegian

    (2015)
  • S. Lamont et al.

    Satisfaction with clinical placement – the perspective of nursing students from multiple universities

    Collegian

    (2015)
  • T. Levett-Jones et al.

    Belongingness: a prerequisite for nursing students' clinical learning

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2008)
  • L. McCall et al.

    Influence of clinical placement on undergraduate midwifery students' career intentions

    Midwifery

    (2009)
  • L. McKenna et al.

    Midwifery student exposure to workplace violence in clinical settings: an exploratory study

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2016)
  • C. Patterson et al.

    Nursing students' reflections on the learning experience of a unique mental health clinical placement

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2016)
  • Y. Salamonson et al.

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2015)
  • M. Seibel

    For us or against us? Perceptions of faculty bullying of students during undergraduate nursing education clinical experiences

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2014)
  • G. Stacey et al.

    The rules of the game in graduate entry nursing: a longitudinal case study

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2016)
  • A. Steven et al.

    Patient safety in nursing education: contexts, tensions, and feeling safe to learn

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2014)
  • B. Stubbs et al.

    Physiotherapy students' experiences of bullying on clinical internships: an exploratory study

    Physiotherapy

    (2013)
  • S. Tee et al.

    Workplace violence experienced by nursing students: a UK survey

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2016)
  • T.F. van de Mortel et al.

    Student nurses' perceptions of clinical placements in Australian Prison Health Services: a mixed methods study

    Nurse Educ. Pract.

    (2017)
  • L. Walker et al.

    Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Australian medical students towards influenza vaccination

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • D.J. Ward

    The barriers and motivators to learning infection control in clinical placements: interviews with midwifery students

    Nurse Educ. Today

    (2013)
  • M. Birks et al.

    A ‘rite of passage?’: bullying experiences of nursing students in Australia

    Collegian

    (2017)
  • I.T. Bjørk et al.

    Nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment in placements outside traditional hospital settings

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2014)
  • E.P. Blakey et al.

    Student nurses' competence in sexual health care: a literature review

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2017)
  • M. Boyle et al.

    Paramedic and midwifery student exposure to workplace violence during clinical placements in Australia - a pilot study

    Int. J. Med. Educ.

    (2016)
  • C. Bradbury-Jones

    Talking about domestic abuse: crucial conversations for health visitors

    Community Pract.

    (2015)
  • C. Bradbury-Jones et al.

    Are we failing to prepare nursing and midwifery students to deal with domestic abuse? Findings from a qualitative study

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2015)
  • W.M. Chernomas et al.

    Stress, depression, and anxiety among undergraduate nursing students

    Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh.

    (2013)
  • P. Clarke

    Student nursing on placement – collaborators or challengers

    J. Adult Protect.

    (2015)
  • A.F. Cook et al.

    The prevalence of medical student mistreatment and its association with burnout

    Acad. Med.

    (2014)
  • Council of Ontario Universities

    Integrating Clinical Education Into Ontario's Changing Health Care System

  • J.G. Crossley et al.

    Student assistantships: bridging the gap between student and doctor

    Adv. Med. Educ. Pract.

    (2015)
  • M. Daly et al.

    What factors in rural and remote extended clinical placements may contribute to preparedness for practice from the perspective of students and clinicians?

    Med. Teach.

    (2013)
  • R. Davenport et al.

    Struggle and failure on clinical placement: a critical narrative review

    Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord.

    (2017)
  • Department of Health

    Victoria's strategic plan for clinical placements 2012–2015: Well placed. Well prepared

  • Department of Health and Human Services

    Standardised student induction protocol

  • C. Driver

    Health risks for students on overseas placements

    Nurs. Times

    (2013)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Adverse events encountered during clinical placements by undergraduate nursing students in Spain

      2020, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main adverse events (AEs) that have been identified are adverse drug reactions, thromboembolism, vascular and urinary catheter infections, decubitus ulcers, nosocomial pneumonia and falls (Jha et al., 2013). Systems for reporting incidents and AEs have been developed to address this challenge, and important efforts are being made to promote a safety-oriented culture within health organisations, with interventions such as hand-washing programmes, the safe identification of patients and the use of checklists (Graj et al., 2019; Rocco and Garrido, 2017). Moreover, care providers play an essential role in clinical safety, so that, aspects such as the nurse-patient ratio and the nurses' skill mix have been identified as essential elements in preventing AEs (Aiken et al., 2014; Ball et al., 2018).

    • Understanding the risks in work-integrated learning

      2021, International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching [ID16-5270]. The views expressed in this project do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching was not involved in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the study.

    View full text