Elsevier

Materials Science and Engineering: A

Volume 648, 11 November 2015, Pages 265-273
Materials Science and Engineering: A

Constitutive analysis of hot deformation behavior of a Ti6Al4V alloy using physical based model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.055Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of deformation parameters on the flow behavior of a Ti6Al4V alloy has been studied to understand the deformation mechanisms during hot compression. Cylindrical samples with partially equiaxed grains were deformed in the α+β phase region at different thermo-mechanical conditions. To develop components with tailored properties, the physically based Estrin and Mecking (EM) model for the work hardening/dynamic recovery combined with the Avrami equation for dynamic recrystallization was used to predict the flow stress at varying process conditions. The EM model revealed good predictability up to the peak strain, however, at strain rates below 0.01 s−1, a higher B value was observed due to the reduced density of dislocation tangles. In contrast, the flow softening model revealed higher value of constants a and b at high strain rates due to the reduction in the volume fraction of dynamic recrystallization and larger peak strain. The predicted flow stress using the combined EM+Avrami model revealed good agreement with the measured flow stress resulted in very low average absolute relative error value. The microstructural analysis of the samples suggests the formation of coarse equiaxed grains together with the increased β phase fraction at low strain rate leads to a higher flow softening.

Introduction

The hot deformation of Ti6Al4V alloy is considered as one of the most difficult processes due to its narrow processing window of time and temperature, to produce components with controlled microstructure and improved mechanical properties [1], [2]. Extensive research has already been carried out to understand Ti6Al4V alloy deformation behavior for different initial microstructures and processing conditions [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Studies have shown that the initial microstructure, significantly affects the flow behavior, and deformation temperature and deformation rate control the flow behavior and the final properties of the alloy. Further, the high diffusion coefficient of bcc β phase at high temperature single phase region (i.e. β) leads to better ductility and ease of deformation than the two phase region (i.e. α+β), where the combination of hcp α and bcc β makes the processing more difficult [10]. Though the processing is relatively difficult in the α+β phase region, a good combination of strength and toughness is obtained during the α+β phase deformation than the β phase. Therefore, it is essential to elucidate the deformation behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy in the α+β phase to improve the mechanical properties of components.

The hot deformation behavior usually consisted of the work hardening during the initial stage up to the peak strain and the flow characteristics beyond the peak strain. Multiple approaches are available to predict the flow behavior under multiple deformation conditions. The evolution of constitutive equations, where the instantaneous stress can be calculated as a function of deformation parameter and material property, are widely used [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. This can be classified into two groups, namely i) empirical and ii) physical models. The empirical models are straight forward, where only some material constants are involved without physical meaning. On the other hand, the physical models constitute the micro-mechanisms involved during deformation [16]. A few studies employed semi empirical and artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict the flow stress of Ti6Al4V [13], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Limited attempts have been made, to the authors' knowledge, to predict the flow behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy through a physical approach because of the material's heterogeneous deformation behavior and complex microstructural evolution. The physical based internal state variable (ISV) approach, which relates the material properties to its microstructural and deformation mechanism, is used to predict the flow behavior for each individual phase of Ti6Al4V [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. However, a combined approach to predict the work hardening/dynamic recovery up to the peak strain and the flow softening behavior beyond the peak strain has not yet been developed for Ti6Al4V alloy.

In this work, a physically based EM model [26], which predicts the work hardening/dynamic recovery behavior, and the Avrami equation to predict the flow softening due to dynamic recrystallization [27] were considered. Thus, the combined EM+Avrami model was used to predict the flow stress in the initial stages of deformation and beyond the peak strain during hot deformation of Ti6Al4V alloy in the α+β phase region. The flow behavior analysis and the microstructural evolution were carried out to understand the thermo-mechanical behavior. The model constants were identified for varying hot deformation conditions in the α+β phase region. Finally, the predicted flow stresses were compared with the measured flow stress to analyze the accuracy of the developed model.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

In the present study, a Ti6Al4V alloy was used with a composition of 6.44% Al, 4.0% V, 0.15% Fe, 0.017% C, 0.18% O, 0.005% N (in wt%), received from TIMET in the form of rolled plate in mill annealed condition. The as-received microstructure consisted of partially equiaxed and deformed alpha grains with fine-equiaxed beta phase dispersed throughout the structure (Fig. 1). The intergranular beta phase volume fraction was ~5.3%. The beta transus temperature of this alloy was ~995 °C.

Isothermal hot

Results

The flow behavior of each Ti6Al4V sample with a complex initial microstructure was analyzed at different thermomechanical conditions. The microstructural mechanisms during deformation were related to the initial microstructure and the deformation conditions. The raw data were used to calculate the flow stress at different deformation conditions. The friction correction was applied to the flow stress to avoid the effect of friction, due to sample and tool interaction during deformation using

Work hardening behavior

The flow curve analysis and the microstructural evolution revealed that the samples exhibit work hardening at an initial stage of deformation and then flow softening appears beyond the peak strain. The deformation mechanisms dominated by slip dislocations, which results in a rapid augment in the dislocation density with an increase in the plastic deformation (i.e. work hardening). Studies on the dislocation behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy suggests that the deformation mechanism is dominated by the

Conclusions

The work hardening and the flow softening behavior of the Ti6Al4V alloy during hot deformation were modeled using the combined EM+Avrami approach. The work hardening rate of Ti6Al4V alloy was varied depending on the rate of dislocation storage and annihilation. At higher strain rate, the increased population of subgrain boundaries resulted in larger peak strain values. The dynamic recovery model revealed good accuracy up to the peak strain, whereas at strain rates below 0.01 s−1, a higher B

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of TIMET (US) in providing the Ti6Al4V alloy required for the present study. The authors also thank the Australian Research Council and Bharat Forge Ltd., for the funding and support provided to carry out this research.

References (44)

  • T. Seshacharyulu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2000)
  • T. Seshacharyulu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2000)
  • T. Seshacharyulu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • W.-S. Lee et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (1997)
  • R. Ding et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • X. He et al.

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.H. Kim et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • S. Seo et al.

    Int. J. Impact Eng.

    (2005)
  • Y. Estrin

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (1998)
  • L.X. Kong et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (1999)
  • J. Cai et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2011)
  • J. Xiao et al.

    J. Alloy. Compd.

    (2012)
  • N.S. Reddy et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • P.D. Hodgson et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (1999)
  • X.G. Fan et al.

    Int. J. Plast.

    (2011)
  • R.C. Picu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • J. Luo et al.

    Mech. Mater.

    (2010)
  • P. Vo et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2007)
  • Y. Estrin et al.

    Acta Metall.

    (1984)
  • Y.C. Lin et al.

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2010)
  • S.L. Semiatin et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1999)
  • M. Jain et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text