Investigating implementation issues for workload control (WLC): A comparative case study analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Workload control (WLC) is a method of production planning and control, which when commenced at the customer enquiry stage, has particular relevance to producers of highly customised products. Although previous research has suggested that WLC has great potential to improve performance, only a few successful case studies have been reported. To facilitate more widespread use of WLC, this paper seeks to investigate issues that arise from implementing WLC systems through a rare comparative case study analysis. Two companies are studied, a capital goods manufacturer and a precision engineering sub-contractor. The study initially identifies emerging research questions that address 17 implementation issues, including those related to the market/customer, the primary manufacturing process, the WLC system requirements, the flow of information and embedding WLC within the organisation. For each implementation issue, an appropriate response is given that leads to changes in the theory underpinning WLC or the development of WLC implementation strategy. Finally, areas in need of further research are suggested, providing direction for fellow scholars in the field of WLC. These areas include the further refinement of the implementation requirements for WLC in additional case study settings and the need for simulation studies to verify the effectiveness of some of the proposed changes to the underlying theory of WLC.

Introduction

As customers become more demanding, the need for industry to provide more highly customised products continues to increase. Thus, the make-to-order (MTO) sector of industry is of continued importance, and includes capital goods manufacturers as well as many small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), providing customised goods as part of a supply chain. In a recent review of the production planning and control (PPC) literature by Stevenson et al. (2005), in which workload control (WLC) is described, it has been argued that WLC is the approach with the highest relevance to many MTO companies, given that it provides more of the required features than the other alternatives. For example, WLC explicitly addresses the customer enquiry stage at which many such firms are involved in competitive bidding, enabling both realistic and competitive bids to be determined. In addition, it has also been recently argued that WLC has the potential to enable MTO SMEs to be more effectively integrated into the supply chain (Hendry, 2006). Thus, research into WLC to date has concluded that it has the potential to significantly improve the operating performance of the MTO sector of industry.

The overwhelming majority of contemporary research in the field of WLC is simulation based: see, for example, Perona and Portioli (1998), Oosterman et al. (2000) and Henrich et al. (2006). Although some recent experiments have explored ways of replicating real-life job shops in a simulation environment (for example, Bertrand and Van Ooijen, 2002), it has been acknowledged that the job shops found in practice are much more complex than those used as the basis for most simulation models (see Perona and Miragliotta, 2000). Thus, to gain a more detailed understanding of the effect of WLC on performance in practice, case study evidence is needed. Despite this, empirical studies are comparatively few and far between, the most notable contribution in recent times being by Park et al. (1999). A consequence of the lack of empirical research is that little has been written about the process of implementation itself in a WLC context. This paper seeks to address this gap in the literature, thereby facilitating more widespread implementation of WLC.

It is noted that it is inevitable that some of the issues critical to the implementation of WLC are also important to the application of other company-wide initiatives; however, it is not our aim to rediscover issues such as the need for careful change management, to have top-level management involvement and to ensure the project is championed. Instead, this paper seeks to build on this, adding new and much needed insights into implementation issues that are specific, or of particular importance, to WLC due to its characteristics, data requirements and so on. Such insights may consequently ease the implementation process or lead to changes (or simplifications) in the associated WLC methodology. The relevance of these insights can then be investigated in the context of other innovative PPC systems, such as POLCA (see Suri, 1999) and CONWIP (see Hopp and Spearman, 1996).

The remainder of the paper is organised as follows. A more thorough review of the relevant literature is given in Section 2, where this need to investigate implementation issues is further justified. Section 3 describes the research methodology undertaken, indicating that a comparative case study analysis has been used to first identify and explore the implementation issues that arose and then to consider how these issues can be addressed. It is noted that there are a number of different approaches to WLC, the particular approaches used in this study are therefore briefly described in Section 4. The main focus of the paper, the discussion of the implementation issues, is then presented in 5 The investigation of implementation issues: case study evidence and emerging research questions, 6 Discussion of the case study evidence: addressing the research questions, with the former presenting the case study evidence and the latter providing detailed discussion. Finally, in Section 7, conclusions are drawn along with the identification of areas in need of further research.

Section snippets

Literature review: insights into the WLC implementation process

In contrast to WLC, there is a vast literature surrounding the implementation of other planning systems such as material requirements planning (MRP) and enterprise resource planning (ERP); for recent examples, see Sumner (2000), Motwani et al. (2002), Mandal and Gunasekaran (2003), Muscatello et al. (2003), Yusuf et al. (2004) and Dowlatshahi (2005). Despite this attention, the implementation of MRP is continually criticised for having a low implementation success rate (Hong and Kim, 2002;

Research methodology

Two research questions addressed in this paper are as follows:

  • (1)

    “What are the implementation issues that arise in the context of WLC?”

  • (2)

    “How should the implementation issues that arise in the context of WLC be addressed to enable improved implementation in practice?”

It is noted that the second of these research question is very broad and thus more detailed research questions emerged as the research progressed, which are specific to the implementation issues that arose. These are introduced later

The variants of WLC

The basics of WLC have been described by a number of authors, such as Stevenson et al. (2005) and Bergamaschi et al. (1997). A number of reviews have been written which discuss alternative variants of the WLC approach, including Land and Gaalman (1996), Bergamaschi et al. (1997), Sabuncuoglu and Karapinar (1999) and Stevenson and Hendry (2006). Two key methods have been used in the case studies presented in this paper: an “aggregate load” approach is being implemented in Company X, while an

The investigation of implementation issues: case study evidence and emerging research questions

Section 4 discussed four key components of WLC: the customer enquiry, job entry, job release and the simplified shop floor control stages. These components influenced the perspective of WLC that is used in this section to identify implementation issues related to this concept. Fig. 1 illustrates the five basic sources of implementation issues that arose. The first two, (a) market and customer characteristics and (b) the primary process to be controlled, show complexities that have not been

Discussion of the case study evidence: addressing the research questions

Having established a list of implementation issues in the previous section, this section discusses how the emerging research questions can be addressed by developing the underlying theory of WLC or developing elements of an associated WLC implementation strategy. Although methods of resolving most of the emerging questions are proposed here, it is noted that further research will be needed to explore their effectiveness in some cases, particularly where alternative approaches to an issue have

Conclusion and future research issues

The process of implementation is an important issue; however, within the context of WLC, it has received inadequate attention in the literature to date. It is therefore important to build up a body of WLC-oriented case study evidence to develop an associated implementation strategy and to ensure that the theory underpinning WLC systems can be realistically applied to relevant industrial contexts. This paper has contributed to filling this gap by considering a capital goods manufacturer and a

References (66)

  • M.J. Land et al.

    Workload control concepts in job shops—A critical assessment

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1996)
  • P. Mandal et al.

    Issues in implementing ERP: A case study

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (2003)
  • J. Meredith

    Building operations management theory through case and field research

    Journal of Operations Management

    (1998)
  • H. Missbauer

    Order release and sequence-dependent set-up times

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1997)
  • J. Motwani et al.

    Successful implementation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case studies

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2002)
  • B. Oosterman et al.

    The influence of shop characteristics on workload control

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2000)
  • M. Perona et al.

    The impact of parameters setting in load oriented manufacturing control

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1998)
  • I. Sabuncuoglu et al.

    Analysis of order review/release problems in production systems

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (1999)
  • C. Silva et al.

    MAPP-A web-based decision support system for the mould industry

    Decision Support Systems

    (2006)
  • M. Stevenson et al.

    Aggregate load oriented workload control: A review and a reclassification of a key approach

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2006)
  • I. Stuart et al.

    Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective

    Journal of Operations Management

    (2002)
  • Y. Yusuf et al.

    Enterprise information systems project implementation: A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royc

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2004)
  • G. Zäpfel et al.

    New concepts for production planning and control

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1993)
  • G.M. Amaro et al.

    Competitive advantage, customisation and a new taxonomy for non make-to-stock companies

    International Journal of Operations & Production Management

    (1999)
  • W. Bechte

    Theory and practice of load oriented manufacturing control

    International Journal of Production Research

    (1988)
  • W. Bechte

    Load oriented manufacturing control just in time production for job shops

    Production Planning & Control

    (1994)
  • I. Benbasat et al.

    The case research strategy in studies of information systems

    MIS Quarterly

    (1987)
  • D. Bergamaschi et al.

    Order review and release strategies in a job shop environment: A review and a classification

    International Journal of Production Research

    (1997)
  • J.W.M. Bertrand et al.

    Workload based order release and productivity: A missing link

    Production Planning & Control

    (2002)
  • J.W.M. Bertrand et al.

    Production Control and Information Systems for Component-Manufacturing Shops

    (1981)
  • De Souza, A.A., 1995. Developing a knowledge based decision support system to aid make-to-order companies in cost...
  • S. Dowlatshahi

    Strategic success factors in enterprise resource-planning design and implementation: A case-study approach

    International Journal of Production Research

    (2005)
  • K.M. Eisenhardt

    Building theory from case study research

    Academy of Management Review

    (1989)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Card-based workload control for job shops: Improving COBACABANA

      2014, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Once such problems have been resolved, it may be possible to tighten the workload norms even further. In addition to the particularly relevant issue of workload norms, managers should consider other guidance on implementing Workload Control in the wider literature (e.g. Hendry et al., 2008; Stevenson et al., 2011; Hendry et al., 2013) and factors critical to the success of any new improvement initiative, e.g. top management support, training, buy-in from all parties, project management, and so on. The application of cards within production planning and control systems is typically restricted to either controlling the release of orders, as in the case of ConWIP, or to controlling the shop floor and release, as in the case of production Kanbans and POLCA.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +44 1524 594015; fax: +44 1524 844885.

    View full text