Review articlePatient and family engagement in communicating with electronic medical records in hospitals: A systematic review
Introduction
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are a digital means by which information is stored, managed and utilized in hospitals. These records comprise management of patients’ care, the clinical data repository, order entry and clinical decision support [1]. EMRs can contain various components, including patient portals, secure messaging, and computerized physician order entry. This systematic review considers patient and family engagement during hospitalization comprising the EMR and these various components.
Clear communication is important to ensure safe and effective patient care in hospital settings [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The adoption of EMRs in hospitals affects the ways in which health professionals communicate with patients and families. For communication to facilitate participation in health care, patient and family engagement is paramount. Engagement enables patients and families to obtain evidence-based knowledge, to understand available treatment options, and to participate in decision making that reflects their preferences [7], [8], [9]. Past work has demonstrated that patient and family engagement can lead to reductions in serious adverse events and medication errors, and improved quality of care [10], [11].
Despite the importance of patient and family engagement during patients’ hospitalizations, there has been insufficient attention in this area from previous systematic reviews. Systematic reviews on EMRs have focused on the benefits and efficiencies associated with their use, development and implementation of EMRs, usability evaluations of health information systems, and challenges in transitioning from paper-based systems to the EMR [12], [13], [14]. Emphasis has been placed on physician-patient relationships with little attention given to other health professionals [15], [16], [17]. Past work has tended to comprise examination of all forms of technology, thereby potentially attenuating the influence of the EMR [15], [16], [17]. Previous systematic reviews have examined inpatient engagement with diverse health information technologies [18], and communication with patient portals during hospitalization [19], [20]. Some included studies in these systematic reviews have involved an examination of health professional perceptions of patient experiences. Unfortunately, there has been inadequate focus on verbal and written communication with the EMR from patients’ and families’ perspectives during hospitalization, and the ways in which communication affects patient and family engagement.
The aim of this systematic review was to examine how EMRs mediate communication between inpatients, their families, and health professionals to support patient and family engagement in care. A mnemonic for systematic reviews, PICo, was utilized to develop the research question. The components of the research question according to PICo are population (patients, families, and health professionals), phenomenon of interest (communication to enable patient and family engagement) and context (EMR in hospitals) [21]. The research question that guided the systematic review was: how do EMRs mediate communication between inpatients, their families and health professionals to support patient and family engagement in care?
Section snippets
Methods
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [22].
Results
A total of 850 papers were located, of which 186 were duplicates. Using two independent reviewers, 662 papers were screened by title and abstract, and 105 were examined at the full-text level. In all, 32 papers were included in the review (Fig. 1).
There were nine qualitative exploratory studies [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], eight mixed-methods studies [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], three quality improvement studies [43], [44], [45], two controlled trials
Discussion
The systematic review examined how patient and family engagement occurred in hospitals with the EMR using three levels of engagement [24]. These levels were consultation, involvement, and partnership and shared leadership. Interactions tended to be unidirectional in nature, where health professionals consulted and sought information from patients and families to update details on the medical record. Engagement was sometimes extended to facilitate participation beyond consultation.
Conclusion
The systematic review identified that the EMR was usually used to inform patients and families about patient care activities. There was some evidence to demonstrate engagement through involvement, and partnership and shared leadership through the use of patient portals and secure messaging. Future use of theoretical frameworks on engagement and the conduct of research using innovative observational and interventional designs will help to advance knowledge on patient and family engagement.
Authors’ statement
The work described has not been published previously. it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The final version of the publication has been approved by all authors, and if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder.
All authors have made substantial contributions to all of the following: (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors have no interests to declare.
References (65)
- et al.
The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: a systematic review
Health Policy
(2018) - et al.
Using human factors and systems engineering to evaluate readmission after complex surgery
J. Am. Coll. Surg.
(2015) - et al.
Bedside information technology to support patient-centered care
Int. J. Med. Inform.
(2012) - et al.
Usability evaluation of a commercial inpatient portal
Int. J. Med. Inform.
(2018) - et al.
Medical decision making for older patients during multidisciplinary oncology team meetings
J. Geriatr. Oncol.
(2019) - et al.
Moving from rhetoric to reality: patient and family involvement in bedside handover
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2014) - et al.
Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: Yes, There Is a Difference. Policy White Paper
(2006) - et al.
Engaging patients and families in communication across transitions of care: an integrative review protocol
J. Adv. Nurs.
(2016) - et al.
Prioritizing medication safety in care of people with cancer: clinicians’ views on main problems and solutions
J. Glob. Health
(2017) Standardization of inpatient handoff communication
Pediatrics
(2016)
Improving patient-provider communication and therapeutic practice through better integration of electronic health records in the exam room: a pilot study
Health Educ. Behav.
Improving patient-centered communication while using an electronic health record: report from a curriculum evaluation
Int. J. Psychiatry Med.
Giving birth to patient-centered care: embryonic science of patient engagement needs a catalyst
ISPOR Connections
The effects of informal carers’ characteristics on their information needs: the information needs state approach
Inform. Health Soc. Care
Leveraging Key Aspects of Collaborative Techniques to Assist Clinical Decisions. Health Care Delivery and Clinical Science: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs
Health Aff. (Millwood)
Learning from patients’ experiences related to diagnostic errors is essential for progress in patient safety
Health Aff. (Millwood)
The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.
Usability and safety in electronic medical records interface design: a review of recent literature and guideline formulation
Hum. Factors
Impact of electronic medical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review
J. Gen. Intern. Med.
Managing psychiatrist-patient relationships in the digital age: a summary review of the impact of technology-enabled care on clinical processes and rapport
Curr. Psychiatry Rep.
Developing an evidence base of best practices for integrating computerized systems into the exam room: a systematic review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.
Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review
J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. JAMIA
Patient portals facilitating engagement with inpatient electronic medical records: a systematic review
J. Med. Internet Res.
Inpatient portals for hospitalized patients and caregivers: a systematic review
J. Hosp. Med.
Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 Edition
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement
PLoS Med.
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
BMC Med. Res. Methodol.
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies
Health Aff.
Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool
"I want to know everything": a qualitative study of perspectives from patients with chronic diseases on sharing health information during hospitalization
BMC Health Serv. Res.
Nurses and electronic health records in a canadian hospital: examining the social organisation and programmed use of digitised nursing knowledge
Sociol. Health Illn.
Cited by (12)
The effect of Electronic Health Records on the medical professional identity of physicians: A systematic literature review
2021, Procedia Computer ScienceImplementing Smartphone-Based Telemedicine for Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders’ Perceptions
2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research