Elsevier

Inorganica Chimica Acta

Volume 481, 1 September 2018, Pages 143-150
Inorganica Chimica Acta

Research paper
Tuning the locus of oxidation in Cu-diamido-diphenoxo complexes: From Cu(III) to Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2017.09.049Get rights and content

Abstract

While N2O2 tetraanionic ligands containing a strong N-amidate σ-donor are generally assumed to stabilise metal high valence states, we herein have shown that, in dianionic Cu(II)-diamido-diphenoxo complexes, H-bonding and electronic effects on the phenolate groups may modulate the electronic structure of their oxidised species from Cu(III) to Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical complexes; and so in the negative potential range. We observe that electron-poor phenolate complexes 22− and 32− oxidise to Cu(III) species, whereas electron rich phenolate complex 12− oxidises to a Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical. Our DFT results suggest that π-electron-rich phenolate rings in 12− are responsible for an increase of the HOMO orbital energy, bringing the HOMO-SOMO gap small enough to favour a ligand-based oxidation process. Further DFT-calculations have also shown that upon changing the o,p-phenol substituent from electron-widthdrawing groups (NO2) to electron-donating ones (OMe), the favoured oxidised state switches from Cu(III) to Cu(II)-radical. These results emphasize the use of the versatile diamido-diphenoxo backbone as a promising way to novel GO-chemical models, as well as molecular switches.

Introduction

Tyrosyl radicals are found to be crucial for the catalytic activity of many metalloenzymes involved in important biological processes [1]. Galactose oxidase (GO) utilises a Cu(II)-tyrosyl radical redox pair to catalyse the two-electron oxidation of a wide range of primary alcohols to their corresponding aldehydes [2]. In the last fifteen years [3], chemists have succeeded in generating and characterising persistent Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical complexes, providing a better understanding of the electronic, chemical, and even structural [4], [5](a) properties of the active form of GO. Recently, in [CuII-salen]radical dot+ species, a tuning of the locus of the radical has been achieved through ligand backbone substitutions, yielding Class III (fully delocalised π-radical) or Class II (localised phenoxyl radical) Cu(II)- radical complexes [3](e), [5]. Remarkably, in the case of Cu(1,2-salen), the one-electron oxidation results in a high-valent, diamagnetic Cu(III) species in the solid state; whilst in solution a temperature-dependent valence tautomerism exists between the Cu(III) and the Cu(II)-radical oxidised forms [5b].

The ease of formation of the phenoxyl radical is a crucial parameter in designing GO-like catalysts. The oxidation of the phenolate ligand in neutral Cu(II)-N2O2 GO-models is found to be in the potential range 0.1–0.6 V (E1/2 vs. Fc+/Fc), above that observed in GO (ca. 0.01 V vs. Fc+/Fc) [2]. To date, the formation of Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical complexes at low negative potential has yet to be reported. Noteworthy, in the cases of dianionic Cu(II)-N2O2 complexes bearing diamido-diphenoxo ligands developed by Collins [6], an oxidation process at low negative potential is observed. However, the process is attributed to a metal-based oxidation leading to a Cu(III) species [6]. Clearly, the duality between the redox-innocent strong σ-donor N-amidate known to stabilise high-valence state metal complexes [7], and the non-innocent O-phenolate donor makes the locus of the oxidation of dianionic bis-salicylamide complexes non-trivial and deserving of further attention.

Recently, we have reported a unique dianionic square planar Cu(II)-diamido-diphenoxo complex (32−, Scheme 1) in which the coordinated phenolates are strongly H-bonded [8]. A recent report on its Ni(II) analogue shows that its oxidation is metal-based yielding Ni(III) species [9]. Herein we report a detailed study of the one-electron oxidised species of 32−, together with those of the non-H-bonded analogue complexes 12− and 22− bearing either tBu- or chloro- substituents at the o- and p-positions of the phenol rings, respectively (Scheme 1). Our combined experimental and theoretical study strongly suggests that H-bonding and electronic effects on the phenolate groups influence greatly the electronic structure of the oxidised species. Thus, whilst the oxidation of 22− and 32− yield Cu(III) species, that of 12− produces a Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical species, and so at low negative potential.

Section snippets

Experimental section

The synthesis of 3LH6, [NBu4]2[3LH4], [NBu4]2[Cu3LH2] (32−) has been carried out as previously reported [8]. The pro-ligands 1LH2, 2LH2 were prepared as previously reported [6], [10].

Physical methods

Elemental analyses of the compounds isolated in this study were accomplished in the University of Bar Ilan. EI mass spectra were recorded on a Q-Tof micro (UK)-micromass-waters spectrometer. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX300. UV/Vis spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5000 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer. The measurements were carried out using a quartz cuvette with optical pathlength of 0.1 cm.

Cyclic voltammetry measurements were carried out using a Bio Logic SAS Sp-150

DFT calculations

All theoretical calculations were performed with the ORCA program package [11a]. Full geometry optimizations were carried out for all complexes using the GGA functional BP86 [11](b), [11](c), [11](d) in combination with the TZV/P [11e] basis set for all atoms and by taking advantage of the resolution of the identity (RI) approximation in the Split-RI-J variant [11f] with the appropriate Coulomb fitting sets [11g]. To model accurately the H bonding interactions in the complexes, the TZV/P++

Redox potentials: DFT methodology

The thermodynamics of redox reactions is quantified by redox potentials, E, that can be measured electrochemically and are related to the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) with E = −ΔG/nF where n is the number of electrons transferred in the cell and F is the Faraday constant. Theoretical predictions of redox potentials require evaluation of ΔG for the oxidation or reduction process in question, e.g. Red(aq)  Ox(aq) for the oxidation reaction. A common strategy for calculating the free energy change

The dianionic complexes 12−, 22− and 32−

The diamido-diphenoxo pro-ligands, 1LH2, 2LH2 and 3LH4 were synthesised as previously reported [6], [8], [10]. The dianionic diphenolate salts [1L][NBu4]2, [2L][NBu4]2 and [3LH2][NBu4]2 were made by reacting them with two equivalents of [NBu4][OH] in methanol. The complexes (1)[NBu4]2 and (2)[NBu4]2 were prepared in the same manner as (3)[NBu4]2 [8], by reacting the proligand with [Cu(OAc)2]·(H2O) in MeOH in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of 4 equivalents of [OH][NBu4] in MeOH (see Experimental

Concluding remarks: tuning the locus of oxidation in Cu-phenolate complexes: From Cu(III) to Cu(II)-phenoxyl radical

While N2O2 tetraanionic ligands containing N-amidate strong σ-donors are generally assumed to stabilise metal higher valence state upon oxidation [6], [7], our present study appears to indicate that, when the O-donor is a redox-active phenolate group, this might not be necessarily the case.

We have reported a detailed study of three dianionic square planar Cu(II)-diamido-diphenoxo complexes (12−, 22− and 32−) and their corresponding one-electron oxidised species. Compounds 12− and 22− possess

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the CNRS and the COST Action CM1305 ECOSTBio (Explicit Control Over Spin-States in Technology and Biochemistry).

References (14)

  • S. Itoh et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2000)
    B.A. Jazdzewski et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2000)
    P. Chaudhuri et al.

    Prog. Inorg. Chem.

    (2001)
    F. Thomas

    Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.

    (2007)
    C.T. Lyons et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2013)
    K. Butsch et al.

    Inorg. Chim. Acta

    (2013)
  • (a)L. Benisvy, A. J. Blake, D. Collison, E. S. Davies, C. D. Garner, E. J. L. McInnes, J. McMaster, G. Whittaker, C....(b)L. Benisvy, A. J. Blake, D. Collison, E. S. Davies, C. D. Garner, E. J. L. McInnes, J. McMaster, G. Whittaker, C....
  • D.-L. Popescu et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2008)
  • M. Eckshtain-Levi et al.

    Dalton Trans.

    (2012)
  • J. Stubbe, W. A. van der Donk, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 705.; J. Stubbe, Chem. Commun. 2003,...
  • J.W. Whittaker

    Chem. Rev.

    (2003)
  • M. Orio et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2010)
    T. Storr et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2008)
    A. Kochem et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2010)
    T. Storr et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2010)
    P. Verma et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
    T. Kurahashi et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
    R.C. Pratt et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2012)
    A. Kochem et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2012)
    K. Asami et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2012)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text