Prevalence of DNA from the driver, passengers and others within a car of an exclusive driver
Introduction
DNA profiling of trace biological samples provides forensic scientists with a useful tool to assist with the identification of individuals during investigations of criminal activities. To make good use of this tool it is helpful for those collecting samples to have an awareness of which areas to target in order to collect ample DNA to obtain a profile that is of sufficient quality for interpretation. More importantly, this awareness regarding sample collection will aid in generating a probative profile of the person of interest (POI), if present, preferably as a sole or major contributor.
Cars are frequently involved in criminal activities and sampled for DNA. The types of cases and queries can be diverse, but some of the main reasons for sampling include addressing questions such as ‘who drove the car?’, ‘who was in the car?’, ‘where were they in the car?’ and, ‘how long can DNA persist in a car?’. The areas targeted are dependent on the query and are often kept to a minimum for efficiency purposes. Apart from obvious blood or semen stains on surfaces of a car, or sampling of personal objects left in a car, the main source of biological material sampled is that left by occupants through touching surfaces. This includes, for example, touching surfaces directly with their bare hands, sitting in a seat, or leaning their head against a head rest. The area within a car most targeted for sampling is the steering wheel; other items occasionally sampled include door handles, gear lever and handbrake [[1], [2], [3], [4]].
Application of more discriminating and sensitive STR-multiplex kits has, in addition to expanding our ability to generate profiles from a wide range of items/surfaces [5,6], increased the proportion of samples from touched objects that provide mixture profiles. Many samples collected from cars provide mixed profiles [7,8]. It is desirable to have an awareness of whose DNA is contributing to mixed profiles, and in what proportions, given the history of the surfaces sampled and the individuals interacting with them. As there is an increasing need to also address questions relating to ‘how the DNA got to be on the surface it was collected from’, such awareness may assist evaluation of alternate scenarios provided by prosecution and defence when propositions relate to activities [9,10].
Given that many samples collected from cars are from surfaces that have been touched, coupled with the knowledge that hands readily transfer not just their own DNA but that acquired from contacting other individuals and objects/surfaces contacted by others [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]], one could expect to find DNA from individuals who have never been in the car. It is useful to have an awareness of where DNA of a sole regular driver, their passengers and their close associates may be located within a car. Knowledge of the persistence of DNA derived from occupants of a car after known use and time can also be useful in assisting sample targeting.
There are, however, very few studies published on the success rates of samples collected from the many possible target areas within a car to verify whether the steering wheel or other areas occasionally (or never) targeted may be better, or equally useful, to target depending on the case at hand. Those studies available employed less sensitive profiling kits than those currently commonly used; sampled a few areas other than steering wheels; did not distinguish the various items collected from a car; provided very limited or no information on the types of profiles retrieved, the number of contributors, or their probative value; did not provide any information on the identity of profile contributors other than the POI; concentrated only on the driver’s side; and/or provided very limited information or no information regarding the history of car use [[1], [2], [3], [4],7,8,30]. Whilst there have been a few studies on transfer and persistence of DNA deposited by touching actions [19,20,[22], [23], [24],26,29], none have focused on aspects associated with cars.
Here we report findings of a study analysing DNA samples (using a current commonly used profiling methodology) collected from 35–36 areas within each of four cars, including the exterior and interior car door handles (driver and passenger side) through to the internal compartments (driver’s side, middle area and front passenger’s side), and car keys. Reference samples were also collected from the exclusive drivers, their co-resident partners and recent passengers. The cars were selected as having an exclusive owner with a known history of use and occupancy. While some results pertaining to the steering wheel of these cars have been reported previously [30], here we interpret the results of this item within the broader context of all items sampled and provide further background information relating to this item. The profiles, along with the known histories of the cars (acquired using an extensive questionnaire), were evaluated to broaden our understanding of DNA transfer, prevalence, persistence, and recovery (TPPR) related issues, as well as to assist criminal investigations involving cars
Section snippets
Experimental procedure
Four cars (C1-C4) with exclusive owners/drivers were selected for this study, and a total of 36 exterior and interior sites (C1, C3), 35 exterior and interior sites (C2, C4) from both the driver and passenger sides were sampled (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Drivers in this study were known not to wear gloves whilst driving. In addition to the interior sites routinely sampled during criminal investigation (steering wheel column, door handles, gear lever and handbrake), this experiment focused on
DNA recovery
The range of DNA quantities (ng) retrieved from the 36 areas (C1, C3) and 35 areas (C2, C4) sampled within each of the four cars is shown in Fig. 1. See Supplementary Table 1 for detailed DNA yields retrieved from each site per car, as well as the average DNA for each site (and SD).
Of the 142 sites sampled no detectable DNA was recovered from 2 sites; passenger exterior door handle of C3 and the passenger seat headrest of C4. Yields ranging from 0.12 ng to 66 ng were obtained from all other areas
Discussion
This study aimed to enhance our understanding of the likelihood of detecting DNA from a known driver, their non-driving co-resident partner and passenger(s) within cars, given known recent activities, in order to acquire insights into potential improvements in the targeting of samples. We also wished to improve the understanding of the types of profiles generated from surfaces within a car to assist criminal investigations. Below we consider the results obtained from different perspectives.
Each
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Toni Boyko: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Project administration. B. Szkuta: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. R. John Mitchell: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Roland A.H. van Oorschot: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. We thank all volunteers for their participation, as well as laboratory staff for their assistance with sample processing and profile analyses.
References (40)
- et al.
Forensic identification of a murderer by LCN DNA collected from the inside of the victim’s car
Int. Congress Series
(2004) - et al.
Retrieval of DNA and genetic profiles from swabs taken inside cars
Int. Congress Series
(2006) - et al.
DNA profiling success and relevance of 1739 contact stains from caseworks
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Supp. Series
(2008) - et al.
Experimental studies on identification of the driver based on STR analysis
Int. J. Legal Med.
(2008) - et al.
Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: a review
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
(2018) - et al.
DNA transfer in forensic science: a review
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
(2019) - et al.
The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces
Forensic Sci. Int.
(2002) - et al.
Investigation of secondary DNA transfer of skin cells under controlled test conditions
Leg. Med.
(2010) - et al.
Persistence of DNA deposited by the original user on objects after subsequent use by a second person
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
(2014) - et al.
The complexities of DNA transfer during a social setting
Leg. Med.
(2015)
Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Shedder status-an analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints deposited by the same individuals over time
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Shedding light on the relative DNA contribution of two persons handling the same object
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
The origin of unknown source DNA from touched objects
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Prevalence of human cell material: DNA and RNA profiling of public and private objects and after activity scenarios
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Trace DNA evidence dynamics: an investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Transfer and persistence of DNA on the hands and the influence of activities performed
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
An inter-laboratory comparison study on transfer, persistence and recovery of DNA from cable ties
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Transfer and persistence of non-self DNA on hands over time: using empirical data to evaluate DNA evidence given activity level propositions
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Detection of offender DNA following skin-to-skin contact with a victim
Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.
Cited by (8)
Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019–2022
2023, Forensic Science International: SynergyTransfer and persistence of DNA on items routinely encountered in forensic casework following habitual and short-duration one-time use
2022, Forensic Science International: GeneticsCitation Excerpt :This so-called “evaluative reporting” is a critical challenge within the field of forensic DNA analysis, requiring comprehensive empirical data for the formulation of effective and objective opinions [1–6,9,12,19,20,29]. The empirical data currently available to address activity level propositions is limited [2–7,9–12,19,20,24,26,27,29,30]. Some key issues that must be addressed to fill the gaps in this field include:
Prevalence of DNA of regular occupants in vehicles
2021, Forensic Science InternationalCitation Excerpt :The most complex mixtures (those over four contributors) were found in samples taken from the car seats, particularly those from the passenger side seat. This concurs with the findings of Boyko et al. [27]. Different individuals occupy the passenger seat on different occasions, and each individual, apart from transferring their own DNA, may also indirectly transfer DNA of associates with whom they interacted, or picked up DNA of other unknowns from public spaces.
Investigation into the prevalence of background DNA on flooring within houses and its transfer to a contacting surface
2021, Forensic Science InternationalCitation Excerpt :While there have been a small number of studies demonstrating the addition and removal of DNA from a previously used item when used by a new person (e.g. [28–30]), there is little published in respect to the addition and removal of DNA from spaces depending on their frequency of use. A recent study has investigated the impact of a temporary user of an office area on the presence of DNA originating from the office owner and the temporary user on items and surfaces within the office [24], while another investigated the presence of DNA from known drivers and recent passengers over a period of time on the presence of their DNA on items and surfaces throughout a car [25]. Collectively, these studies suggest that the longer, more frequently and more recently an item is used by a secondary individual, the more likely, and in greater contributions, their DNA will be recovered compared to the initial user or owner of the item, suggesting that DNA from the original user is removed as use continues, though a more systematic approach to investigating this factor is required.
Casework comparison of DNA sampling success from steering wheels and car seats in tropical Australia
2023, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences