Discussion
Comment on the paper “Chicxulub impact predates K–T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas” by Keller et al. (2007)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.066Get rights and content

Section snippets

Misplacement of the K–P boundary

The “golden spike” of the global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP) of the basal Danian (= basal Paleocene and basal Paleogene) is located at the base of the (black) boundary clay at El Kef, Tunisia. The primary criteria for correlation of the base of the Danian (i.e. the K–P boundary) by the International Stratigraphic Commission (ICS, www.stratigraphy.org) and outlined in Molina et al. (2006) are:

  • (1)

    evidence for asteroid impact (Iridium anomaly, Ni-rich spinels, shocked quartz,

An untenable reworking and sea-level scenario

The identification of a cm-thick yellow clay layer, 40 cm below the well-known spherule-rich event deposit, as the original Chicxulub ejecta layer is an extraordinary conclusion. Extraordinary conclusions demand extraordinary evidence. Yet, the authors fail to provide this in any aspect. According to the interpretation presented by Keller et al., the ejecta spherules in the spherule-rich event bed are the result of repeated reworking of the original spherule deposit about 200,000 years (!)

Lack of impact evidence for the yellow clay layer

Keller et al. (2007) refer to a cm-thick yellow clay layer in the Brazos succession as “…original impact spherule layer…” or as “…original ejecta layer with relic glass spherules mostly altered to clay.” (page 349 and Fig. 9 of Keller et al., respectively). However, nowhere in the paper it is clarified whether the authors have found the remnants of true Chicxulub ejecta spherules, i.e. round- or drop-shaped spherules with internal cavities and vesicles. The micrograph in their Fig. 9 from the

Omission of evidence from K–P sections inside and outside the Gulf of Mexico

Various independent proxy data (e.g., concentric ejecta grain-size distribution, similar isotopic ages, and distinct compositional range of ejecta phases) from many continental and marine K–P boundary sections as well as from more than 24 recent Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) K–P drillcores all provide strong support for the genetic relationship between the Chicxulub impact event and the worldwide distributed K–P boundary ejecta layer (Sigurdsson et al., 1997, Olsson et al., 1997, Smit, 1999,

Conclusions

Based on the following major points of criticism, we suggest that Keller et al. (2007) have not made any case for Chicxulub as a pre-K–P boundary impact:

  • i.

    The Brazos K–P boundary level suggested by Keller et al. is misplaced since they rely exclusively on secondary – at best – and poor stratigraphic markers. Therefore, it does not fit the primary criteria of the International Commission of Stratigraphy (ICS) and the Cretaceous–Paleogene Working Group for positioning the K–P boundary (Molina et

Note added in proof

Each ODP Leg (e.g., Leg 207) drills at up to four sites (e.g., ODP Leg 207 Sites 1258, 1259, 1260, and 1261) and at each site, up to three single cores are drilled (e.g., 1259a, b, and c). Therefore, an ODP Leg may provide multiple records of the K–P boundary. For a detailed list of more than 48 DSDP and ODP K–P boundary cores please visit the ODP website at http://www-odp.tamu.edu/database/.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Jose Antonio Arz Sola (University of Zaragoza) for helpful comments on the K–P stratigraphy. We are grateful to Kenneth G. MacLeod (University of Missouri) and Alex Deutsch (University of Münster) for detailed and constructive reviews that significantly improved the paper. We also thank Claude Jaupart for careful editorial handling and valuable suggestions.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (60)

  • KellerG. et al.

    Chicxulub impact predates K–T boundary: new evidence from Brazos, Texas

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2007)
  • KringD.A.

    The Chicxulub impact event and its environmental consequences at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary

    Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

    (2007)
  • Martínez-RuizF. et al.

    Rare earth element composition as evidence of the precursor material of Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary sediments at distal sections

    Chem. Geol.

    (2006)
  • MorganJ.V. et al.

    Analyses of shocked quartz at the global K–P boundary indicate an origin from a single, high-angle, oblique impact at Chicxulub

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2006)
  • NakayamaK. et al.

    Depositional processes of primary to reworked volcaniclastics on an alluvial plain: an example from the lower Pliocene Ohta tephra bed of the Tokai Group, central Japan

    Sedimentary Geology

    (1997)
  • SchneiderJ.-L. et al.

    Primary or secondary distal volcaniclastic turbidites: how to make the distinction? An example from the Miocene of New Zealand (Mahia Peninsula, North Island)

    Sediment. Geol.

    (2001)
  • SchulteP. et al.

    The Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–P) boundary at Brazos, Texas: sequence stratigraphy, depositional events and the Chicxulub impact

    Sediment. Geol.

    (2006)
  • AlvarezW. et al.

    Emplacement of Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary shocked quartz from Chicxulub crater

    Science

    (1995)
  • ArenillasI. et al.

    An independent test of planktic foraminiferal turnover across the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/P) boundary at El Kef, Tunisia: catastrophic mass extinction and possible survivorship

    Micropaleontology

    (2000)
  • BaumG.R. et al.

    Sequence stratigraphic concepts applied to Paleogene outcrops, Gulf and Atlantic basins

  • BerggrenW.A. et al.

    A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy

  • BohorB.F. et al.

    Origin and diagenesis of K/T impact spherules — from Haiti to Wyoming and beyond

    Meteoritics

    (1995)
  • BownP.

    Selective calcareous nannoplankton survivorship at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary

    Geology

    (2005)
  • BralowerT.J. et al.

    Leg 198 summary

  • ChiperaS.J. et al.

    Baseline studies of the Clay Minerals Society source clays: powder X-ray diffraction analyses

    Clays Clay Miner.

    (2001)
  • ClaeysP. et al.

    Distribution of Chicxulub ejecta at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary

  • ClaytonT. et al.

    The implications of the reworking on the mineralogy and chemistry of lower Carboniferous K-bentonites

    Clay Miner.

    (1996)
  • CoeA.L. et al.

    The Sedimentary Record of Sea-Level Change

    (2003)
  • D'HondtS. et al.

    Organic carbon fluxes and ecological recovery from the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction

    Science

    (1998)
  • Cited by (13)

    • The Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary: Foraminifera, sea grasses, sea level change and sequence stratigraphy

      2016, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The K/Pg boundary records a number of synchronous extinction events (Keller et al., 2009) in both the marine and terrestrial realms, including some invertebrates (e.g., ammonites, but see Landman et al., 2014), calcareous nannofossils, planktic foraminifera and non-avian dinosaurs. The relative roles of the Chicxulub bolide impact and Deccan volcanism in the various extinction hypotheses are still in debate within the geoscience community (Keller et al., 2004a,b, 2007, 2008; Schulte et al., 2006, 2008, 2009; Adatte et al., 2011; Keller and Adatte, 2011; Schoene et al., 2015), often causing some degree of acrimony. In particular, Keller et al. (2004a,b, 2007, 2008) have suggested that a yellow claystone a few centimetres below the ‘Event Bed’ in Cottonmouth Creek, Brazos River area, Texas, was indicative of a pre-extinction event impact, although this suggestion has been vigorously contested (Schulte et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text