Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 56, Issue 2, 30 December 2010, Pages 693-699
Electrochimica Acta

Enhanced lithium storage in a VO2(B)-multiwall carbon nanotube microsheet composite prepared via an in situ hydrothermal process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.012Get rights and content

Abstract

A novel VO2(B)-multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) composite with a sheet-like morphology was synthesized by a simple in situ hydrothermal process. The morphology and structural properties of the samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). FE-SEM observations demonstrated that the nanosheets are frequently grown together in the form of bundles composed of numerous nanosheets, each with a smooth surface and a typical length of 300–500 nm, width of 50–150 nm, and thickness of 10–50 nm. Electrochemical measurements were carried out using different discharge cut-off voltages. Electrochemical tests show that the VO2(B)–MWCNT composite cathode features long-term cycling stability and high discharge capacity (177 mAh g−1) in the voltage range of 2.0–3.25 V at 1 C with a capacity retention of 92% after 100 cycles. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) indicate that the VO2(B)–MWCNT composite electrode has very low charge-transfer resistance compared with pure VO2(B), indicating the enhanced ionic conductivity of the VO2(B)–MWCNT composite. The enhanced cycling stability is attributed to the fact that the VO2(B)–MWCNT composite can prevent the aggregation of active materials, accommodate the large volume variation, and maintain good electronic contact. We strongly believe that the VO2(B)–MWCNT composite can be considered as a potential cathode material for lithium-ion batteries.

Introduction

Cathodes are very indispensable and a key part of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), and great research efforts have been devoted to cathode materials in order to decrease costs and to address safety issues [1]. Among all the cathode materials, the most widely studied systems include compounds with three-dimensional (LiMn2O4, LiFePO4) or layered (LiMO2 with M = Co, Ni) structures which exhibit good topotactic insertion/deinsertion properties [2]. LiCoO2 is the most popular cathode materials, owing to the convenience and simplicity of preparation [3]. The LixCoO2 system has been studied extensively [4], [5] and exhibits excellent cyclability at room temperature for 1 > x > 0.5. The specific capacity of the material is limited to the range of 137–140 mAh g−1, although the theoretical capacity of LiCoO2 is 273 mAh g−1 [6]. LixCoO2 is also very expensive and highly toxic, which is unfortunate, considering its good electrochemical properties and easy synthesis. In an attempt to develop alternative cathodes, layered LiNiO2, spinel LiMn2O4, and olivine LiFePO4 have become attractive, since Ni, Mn, and Fe are less expensive and less toxic than Co. However, LiNiO2 suffers from structural changes, thermal runaway, and difficulties in synthesizing it as an ordered material with all Ni3+ [7], [8], [9], [10]. Furthermore, LiMn2O4 suffers from severe capacity fade at elevated temperatures, and several factors, such as manganese dissolution, Jahn–Teller distortion, loss of crystallinity, and development of microstrain during cycling have been reported to be responsible for the capacity fade [11], [12], [13]. Also, LiMn2O4 has a limited capacity of <120 mAh g−1, which is less than that of LiCoO2 (140 mAh g−1). Olivine-like LiFePO4 appears to be an interesting positive electrode material for Li-ion batteries because of its low toxicity, low cost, long cycle life, and cell safety. However, a major limitation of this material, which prevents it from being used in large-scale applications, is its poor high-rate performance, owing to its low electronic conductivity and low ionic diffusion coefficient [14], [15]. For Li-ion intercalation applications, vanadium oxides are an attractive alternative, as vanadium is known to exist in a wide range of oxidation states from +2, as in VO, to +5, as in V2O5, and the vanadium oxides have the potential to offer much higher capacities along with the essential advantages of low cost, abundant source material, and easy synthesis. Over the decades, vanadium oxides have attracted special interest because of their outstanding structural flexibility combined with their interesting chemical and physical properties for catalytic and electrochemical applications [16]. Among the various known vanadium oxides, metastable oxides such as VO2(B), H2V3O8, V2O5-δ, V2O5, and LiV3O8 have been found to show interesting cathode properties in lithium cells [17], [18], [19], [20]. VO2 exhibits four different polymorphic structures, including the most stable VO2(R) with rutile structure, the monoclinic VO2(R) with a slightly distorted rutile structure, the tetragonal structure of VO2(A), and the metastable VO2(B) with monoclinic structure [21]. VO2(B), in particular, with its metastable monoclinic structure, is a promising cathode material for both organic and aqueous lithium-ion batteries [22], [23], [24]. The crystal structure of VO2(B) consists of sheets of edge sharing VO6 octahedra linked by corner sharing to adjacent sheets along the c-direction of the unit cell [25]. This sharing structure is related to the structural stability and the consequent resistance to lattice shearing during cycling in the lithium-ion battery [26]. Recently, considerable efforts have been made toward the preparation of VO2(B) nanocrystals. Several nanostructured VO2(B) materials, including nanowires, nanobelts, nanorods, nanoneedles, nanoribbons, and urchin-like morphologies have been obtained [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. However, its poor cycling lifetime (usually less than 20 cycles) greatly limits practical applications. The capacity fading of nanoscale VO2(B) is probably due to vanadium dissolution as in other polymorphs below a discharge voltage of 2 V [39], [40] and also the nanosized forms of VO2(B), which have large specific surface areas and high surface energies, making it easier to form the agglomerated state during the electrochemical cycling, thus increasing the charge transfer resistance [41], [42].

Recently, material scientists have shown that three-dimensional (3D), hierarchical, micro-/nano-structures, such as VO2(B) microflowers [43] and VO2(B) hollow microspheres [42], exhibit improved electrochemical properties because they not only inherit the properties of the nano-units, but also have collective properties from the self-assembly of nano-units into microscale structures. From this point of view, microscale structures (composed of nano-units) could be the best choice of material, rather than single nano-units. In addition, coating the surface of the electrode material with carbon has also been proven to be an effective way to increase the cycling stability [44], [45], [46]. The detailed mechanism responsible for this improvement remains unclear; one possible explanation is the enhanced electronic conductivity resulting from the carbon layer [47].

Inspired by this concept, we have synthesized a novel VO2(B)–multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) microsheet composite. The controlled synthesis of VO2(B) is relatively difficult because vanadium is known to exist in a wide range of oxidation states from +2 to +5, and VO2(B) tends to be transformed (>300 °C) to thermodynamically more stable rutile VO2 [26], which is not usable as a cathode material for the lithium-ion battery. Electrode using carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder is also being reported for the first time for this material. The composite microstructure exhibits high lithium storage properties and provides good electronic contact owing to the good mechanical properties and high conductivity provided by MWCNTs. Furthermore, the electrochemical measurements demonstrate that the VO2(B)–MWCNT microsheet composite can be used as an alternative cathode material in lithium-ion batteries with high capacity, good cycling stability, and high-rate capability.

Section snippets

Synthesis of VO2(B)–MWCNT microsheet composite

First, MWCNTs were treated by a mixture of H2O2 (35%, Riedel-de Haën) and sulphuric–nitric acid (3:1 ratio) using a reflux process. The system was heated at 120 °C for 2 h. The product was washed with deionized water and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C overnight. VO2(B)–MWCNT microsheet composite precursor was prepared by an in situ hydrothermal process. In a typical synthesis, a suitable amount of treated MWCNTs, 0.365 g of V2O5 powder (purissima, Riedel-de Haën), 10 mL of n-butanol (>99.0%,

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 presents typical XRD patterns of the VO2(B) (a) and VO2(B)–MWCNT microsheet composite (b). All the diffraction peaks can be indexed to the monoclinic structure of VO2(B) with lattice constants a = 12.03 Å, b = 3.693 Å, and c = 6.42 Å, and β = 106.6° (JCPDS No: 31-1438). Compared with the standard data, the relative intensities of (0 0 1), (0 0 2), and (0 0 3) peaks for the VO2(B) sample were stronger than those of the other peaks to an extraordinary degree, indicating that the as-obtained VO2(B) may have

Conclusions

In summary, VO2(B)–MWCNT microsheet composite has been successfully synthesized via an in situ hydrothermal process. FE-SEM and TEM images confirmed that the composite exhibited sheet-like morphology and illustrated that the nanosheets are frequently grown together in the form of bundles, whereas MWCNTs are attached to the nanosheet surfaces and randomly distributed underneath the nanosheets. The electrochemical measurements demonstrated that VO2(B)–MWCNT composite possesses better capacity

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for funding from the Australian Research Council (ARC) under an ARC Centre of Excellence Program (CE0561616) and an ARC Discovery project (DP0987805). The authors also thank Dr. T. Silver for critical reading of the manuscript.

References (57)

  • T. Ohzuku et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1993)
  • T. Ohzuku et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1994)
  • A. Hirano et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1995)
  • R.J. Gummow et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1994)
  • G. Dutta et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1992)
  • Ch.V. Subba Reddy et al.

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2009)
  • A.M. Kannan et al.

    Solid-State Ionics

    (2003)
  • H. Qiao et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2006)
  • G. Armstrong et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • K.F. Zhang et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2006)
  • F. Sediri et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (2009)
  • X.H. Liu et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (2008)
  • X. Li et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2007)
  • F. Sediri et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. B: Solid

    (2006)
  • L.J. Mao et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (2008)
  • S.H. Luo et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2008)
  • C.H. Mi et al.

    Powder Technol.

    (2008)
  • B. Li et al.

    Solid State Sci.

    (2006)
  • H. Liu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2009)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Solid-State Commun.

    (2004)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2010)
  • J. Li et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids

    (2010)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2010)
  • S.H. Ng et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2007)
  • N. Ding et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2009)
  • Y. He et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2010)
  • Z. Li et al.

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (2009)
  • G. Amatucci et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text