New insights into nickel-free superelastic titanium alloys for biomedical applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2019.100783Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A concise review of recent advances in Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys.

  • A detailed discussion of architectural design enabled superelasticity without resort to reversible phase transformation.

  • An in-depth analysis of additive manufacturing for Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys.

  • A comprehensive assessment of the properties of both dense and porous Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys vs. human bones.

  • An overview of representative biomedical applications of superelastic Ti alloys.

Abstract

Superelastic titanium (Ti) alloys are a group of unique functional metallic materials capable of recovering a substantial amount of mechanical strain thereby offering superior resilience. Such strain recovery is significantly greater than that exhibited by conventional elasticity and has been demonstrated to be clearly beneficial and necessary for a vast range of biomedical and dental applications. For example, the age-related physiological deterioration of bones signifies the necessity of employing superelastic implants. Currently, NiTi alloy remains to be the premier choice of superelastic alloys in the broad biomedical sector. However, recently reinforced views on the toxic, carcinogenic and allergenic properties of nickel have resulted in intensified concerns. This has encouraged the design and fabrication of Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys. In addition, enabled by additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, hierarchical micro-architectured lattice meta-materials can exhibit exceptional superelasticity without undergoing phase transformations, upending the conventional perception and unlocking brand-new pathways to exploiting metal superelasticity. This article discusses recent developments in Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys and the determining factors affecting their superelastic recoverable strain. The importance of implant superelasticity relative to the elastic and “superelastic” properties of human bones is examined. Also discussed are the advances in Ni-free Ti-based superelastic alloy design and superelasticity-demanding medical and dental applications. The impact of the AM-enabled micro-architectural design on the development of superelastic structures or superelastic meta-materials is deliberated. Future research priorities are suggested.

Introduction

The superelasticity of a metallic material refers to the significant recoverable strain exhibited by the material on unloading. This phenomenon, generally driven by stress-induced reversible martensitic transformation, was first reported in 1958 [1], followed by the milestone development of the nickel-based NiTi in 1962 [2], [3]. Superelasticity is closely related to the shape memory effect in terms of the driving mechanism. To date, Ti-rich NiTi (i.e. Martensitic Nitinol) and Ni-rich NiTi (i.e. Austenitic Nitinol) are the premier shape memory and superelastic alloys in use, respectively. Table 1 summarises the important developments of superelasticity with emphasis on medical applications. Fig. 1, on the other hand, reveals the increasing trend in superelasticity-related patents filed since early 1990s. The last three decades have seen an impressive rise in the demand for superelastic properties across various technological fields. The drop after 2017 is caused by data lags.

Recently, research in superelastic bio-materials has shifted towards the design and development of Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys. This is due to the rising concerns over the potential health hazards corresponding to the release of Ni ions from the Ni-containing implants after implantation.

This paper discusses the most recent advances in biomedical Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys including new alloy design principles, novel manufacturing processes, and emerging applications, along with additive manufacturing (AM) enabled hierarchical micro-architectural superelastic lattice structures.

Section snippets

Due to reversible stress-induced martensitic transformation

Superelasticity typically arises from the reversible stress-induced martensitic transformation (Fig. 2). Unlike the shape memory effect where the material is deformed while in the martensitic state, superelasticity is achieved above the austenite finish temperature (Af) [43] (i.e. in the Austenitic state). The body-centred cubic (BCC) β-phase in Ti-based superelastic alloys is referred to as the “austenite” phase. When loaded up to a certain critical stress (σSIM), β phase transforms into

Potential health hazards associated with Ni-containing superelastic alloys

Ni-rich NiTi alloy is the most commonly used superelastic alloy as implants, orthodontic wires and dental and surgical tools. This is ongoing while the serious health hazards of nickel are clearly established [66]. The primary potential risk associated with the use of NiTi alloy is Ni hypersensitivity and contact dermatitis. Metal ions such as Ni2+, Co2+, Cu2+ or Cr2+ are haptens with high immunogenic potential. Particularly, Ni is classified as carcinogenic, genotoxic, mutagenic, allergenic

Elastic properties of human bones

Superelastic materials have great advantages for orthopaedic load-bearing implants due to their superior damping properties [125]. These properties minimise local stress intensity experienced by bone tissue and the bone-implant elastic mismatch. Here we limit our attention to the superelastic-like properties of human bones and their elastic properties as a function of age, bone types and anatomic sites.

Additive manufacturing of Ni-free superelastic titanium alloys

Ni-free superelastic Ti alloys have been fabricated by vacuum arc remelting, vacuum induction melting and electron beam melting primarily for research purposes. For instance, the superelastic Ti-25Nb-25Ta (wt.%) [100] and Ti-6Mo-4Sn (at.%) [170] alloys were synthesised using cold crucible induction melting to achieve the desired homogeneity. Chemical homogeneity is particularly important in the case of superelastic alloys due to the high sensitivity of martensitic transformation temperatures to

Applications of superelasticity in medical and dental industries

Superelasticity has been in practical use in the biomedical and dental industries for over 20 years. In addition, it has found niche applications in other sectors. Selected examples are discussed below.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

The following insights can be gained from this critical review:

  • (1)

    In addition to the classical superelasticity driven by stress-induced reversible martensitic transformations, hierarchical micro-architectured designs enabled by AM can lead to more significant superelastic behaviour, without undergoing phase transformations. Such superelastic micro-architectures or meta-materials offer an entirely new pathway to the utilisation of superelasticity. It upends the conventional

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC), Australia through the Linkage Program (LP) under LP140100608.

References (223)

  • A. Biesiekierski et al.

    A new look at biomedical Ti-based shape memory alloys

    Acta Biomater.

    (2012)
  • H.F. Hildebrand et al.

    Nickel, chromium, cobalt dental alloys and allergic reactions: an overview

    Biomaterials

    (1989)
  • C.L. Dunlap et al.

    Allergic reaction to orthodontic wire: report of case

    J. Am. Dent. Assoc.

    (1989)
  • H. Kim et al.

    Martensitic transformation, shape memory effect and superelasticity of Ti–Nb binary alloys

    Acta Mater.

    (2006)
  • Y. Al-Zain et al.

    Shape memory properties of Ti–Nb–Mo biomedical alloys

    Acta Mater.

    (2010)
  • M. Abdel-Hady et al.

    Phase stability change with Zr content in β-type Ti–Nb alloys

    Scr. Mater.

    (2007)
  • A. Ramezannejad et al.

    Ni-free superelastic titanium alloys for medical and dental applications

  • D. Ping et al.

    Microstructure and shape memory behavior of a Ti–30Nb–3Pd alloy

    Scr. Mater.

    (2005)
  • A. Ramarolahy et al.

    Microstructure and mechanical behavior of superelastic Ti–24Nb–0.5O and Ti–24Nb–0.5N biomedical alloys

    J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.

    (2012)
  • X. He et al.

    DSC analysis of reverse martensitic transformation in deformed Ti–Ni–Nb shape memory alloy

    Scr. Mater.

    (2004)
  • P. McCormick et al.

    Thermodynamic analysis of the martensitic transformation in NiTi—II. Effect of transformation cycling

    Acta Metall. Mater.

    (1994)
  • K. Melton et al.

    Fatigue of NiTi thermoelastic martensites

    Acta Metall.

    (1979)
  • Y. Hao et al.

    Effect of Zr and Sn on Young's modulus and superelasticity of Ti–Nb-based alloys

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2006)
  • M.F. Ijaz et al.

    Superelastic properties of biomedical (Ti–Zr)–Mo–Sn alloys

    Mater. Sci. Eng., C

    (2015)
  • J. Fu et al.

    Novel Ti-base superelastic alloys with large recovery strain and excellent biocompatibility

    Acta Biomater.

    (2015)
  • H. Hosoda et al.

    Effects of short time heat treatment on superelastic properties of a Ti–Nb–Al biomedical shape memory alloy

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2006)
  • T. Inamura et al.

    Mechanical properties of Ti–Nb biomedical shape memory alloys containing Ge or Ga

    Mater. Sci. Eng., C

    (2005)
  • E. Bertrand et al.

    Synthesis and characterisation of a new superelastic Ti–25Ta–25Nb biomedical alloy

    J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.

    (2010)
  • W. Rachinger

    A“ super-elastic” single crystal calibration bar

    Br. J. Appl. Phys.

    (1958)
  • C. Song

    History and current situation of shape memory alloys devices for minimally invasive surgery

    Open Med. Devices J.

    (2010)
  • W.J. Buehler et al.

    Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1963)
  • S. Takamizawa et al.

    Superelastic organic crystals

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2014)
  • A. Ölander

    An electrochemical investigation of solid cadmium-gold alloys

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1932)
  • L. Chang et al.

    Plastic deformation and diffusionless phase changes in metals-the gold-cadmium beta-phase

    Trans. Am. Instit. Min. Metall. Engineers

    (1951)
  • R.J. Wasilewski

    Metall. Mater. Trans.

    (1972)
  • K. Otsuka et al.

    Mechanism of shape memory effect and superelasticity

    Shape Mem. Mater.

    (1998)
  • S. Thompson

    An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry

    Int. Endod. J.

    (2000)
  • J. Perkins

    Shape Memory Effects in Alloys

    (1975)
  • A. Teramoto

    Sentalloy, the Story of Superelasticity

    (2010)
  • M. Schmerling et al.

    A Proposed Medical Application of the Shape Memory Effect: A NiTi Harrington Rod for the Treatment of Scoliosis, Shape Memory Effects in Alloys

    (1975)
  • M. Simon et al.

    A vena cava filter using thermal shape memory alloy: experimental aspects 1

    Radiology

    (1977)
  • T. Duerig

    Present and future applications of shape memory and superelastic materials

    MRS Proceedings

    (1995)
  • Endoscope, Japan,...
  • K. Dai et al.

    Studies and applications of NiTi shape memory alloys in the medical field in China

    Bio-Med. Mater. Eng.

    (1996)
  • S. Miyazaki

    Medical and dental applications of shape memory alloys

    Shape Mem. Mater.

    (1998)
  • C.T. Dotter et al.

    Transluminal expandable nitinol coil stent grafting: preliminary report

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • R.F. Gatturna, J.E. Nicholson, J. O'Leary, Suture anchor, Google Patents,...
  • A. Cuschieri

    Variable curvature shape-memory spatula for laparoscopic surgery

    Surg. Endosc.

    (1991)
  • J.M. Himpens

    Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty

    Surg. Endosc.

    (1993)
  • A.H. Cragg et al.

    Percutaneous femoropopliteal graft placement

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (44)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text