Review
One-electron electrochemistry of parent piano-stool complexes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Whereas the oxidation of ferrocene and other sandwich complexes has been widely utilized in both chemistry and biochemistry, the one-electron chemistry of half-sandwich complexes is still underdeveloped. Here we review the known electrochemistry of the “parent” half-sandwich complexes containing only carbonyl groups and one planar carbocyclic ring. The greatest number of electrochemical studies of this so-called piano-stool series has been conducted on the middle transition metals: in group 6, oxidation of [MCp(CO)3] (Cp = η5-C5H5) and oxidation and reduction of M(η6-arene)(CO)3; in group 7, oxidation of MCp(CO)3 and reduction of [M(η6-arene)(CO)3]+; in group 8, oxidation of [MCp(CO)2] and reduction of [M(η6-arene)(CO)3]+; in group 9, oxidation and reduction of MCp(CO)2. An electron-transfer sequence involving 17e/18e/19e metal centers has often been found. The fact that the LUMOs of the 18-electron complexes are formally metal-ring anti-bonding explains the general weakening of the metal-ring bond upon reduction, and provides a rationalization for the lowering of the metal-ring hapticity that has been reported for several hypervalent members of this family. Reduction past the 18-electron configuration generally occurs at quite negative potentials. Oxidation of the 18-electron complexes occurs principally at the M(CO)3 moiety, but the SOMO of the 17e complex generally has a higher degree of metal-ring covalency than in the 19e case. The 17-electron radicals often undergo metal–metal coupling reactions to form stable dimers, some of which have sufficiently weak metal–metal bonds that they partly dissociate to the corresponding monomers in solution. Oxidation of the 18-electron complexes occurs over a wide range of potentials, e.g. −1.35 V vs FcH for [FeCp(CO)2]−/0 compared to 1.16 V for [ReCp(CO)3]0/+. The radical cations of some first-row complexes, e.g. [MnCp(CO)3]+ and [Cr(η6-arene)(CO)3]+, are stable in the absence of nucleophilic anions and can be used for electrosynthetic purposes or as organometallic redox tags.

Graphical abstract

One-electron oxidation or reduction of 18e half-sandwich metal carbonyl complexes has been effectively probed by electrochemistry. 17e complexes frequently form metal–metal bonded dimers and may undergo fast CO substitution by a donor ligand. 19e complexes tend to lose a carbocyclic ring, undergo metal-ring hapticity changes, or dimerize at the ring. Simple M.O. descriptions of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the 18-electron complexes provide a guide to the electronic and structural behavior of the redox products.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (176KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

► Electrochemistry has been reported on a large number of half-sandwich metal carbonyl complexes. ► Cationic 17e radicals may undergo fast CO substitution by a donor ligand or, especially with heavier metals, form a directly metal–metal bonded dimer. ► Neutral 17e radicals undergo rapid metal–metal bonded dimerization. ► 19e products loose a carbocyclic ring, undergo metal-ring hapticity changes, or dimerize at the ring. ► The HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the 18-electron complexes provide a guide to the ► electronic and structural behavior of the redox products.

Section snippets

Scope and introduction

Owing to the fact that an electron-transfer is one of the principal chemical reactions, investigations of ‘redox chemistry’ have played a significant role in delineating the properties and reactions of sandwich and half-sandwich organotransition metal complexes [1], [2]. The present review addresses the current state of knowledge of the consequences of one-electron oxidation or reduction of an important set of half-sandwich complexes, namely structurally simple compounds having as ligands only

Electronic structure considerations

The basic M.O. schemes of metallocenes and M(CO)3-containing half-sandwich complexes have important similarities [10]. Both have six ligand-based orbitals lying below a set of three predominantly metal-based orbitals, all of which are filled for d6 (18-electron) complexes. Above the filled orbitals is a pair of unoccupied, largely metal-based, orbitals that comprise the LUMOs (see Scheme 2). As noted by Albright et al. [10], [11] the “two (eg) above three (t2g)” orbital model is strongly

Electrochemical studies

Reports on the electrochemistry of parent piano-stool complexes are common, in some cases going back a number of years. Although some of the older papers will be referred to here, more comprehensive coverage of the early work can be found in other references [1], [2]. The present review is intended to cover the current state of understanding of the general subject. We have attempted to offer oxidation and reduction potentials, either E1/2 for reversible systems or Epeak for irreversible

Conclusions and prospects

Electron-transfer involving a sequence of 17e/18e/19e metals is general for simple piano-stool metal carbonyl complexes. Reduction of the 18e complex usually occurs at fairly negative potentials and results in radicals that may undergo changes in the hapticity of the carbocyclic ring, loss of ring or carbonyl ligand, or ligand-based dimerization processes. A number of systems which experience lowering of the carbocyclic ring hapticity give a net two-electron reduction. The overall results

Acknowledgement

The author is grateful to the National Science Foundation for support, most recently under NSF CHE-0808909.

References (95)

  • T.R. Ward et al.

    Organometallics

    (1997)
  • See, for...J. Limanto et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
    D. Seyferth

    Organometallics

    (2003)
  • R.E. Dessy et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1966)
  • K.A.E. O’Callaghan et al.

    Organometallics

    (1991)
  • M. Tilset et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1989)
  • N.G. Connelly et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1986)
  • T. Gennett et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1987)
  • E. Fonseca et al.

    Organometallics

    (1988)
  • A. Pfletschinger et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (1999)
  • J.O. Howell et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1984)
    A.D. Hunter et al.

    Organometallics

    (1992)
  • D. Astruc

    Electron Transfer and Radical Processes in Transition-metal Chemistry

    (1995)
  • W.E. Geiger

    Organometallics

    (2007)
  • W.E. Geiger et al.

    Accounts Chem. Res.

    (2010)
  • N.G. Connelly et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1996)
  • G. Gritzner et al.

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (1984)
    R.E. Gagne et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1980)
  • For example,...D.R. van Staveren et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2004)
    M. Süssner et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • T. Chiang et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1979)
    R.P. Hughes et al.

    Organometallics

    (1986)
    R.P. Hughes et al.

    Organometallics

    (1993)
    D.L. Lichtenberger et al.

    Organometallics

    (1993)
  • For leading references see H. Wang, Q. Du, Y. Xie, R.B. King, H.F. Schaefer, III, J. Organomet. Chem., 695 (2010) 215,...
  • T.A. Albright et al.

    Orbital Interactions in Chemistry

    (1985)
  • T.A. Albright et al.

    Problems in Molecular Orbital Theory

    (1992)
  • C.N. Field et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (1996)
  • E.L. Muetterties et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1982)
  • D.L. Lichtenberger, R.F. Fenske, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 50...
  • R. Fukuda et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2010)
  • H-J. Fan et al.

    Organometallics

    (2001)
  • L.F. Veiros

    Organometallics

    (2000)
  • M. Kaupp

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (1996)
    Z. Lin et al.

    Organometallics

    (1993)
  • D.L. Lichtenberger et al.

    Organometallics

    (1984)
    R.F. Kostić et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1982)
  • M.F. Ryan et al.

    Organometallics

    (1994)
  • A.R. Kudinov et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2004)
  • M.B. Hall

    Mol. Phys.

    (1975)
    J.W. Chinn et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1983)
  • In dichloromethane/0.05M [NBu4][B(C6F5)4]: K. Wu, University of Vermont, unpublished data,...
  • N.G. Connelly et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (1976)
  • N.G. Connelly et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1981)
  • A.G. Orpen et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1989)
  • S. Minegishi et al.

    Organometallics

    (2011)
  • M.V. Butovskii et al.

    Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.

    (2002)
  • N. El Murr et al.

    Inorg. Chim. Acta

    (1979)
  • N.G. Connelly et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1976)
  • K.M. Kadish et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1986)
  • J.R. Pugh et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1992)
  • M. Tilset

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1994)
  • T.J. Meyer et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1985)
    S.L. Scott et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1993)
  • M. Gallagher et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1999)
    D.C. Barbini et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1996)
  • M.L. Baker et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1990)
    S.L. Scott et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1982)
    W.C. Watkins et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Synthesis, characterization, crystal structures and computational studies on novel cyrhetrenyl hydrazones

      2016, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In compound [Re{(η5-C5H4)C(Me) = NNH2}(CO)3] (5c): a) the N1N2 bond length is practically identical to that of 4a, b) the two bonds of the “CipsoCN” unit are a bit larger than in 4a and, c) the imine unit is less co-planar with the C5H4 ring than in 4a [interplanar angles being: 17.9° (in 5c) versus 4.7° (in 4a)]. These findings, that are similar to those found in the ferrocenylimines [Fe(η5-C5H5){(η5-C5H4)C(R4) = N(C6H5)] {R4 = Me or H} [22], suggest that in 4a the electronic communication between the -NHR2 unit and the cyrhetrenyl array is greater than in 5c (we will return to this point later on). The assembly of the molecules of 4a and 5c in the crystals are markedly different.

    • Electrochemistry with the extremely weak coordinating anions: Using of carboranes [H-CB<inf>11</inf>X<inf>6</inf>Y<inf>5</inf>]<sup>-</sup> (X = H, Cl, Br; Y = H or Me) as supporting electrolyte anions

      2015, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, in media comprising CH2Cl2/[B(C6F5)4]−, generation of long-sought kinetically stable radical cations of prototypical metal sandwich (e.g., RuCp2, Ni2Fv2) (η5-Cp = C5H5, Fv = C10H8) [13,31] and half-sandwich complexes Cr(C6H6)(CO)3 [32], MnCp(CO)3 [33], ReCp(CO)3 [10,12] and CoCp(CO)2 [11,32] has been accomplished. These novel and perhaps unexpected findings [3] have motivated the search for other types of electrochemically-suitable WCAs to suit specific molecular applications. In this respect, supporting electrolytes based on fluoroalkoxyaluminates such as [NBu4][Al(OC(CF3)3)4]− have been recently employed in CH2Cl2 to probe the anodic behavior of model systems including ferrocene, ruthenocene, and nickelocene, (MCp2, M = Fe, Ru, Ni) [26].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text