Designing carbon fiber composite interfaces using a ‘graft-to’ approach: Surface grafting density versus interphase penetration
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRPs) are rapidly becoming a viable replacement for traditional materials, such as metals, for light weight applications. They serve as a means to provide substantial savings in fuel consumption over the lifetime of a vehicle, and are critical to achieve reduced CO2 emission targets. The promise of CFRPs is substantial though they possess an inherent weakness in the fiber-to-matrix interface, typically poor interfacial adhesion. The critical juncture where the resin and fiber meet in a composite dictates to a large extent the overall performance of the material. Often, due to the mismatch in surface chemistry between fiber and resin, fiber debonding occurs at relatively low shear forces leading to premature failure of the overall composite [[1], [2], [3]]. This is a function of both the fiber undergoing breakage and the void left in the polymeric phase from where the fiber was removed.
During manufacture the fiber is subjected to an oxidative chemical bath, typically post carbonisation, which is thought to assist in removing loosely bound carbonaceous species. Additionally, both roughening the surface and introducing polar functional groups on the periphery of the fiber are also thought to be occurring at this time, which are believed to assist in enhancing fiber-to-matrix adhesion. As a finishing step, a thin sizing layer is applied to the surface treated fibers, which typically consists of a low molecular weight polymer, emulsifying agents, anti-static agents, and other proprietary constituents. The role of the sizing is often debated, from a practical perspective it causes the fibers to stick together which enables them to undergo weaving and other processes to generate a usable fabric. Another functional role of carbon fiber sizing is to serve as an intermediary layer between the fiber and resin, enhancing fiber wet out and interfacial adhesion. Indeed, it is common when examining sizing materials that a resin ‘compatibility’ is provided, though what ‘compatibility’ is and how it is quantified is not commonly disclosed.
Other approaches to enhance interfacial shear strength have included ex situ surface treatments including plasma treatment, chemical functionalisation, incorporation of nanomaterials, and oxidation [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. These have seen various levels of success and typically include post functionalisation reactions to introduce the functional group of choice, such as amines, carboxylic acids, etc. In these cases, the user must be careful not to overdo oxidation processes as these can sometimes result in concomitant defect generation, or ‘pitting’ on the fiber surface which can severely lower the tensile strength and Young's modulus of the fiber.
In our previous work, and that reported by others, both thermal and electrochemical means have been used to functionalise carbon fiber towards the goal of enhancing interfacial shear strength [[14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. Our approach, using reductive electrochemistry of aryldiazonium salts, has typically revolved around the use of carbon fibers bearing a pendant amine group (in the form of an anilinic nitrogen) which is capable of cross-linking to an epoxy resin. Using this covalent cross-linking approach we have shown increases of interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of up to 220% [21]. Interestingly, analysis of the interfacial interactions in these systems by molecular dynamics indicates that the majority of the IFSS increases result from penetration of the molecules into the polymer phase [18,20,[22], [23], [24]]. This raised the question of how the penetration, and non-covalent interconnection, of compounds tethered to the fiber surface into the polymeric interphase affects the IFSS. The generation of complementary interfaces has important ramifications in several areas as it is critical to the dispersion of nanomaterials within a specific medium. Typically, controlling the surface chemistry [[25], [26], [27]] (and thus interface) of graphene and polymers [[28], [29], [30]], metals [31,32], and within biological systems [[33], [34], [35]] are critical to their successful implementation in modern materials science. Thus, the motivation for this work was to investigate the how the carbon-polymer interface is affected using controlled molecular weight polymers. These insights will have ramifications within various fields incorporating carbonaceous materials. The use of carbon fibers in this case was due to our previous experience in this area, which gives the observations in this work context for interpretation.
With this in mind, the focus of this work was to graft polyethylene oxide (PEO) polymers, due to their high wettability and polarity, of sequentially increasing length (c.f. molecular weight) and determine their effect on IFSS (Fig. 1). Of additional interest in this study is the comparison of ‘soft’ van der Waals interactions versus ‘hard’ covalent crosslinking interactions previously reported [16,22,24,36]. This is a key point of differentiation from our previous work in which a small (3 repeating unit) ethylene oxide diamine was tethered to the surface of carbon fibers using an in situ diazonium salt generation. In that work the presence of the pendant amine cross-linking with the epoxy resin can result in a brittle interface leading to premature failure and poor toughness. Thus, the use of sequentially increasing PEO polymers in this work serves to examine polymer interpenetration effects at the fiber-matrix interface. This serves to enlighten and guide the potential exploitation of interpenetrating networks to optimise composite performance at the macroscale [35].
Herein, we report this effect and show that there is a trade-off between the molecular weight of the polymer (and thus interphase penetration) and grafting density of these compounds on the fiber surface to affect a large IFSS increase. Molecular modelling of the PEO groups on the surface of the carbon fiber suggests that the coiled nature of these PEO groups supresses the potential gains associated with the molecular weight.
Section snippets
Materials
Fibers were provided by Carbon Nexus as a part of Deakin University, Australia. These fibers were collected immediately after carbonization and have not been electrochemically surface treated or undergone any sizing procedure. These fibers possess the physical properties consistent with commercial carbon fibers but are not suitable for weaving or rapid fabrication into composites. The choice to use these fibers was to ensure that the electrochemical treatments carried out within this study were
Attachment of PEO chains to the surface of carbon fiber
The installation of phenylacetylene groups on the surface of unsized carbon fibers was carried out according to previously reported procedures [14,21]. With these fibers in hand, a range of PEO polymers terminated with an azide (N3) suitable for undergoing the copper azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction were tethered to the fiber surface (Fig. 2).
Considering the scale and rate of carbon fiber manufacture it is important to put this functionalisation procedure into context for producing
Conclusions
This manuscript has focused on the attachment of polyethylene oxide polymers of varying molecular weight (1 kDa, 2 kDa, 5 kDa, and 10 kDa) to a carbon fiber surface using click chemistry. This process has minimal impact on the physical properties of the fibers (tensile strength, and Young's modulus), and induced no pitting or structural damage to the fiber surface. The effect of these surface bound PEO groups on interfacial shear strength was also investigated in an epoxy matrix, using single
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Deakin University, the Australian Research Council discovery programme (DP180100094), the ARC Centre for Future Fibers (IH140100018), and the ARC Training Centre for Lightweight Automotive Structures (IC160100032) for funding this project. This work was also supported by the Office of Naval Research Global (N62909-18-1-2024). The authors also thank the Carbon Nexus production facility for providing fibers. We acknowledge the CSIRO for a scholarship to BD.
References (45)
- et al.
Surface, interphase and composite property relations in fibre-reinforced polymers
Composites
(1994) - et al.
Carbon fiber surfaces and composite interphases
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2014) - et al.
Carbon fiber/epoxy composite property enhancement through incorporation of carbon nanotubes at the fiber–matrix interphase – Part I: the development of carbon nanotube coated carbon fibers and the evaluation of their adhesion
Composites, Part A
(2012) - et al.
Mechanical and electrical properties of carbon fiber composites with incorporation of graphene nanoplatelets at the fiber–matrix interphase
Composites, Part B
(2015) - et al.
Toughening of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy polymer composites utilizing fiber surface treatment and sizing
Composites, Part A
(2016) - et al.
Plasma surface treatment on carbon fibers. Part 1: morphology and surface analysis of plasma etched fibers
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(1992) - et al.
Electrochemical surface modification of carbon fibres by grafting of amine, carboxylic and lipophilic amide groups
Carbon
(2017) - et al.
Surface functionalization of unsized carbon fiber using nitrenes derived from organic azides
Carbon
(2013) - et al.
A systematic study of carbon fibre surface grafting via in situ diazonium generation for improved interfacial shear strength in epoxy matrix composites
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2015) - et al.
An efficient high-throughput grafting procedure for enhancing carbon fiber-to-matrix interactions in composites
Chem. Eng. J.
(2018)
A predictive model of interfacial interactions between functionalised carbon fibre surfaces cross-linked with epoxy resin
Compos. Sci. Technol.
Enhanced interfacial thermal transport across graphene–polymer interfaces by grafting polymer chains
Carbon
Enhancement of integrity of graphene transferred by interface energy modulation
Carbon
Duality of the interfacial thermal conductance in graphene-based nanocomposites
Carbon
Oxidation limited thermal boundary conductance at metal-graphene interface
Carbon
Interface structure and strengthening behavior of graphene/CuCr composites
Carbon
Properties and behavior of carbon nanomaterials when interfacing neuronal cells: how far have we come?
Carbon
An on-chip FRET biosensor built on a graphene-biomolecular-interface
Carbon
Polymer matrix of fiber-reinforced composites: changes in the semi-interpenetrating polymer network during the shelf life
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
Increasing the resistivity and IFSS of unsized carbon fibre by covalent surface modification
React. Funct. Polym.
Heterogeneity of carbon fibre
Carbon
A review of interphase formation and design in fibre-reinforced composites
J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (56)
Phthalocyanine-terminated poly(aryl ether) sizing: An efficient strategy in interfacial interactions optimization of CF/PPESK composites with excellent thermal-resistant
2024, Composites Part A: Applied Science and ManufacturingSolvent-free surface modification of milled carbon fiber using resonant acoustic mixing
2024, Applied Surface ScienceLargely improved interfacial adhesion and fatigue life of aramid fiber/polymer composites by developing GO enhanced eco-friendly dip-coating system
2023, Composites Part A: Applied Science and ManufacturingModification of duel functioning PDA-PAADA capsules on interface and resin towards CFRPs with high strength and toughness
2023, Composites Part B: EngineeringA novel cation-π coating of carbon fiber for promoting interfacial properties of fiber-based composites
2023, Diamond and Related Materials