Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 190, October 2015, Pages 60-68
Biological Conservation

Perspective
Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Invasive predators interact with other processes to accelerate biodiversity loss.

  • Habitat- and community-mediated interaction pathways are most pervasive.

  • Focus on single processes often inhibits achieving conservation and management aims.

  • Rewilding, reduced habitat loss, and integrated pest management must be prioritised.

Abstract

Invasive species have reshaped the composition of biomes across the globe, and considerable cost is now associated with minimising their ecological, social and economic impacts. Mammalian predators are among the most damaging invaders, having caused numerous species extinctions. Here, we review evidence of interactions between invasive predators and six key threats that together have strong potential to influence both the impacts of the predators, and their management. We show that impacts of invasive predators can be classified as either functional or numerical, and that they interact with other threats through both habitat- and community-mediated pathways. Ecosystem context and invasive predator identity are central in shaping variability in these relationships and their outcomes. Greater recognition of the ecological complexities between major processes that threaten biodiversity, including changing spatial and temporal relationships among species, is required to both advance ecological theory and improve conservation actions and outcomes. We discuss how novel approaches to conservation management can be used to address interactions between threatening processes and ameliorate invasive predator impacts.

Introduction

Reducing the ecological impacts of invasive species is a central conservation goal globally (Glen et␣al., 2013). Invasive species have reshaped the function and composition of biomes across the globe (Loehle and Eschenbach, 2011), and considerable cost is associated with minimising their ecological, social and economic impacts (Scalera, 2009). One group of invasive species that has contributed disproportionately to the decline and extinction of biodiversity in the regions they invade is mammalian predators (Lowe et␣al., 2000). Through predation (Doherty et␣al., 2015), competition (Norbury, 2001), hybridisation (Daniels et␣al., 2001) and disease (Banks and Hughes, 2012), invasive mammalian predators are among the most damaging of all invasive species. The global cost of monitoring and controlling these predators is in the order of hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars annually (e.g. Clayton and Cowan, 2010, Gong et␣al., 2009).

Nine invasive predator species feature in the list of 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species (Lowe et␣al., 2000), in addition to a further 21 introduced mammals that are known or potential predators of native fauna (IUCN, 2014). These mammals range from obligate carnivores (e.g. Felis catus) to opportunistic, generalist predators (e.g. Rattus spp.). Three of these taxa have had a disproportionate impact on global biodiversity: the domestic cat Felis catus, the red fox Vulpes vulpes and rats Rattus spp. On island ecosystems alone, the domestic cat has contributed to at least 14% of bird, mammal and reptile extinctions globally (Medina et␣al., 2011) and, along with the red fox, has also contributed to the extinction of more than 25 mammal species and subspecies in Australia (Woinarski et␣al., 2015). Rattus rattus is the most damaging species of rat and has contributed to the decline or extinction of 60 vertebrate species worldwide (Towns et␣al., 2006).

To date, management of the threats posed by invasive predators has focused largely on directly manipulating their populations using lethal control. The main methods include combining exclusion fencing and lethal control to create predator-free areas (Young et␣al., 2013); culling, often financed using bounty systems (Bonesi et␣al., 2007); and poisoning, using large-scale baiting programs (e.g. 1080 poison baiting) (Robley et␣al., 2014). A consistent feature of these methods is their sole focus on removing individuals to reduce or eliminate predation pressure on native prey. While these programs have at times been successful in limiting the effects of invasive predators on prey at local scales or on islands (Robley et␣al., 2014), they are extremely costly (Zuberogoitia et␣al., 2010), they have not arrested the ongoing declines of native fauna in most regions (e.g. Woinarski et␣al., 2015), and their applicability at larger spatial scales is questionable (Lieury et␣al., 2015). Further, such management programs often occur without consideration of the density-independent impacts of predators (‘functional’ impacts; outlined below), and with scant regard for how they might interact with other stressors that are impacting ecosystems at the same time (herein ‘concomitant threats’). This has led to unpredictable outcomes of invasive predator control; sometimes it is ineffectual (Bodey et␣al., 2011), or worse, results in a net negative outcome for biodiversity (Marlow et␣al., 2015, Norbury et␣al., 2013). This suggests an urgent need to refine our understanding of invasive predator management, such as when and where to use lethal control, and to consider alternative means of reducing the impact of invasive predators on native biodiversity aside from lethal control.

Here, we review evidence of interactions between invasive predators and six widespread and important threats with strong potential to interact with invasive predators and their control: land clearing, altered fire regimes, large herbivore grazing, anthropogenic resource subsidies, altered prey populations, and the loss of top-predators (Fig.␣1). These threats do not negate the importance of other potential threats, such as overexploitation or climate change, but have been identified as particularly likely to interact with threats from invasive predators (e.g. Newsome et␣al., 2015b, Ripple et␣al., 2014). We consider these six threats as belonging to one of two categories reflecting their underlying ecological cause: those that are mediated by alterations in vegetation structure (‘habitat-mediated threats’) and those that arise due to the composition of the ecological community (‘community-mediated threats’) (Fig.␣1). We discuss the potential for synergies between invasive predators and the six threats by considering the impact of the threats on three mechanisms that can lead to exacerbated (or ameliorated) impacts of invasive predators: (1) changes to invasive predator abundance, (2) changes to the per capita impact of invasive predators, and (3) the impact of the concomitant threat itself on populations of native fauna. Based on this synthesis, we discuss novel approaches for improved invasive predator management.

Central to this synthesis is the notion of interactions between disturbances, both additive and synergistic (Brook et␣al., 2008, Didham et␣al., 2007). Additive effects of disturbances occur when two disturbances that overlap in space and time combine to impact an ecological response variable in a way that is equal to the summing of their independent effects. For example, if land clearing and invasive predators each reduce the population size of a native mammal by 20% in isolation, then populations subject to both land clearing and invasive predators will have a population reduction of 40%. By contrast, synergistic effects arise when two disturbances that overlap in space and time have an impact greater than the sum of their independent effects. Thus, considering the above example, if the combination of land clearing and invasive predators resulted in a 60% decline of the mammal population, the additional 20% above their respective effects represents a synergy. Today, most ecosystems are subject to multiple disturbances that operate at various spatial and temporal scales and interact to some degree, either additively or synergistically (Anson et␣al., 2014, Brook et␣al., 2008, Didham et␣al., 2007).

With regards to invasive predators, there are at least three situations where synergistic impacts are likely to occur. Two of these relate to the response of invasive predators themselves to an ecological disturbance (Didham et␣al., 2007). First, a disturbance may increase the abundance of an invasive predator by improving habitat amount and/or quality. For example, modified landscapes in Australia support higher abundances of introduced red foxes compared to intact areas (Graham et␣al., 2012, Towerton et␣al., 2011). An increase in the abundance of an invasive predator will in many cases lead to an increase in its impact on native fauna, and we refer to this is as a ‘numerical’ impact of invasive predators (Didham et␣al., 2007). Second, a disturbance may increase the per capita impact of invasive predators. That is, although the invasive predator’s population density may remain stable, there is a shift in behaviour such that native fauna are more likely to be depredated when invasive predators co-occur with the threat. For example, predation rates of hispid cotton rats Sigmodon hispidus increased following prescribed fire in Georgia, USA (Conner et␣al., 2011). This is a ‘functional’ impact of invasive predators, as their impact on native prey populations is independent of their population density (Didham et␣al., 2007). Third, where the concomitant threat itself strongly affects a native species’ population, invasive predators may exacerbate its effects such that the loss of individuals from the population due to predation has disproportionate impacts on the population and its rate of decline (e.g. Allee effects) (Soulé et␣al., 1988), and we refer to these as ‘compounding’ impacts of invasive predators.

Section snippets

Habitat-mediated threats

The alteration of vegetation through processes such as fire, grazing and land clearing can negatively impact fauna by removing food and shelter resources (Robinson et␣al., 2013), reducing habitat connectivity (Bar-Massada et␣al., 2014), increasing competition within and between species (Hagen et␣al., 2012), and lowering their population sizes (Soulé et␣al., 1988). Additionally, larger-bodied predators with greater energy needs, more specialised diets and larger home ranges are often less able

Synthesis and applications

We have demonstrated how invasive predators can interact with other threatening processes, potentially exacerbating their impacts on endangered native species. Ameliorating such occurrences presents conservation practitioners with a considerable challenge, not least because of the wide range of ecosystems in which these interactions operate. Given that these processes are largely driven by human influences, implementation of appropriate land management practices should help reduce invasive

Role of the funding source

TSD was supported by scholarships from Earthwatch Institute Australia and Edith Cowan University, CRD by the Australian Research Council, and DGN by an Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship. The funding bodies had no role in the design, interpretation or writing of this paper.

Acknowledgements

The original images used in Fig.␣2, Fig.␣3 are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (www.ian.umces.edu/symbols/).

References (118)

  • M. Lettink et al.

    Removal of introduced predators, but not artificial refuge supplementation, increases skink survival in coastal duneland

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2010)
  • D. Ramp et al.

    Assessing the impacts of roads in peri-urban reserves: road-based fatalities and road usage by wildlife in the Royal National Park, New South Wales, Australia

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2006)
  • E.G. Ritchie et al.

    Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2012)
  • A. Robley et al.

    Long-term and large-scale control of the introduced red fox increases native mammal occupancy in Australian forests

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2014)
  • A.P. Smith et al.

    Patterns and causes of extinction and decline in Australian conilurine rodents

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1996)
  • J.R. Anson et al.

    Effects of multiple disturbance processes on arboreal vertebrates in eastern Australia: implications for management

    Ecography

    (2014)
  • A.D. Arthur et al.

    Effects of predation and habitat structure on the population dynamics of house mice in large outdoor enclosures

    Oikos

    (2005)
  • P.B. Banks et al.

    A review of the evidence for potential impacts of black rats (Rattus rattus) on wildlife and humans in Australia

    Wildl. Res.

    (2012)
  • A. Bar-Massada et al.

    Biotic and abiotic effects of human settlements in the wildland–urban interface

    Bioscience

    (2014)
  • G.R. Barreto et al.

    The tightrope hypothesis: an explanation for plummeting water vole numbers in the Thames catchment

  • P.W. Bateman et al.

    Big city life: carnivores in urban environments

    J. Zool.

    (2012)
  • J. Berger

    Fear-mediated food webs

  • D.M. Bergstrom et al.

    Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • G. Bino et al.

    Abrupt spatial and numerical responses of overabundant foxes to a reduction in anthropogenic resources

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • P. Birtsas et al.

    Carnivores in burned and adjacent unburned areas in a Mediterranean ecosystem

    Mammalia

    (2012)
  • M. Bode et al.

    Eradicating down the food chain: optimal multispecies eradication schedules for a commonly encountered invaded island ecosystem

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2015)
  • T.W. Bodey et al.

    The diet of an invasive nonnative predator, the feral ferret Mustela furo, and implications for the conservation of ground-nesting birds

    Eur. J. Wildl. Res.

    (2010)
  • T.W. Bodey et al.

    Localised control of an introduced predator: creating problems for the future?

    Biol. Invasions

    (2011)
  • L. Bonesi et al.

    Impact of released Eurasian otters on a population of American mink: a test using an experimental approach

    Oikos

    (2004)
  • M.I. Borchert

    Mammalian carnivore use of a high-severity burn in conifer forests in the San Bernardino mountains of southern California, USA

    Hystrix, Italian J. Mammal.

    (2012)
  • D.M.J.S. Bowman et al.

    Fire in the earth system

    Science

    (2009)
  • R.L. Brawata et al.

    Is water the key? Dingo management, intraguild interactions and predator distribution around water points in arid Australia

    Wildl. Res.

    (2011)
  • L.A. Brook et al.

    Effects of predator control on behaviour of an apex predator and indirect consequences for mesopredator suppression

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2012)
  • G. Chapron et al.

    Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes

    Science

    (2014)
  • Christensen, P., 1980. The biology of Bettongia penicillata Gray, 1837, and Macropus eugenii (Desmarest, 1817) in...
  • R. Clayton et al.

    Management of animal and plant pests in New Zealand – patterns of control and monitoring by regional agencies

    Wildl. Res.

    (2010)
  • H.G. Cogger

    Thermal relations of the mallee dragon Amphibolurus fordi (Lacertilia: Agamidae)

    Aust. J. Zool.

    (1974)
  • N.J. Colman et al.

    Lethal control of an apex predator has unintended cascading effects on forest mammal assemblages

    Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • L.M. Conner et al.

    Effects of mesopredators and prescribed fire on hispid cotton rat survival and cause-specific mortality

    J. Wildl. Manag.

    (2011)
  • F. Courchamp et al.

    Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact

    Biol. Rev.

    (2003)
  • K.R. Crooks

    Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2002)
  • K.R. Crooks et al.

    Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system

    Nature

    (1999)
  • M.J. Daniels et al.

    Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2001)
  • Denny, E., 2005. Ecology of free-living cats exploiting waste disposal sites. PhD thesis, University of...
  • N. Dexter et al.

    Predicting ecosystem wide impacts of wallaby management using a fuzzy cognitive map

    Ecosystems

    (2012)
  • T.S. Doherty et al.

    A critical review of habitat use by feral cats and key directions for future research and management

    Wildl. Res.

    (2014)
  • T.S. Doherty et al.

    A continental-scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia

    J. Biogeogr.

    (2015)
  • J.A. Estes et al.

    Trophic downgrading of planet earth

    Science

    (2011)
  • D.M. Forsyth et al.

    How does a carnivore guild utilise a substantial but unpredictable anthropogenic food source? Scavenging on hunter-shot ungulate carcasses by wild dogs/dingoes, red foxes and feral cats in south-eastern Australia revealed by camera traps

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • C.N. Foster et al.

    Effects of large native herbivores on other animals

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (184)

    • Scavenging with invasive species

      2024, Biological Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text